Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“dry weight decrease”

13 matchesgrouped into 1 category

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

2020

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

paper W4385873403 ✕

Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.

tomato 13

Show all 13 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit decreased shoot dry weight of tomato seedlings by 39%.

Taxon: tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment: Water deficit conditions (50% of field capacity)e5
Outcome: shoot dry weighte5
Direction: decreasede5
Value: 39%e5
Comparator: control (B0D0)e5

Verbatim

e5
“Water deficit conditions (50% of field capacity) caused decrease in indole acetic acid (IAA), gibberellic acid (GA), salicylic acid (SA), cytokine, zeatin, and jasmonic acid content of tomato seedlings by ratios of 83%, 93%, 82%, 89%, 50%, and 57%, respectively, and shoot fresh weight, root fresh weight, shoot dry weight, root dry weight, plant height, stem diameter, and leaf area decreased by 43%, 19%, 39%, 29%, 20%…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1494

t0
“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) seedlings”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–73

Title

Drought stress amelioration in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) seedlings by biostimulant as regenerative agent

Metin Turan; Melek Ekinci; Sanem Argin; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2023. doi:10.3389/fpls.2023.1211210

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Biostimulant applications ameliorated the growth and physiological parameters of drought-stressed tomato seedlings.
Intervention effect The 4 L ha -1 biostimulant dose was the most effective for restoring plant growth under drought.
Intervention effect Soil amendment with biostimulant enhanced soil organic matter and total N, P, Ca and Cu content.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased indole acetic acid (IAA) content of tomato seedlings by 83%.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased gibberellic acid (GA) content of tomato seedlings by 93%.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased salicylic acid (SA) content of tomato seedlings by 82%.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased cytokine content of tomato seedlings by 89%.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased zeatin content of tomato seedlings by 50%.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased jasmonic acid content of tomato seedlings by 57%.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased shoot fresh weight of tomato seedlings by 43%.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased root fresh weight of tomato seedlings by 19%.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased root dry weight of tomato seedlings by 29%.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased plant height of tomato seedlings by 20%.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased stem diameter of tomato seedlings by 18%.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased leaf area of tomato seedlings by 50%.
Intervention effect Drought reduced LRWC of tomato seedlings by 21% compared with the control.
Intervention effect Drought reduced chlorophyll a of tomato seedlings by 16% compared with the control.
Intervention effect Drought reduced chlorophyll b of tomato seedlings by 21% compared with the control.
Intervention effect Drought reduced total chlorophyll contents of tomato seedlings by 17% compared with the control.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit decreased root dry weight of tomato seedlings by 29%.

Taxon: tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment: Water deficit conditions (50% of field capacity)e5
Outcome: root dry weighte5
Direction: decreasede5
Value: 29%e5
Comparator: control (B0D0)e5

Verbatim

e5
“Water deficit conditions (50% of field capacity) caused decrease in indole acetic acid (IAA), gibberellic acid (GA), salicylic acid (SA), cytokine, zeatin, and jasmonic acid content of tomato seedlings by ratios of 83%, 93%, 82%, 89%, 50%, and 57%, respectively, and shoot fresh weight, root fresh weight, shoot dry weight, root dry weight, plant height, stem diameter, and leaf area decreased by 43%, 19%, 39%, 29%, 20%…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1494

t0
“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) seedlings”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–73

Title

Drought stress amelioration in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) seedlings by biostimulant as regenerative agent

Metin Turan; Melek Ekinci; Sanem Argin; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2023. doi:10.3389/fpls.2023.1211210

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Biostimulant applications ameliorated the growth and physiological parameters of drought-stressed tomato seedlings.
Intervention effect The 4 L ha -1 biostimulant dose was the most effective for restoring plant growth under drought.
Intervention effect Soil amendment with biostimulant enhanced soil organic matter and total N, P, Ca and Cu content.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased indole acetic acid (IAA) content of tomato seedlings by 83%.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased gibberellic acid (GA) content of tomato seedlings by 93%.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased salicylic acid (SA) content of tomato seedlings by 82%.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased cytokine content of tomato seedlings by 89%.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased zeatin content of tomato seedlings by 50%.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased jasmonic acid content of tomato seedlings by 57%.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased shoot fresh weight of tomato seedlings by 43%.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased root fresh weight of tomato seedlings by 19%.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased shoot dry weight of tomato seedlings by 39%.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased plant height of tomato seedlings by 20%.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased stem diameter of tomato seedlings by 18%.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased leaf area of tomato seedlings by 50%.
Intervention effect Drought reduced LRWC of tomato seedlings by 21% compared with the control.
Intervention effect Drought reduced chlorophyll a of tomato seedlings by 16% compared with the control.
Intervention effect Drought reduced chlorophyll b of tomato seedlings by 21% compared with the control.
Intervention effect Drought reduced total chlorophyll contents of tomato seedlings by 17% compared with the control.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit decreased cytokine content of tomato seedlings by 89%.

Taxon: tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment: Water deficit conditions (50% of field capacity)e5
Outcome: cytokinee5
Direction: decreasee5
Value: 89%e5
Comparator: control (B0D0)e5

Verbatim

e5
“Water deficit conditions (50% of field capacity) caused decrease in indole acetic acid (IAA), gibberellic acid (GA), salicylic acid (SA), cytokine, zeatin, and jasmonic acid content of tomato seedlings by ratios of 83%, 93%, 82%, 89%, 50%, and 57%, respectively, and shoot fresh weight, root fresh weight, shoot dry weight, root dry weight, plant height, stem diameter, and leaf area decreased by 43%, 19%, 39%, 29%, 20%…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1494

t0
“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) seedlings”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–73

Title

Drought stress amelioration in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) seedlings by biostimulant as regenerative agent

Metin Turan; Melek Ekinci; Sanem Argin; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2023. doi:10.3389/fpls.2023.1211210

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Biostimulant applications ameliorated the growth and physiological parameters of drought-stressed tomato seedlings.
Intervention effect The 4 L ha -1 biostimulant dose was the most effective for restoring plant growth under drought.
Intervention effect Soil amendment with biostimulant enhanced soil organic matter and total N, P, Ca and Cu content.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased indole acetic acid (IAA) content of tomato seedlings by 83%.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased gibberellic acid (GA) content of tomato seedlings by 93%.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased salicylic acid (SA) content of tomato seedlings by 82%.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased zeatin content of tomato seedlings by 50%.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased jasmonic acid content of tomato seedlings by 57%.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased shoot fresh weight of tomato seedlings by 43%.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased root fresh weight of tomato seedlings by 19%.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased shoot dry weight of tomato seedlings by 39%.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased root dry weight of tomato seedlings by 29%.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased plant height of tomato seedlings by 20%.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased stem diameter of tomato seedlings by 18%.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased leaf area of tomato seedlings by 50%.
Intervention effect Drought reduced LRWC of tomato seedlings by 21% compared with the control.
Intervention effect Drought reduced chlorophyll a of tomato seedlings by 16% compared with the control.
Intervention effect Drought reduced chlorophyll b of tomato seedlings by 21% compared with the control.
Intervention effect Drought reduced total chlorophyll contents of tomato seedlings by 17% compared with the control.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“dry weight decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

tomato 13