Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“decrease in density”

5 matchesgrouped into 1 category

Claim types

Direction of the findings

plus 3 non-evaluative

Over time

2020

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

paper W4408657048 ✕

Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.

L. barbarum 5

Show all 5 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Radish cover cropping reduced soil bulk density by 1.90%.

Taxon: L. barbarumLycium barbarume0
Treatment: cover cropping with R. sativuse0
Interactor: R. sativusRaphanus sativuse0other
Outcome: soil bulk densitye0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 1.90%e0
Comparator: L. barbarum monocroppinge0

Verbatim

e0
“compared to L. barbarum monocropping, cover cropping with R. sativus led to a decrease in soil bulk density (1.90%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–702

Title

Integrating Cover Crops and Manure to Boost Goji Berry Yield: Responses of Soil Physicochemical Properties and Microbial Communities

Haonan Chen; Fang Wang; Yamiao Gao; et al. Microorganisms 2025. doi:10.3390/microorganisms13030696

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Cover cropping increased soil electrical conductivity by 11.5%.
Intervention effect Cover cropping increased soil total and available nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium by 30.3–138%.
Intervention effect Cover cropping increased soil microbial biomass carbon by 79.0%.
Intervention effect Cover cropping increased soil microbial biomass nitrogen by 184%.
Intervention effect Cover cropping enhanced soil bacterial diversity and richness.
Observation Bacterial community composition differed significantly among treatments.
Intervention effect Cover cropping lowered the bacterial network positive-to-negative correlation ratio and complexity.
Observation Fungal network patterns contrasted with bacterial patterns under cover cropping.
Intervention effect Cover cropping plus medium manure increased fruit yield by 8.71%.
Mechanism Cover crops and manure affected soil microbial diversity mainly through increased total and available nitrogen.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cover cropping increased soil electrical conductivity by 11.5%.

Taxon: L. barbarumLycium barbarume0
Treatment: cover cropping with R. sativuse0
Interactor: R. sativusRaphanus sativuse0other
Outcome: soil electrical conductivitye0
Direction: increasee0
Value: 11.5%e0
Comparator: L. barbarum monocroppinge0

Verbatim

e0
“compared to L. barbarum monocropping, cover cropping with R. sativus led to a decrease in soil bulk density (1.90%) and increase in soil electrical conductivity (11.5%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–755

Title

Integrating Cover Crops and Manure to Boost Goji Berry Yield: Responses of Soil Physicochemical Properties and Microbial Communities

Haonan Chen; Fang Wang; Yamiao Gao; et al. Microorganisms 2025. doi:10.3390/microorganisms13030696

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Radish cover cropping reduced soil bulk density by 1.90%.
Intervention effect Cover cropping increased soil total and available nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium by 30.3–138%.
Intervention effect Cover cropping increased soil microbial biomass carbon by 79.0%.
Intervention effect Cover cropping increased soil microbial biomass nitrogen by 184%.
Intervention effect Cover cropping enhanced soil bacterial diversity and richness.
Observation Bacterial community composition differed significantly among treatments.
Intervention effect Cover cropping lowered the bacterial network positive-to-negative correlation ratio and complexity.
Observation Fungal network patterns contrasted with bacterial patterns under cover cropping.
Intervention effect Cover cropping plus medium manure increased fruit yield by 8.71%.
Mechanism Cover crops and manure affected soil microbial diversity mainly through increased total and available nitrogen.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cover cropping increased soil microbial biomass nitrogen by 184%.

Taxon: L. barbarumLycium barbarume1
Treatment: cover cropping with R. sativuse0
Interactor: R. sativusRaphanus sativuse0other
Outcome: microbial biomasse0
Direction: increasee0
Value: 184%e0
Comparator: L. barbarum monocroppinge1

Verbatim

e0
“cover cropping with R. sativus led to a decrease in soil bulk density (1.90%) and increase in soil electrical conductivity (11.5%), nutrient contents (total N and available N, P, and K: 30.3–138%), and microbial biomass (C: 79.0%; N: 184%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–864

e1
“L. barbarum monocropping”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–623

Title

Integrating Cover Crops and Manure to Boost Goji Berry Yield: Responses of Soil Physicochemical Properties and Microbial Communities

Haonan Chen; Fang Wang; Yamiao Gao; et al. Microorganisms 2025. doi:10.3390/microorganisms13030696

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Radish cover cropping reduced soil bulk density by 1.90%.
Intervention effect Cover cropping increased soil electrical conductivity by 11.5%.
Intervention effect Cover cropping increased soil total and available nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium by 30.3–138%.
Intervention effect Cover cropping increased soil microbial biomass carbon by 79.0%.
Intervention effect Cover cropping enhanced soil bacterial diversity and richness.
Observation Bacterial community composition differed significantly among treatments.
Intervention effect Cover cropping lowered the bacterial network positive-to-negative correlation ratio and complexity.
Observation Fungal network patterns contrasted with bacterial patterns under cover cropping.
Intervention effect Cover cropping plus medium manure increased fruit yield by 8.71%.
Mechanism Cover crops and manure affected soil microbial diversity mainly through increased total and available nitrogen.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“decrease in density”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

L. barbarum 5