Search claims · PlantClaims

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the cold and dry season, cowpea-maize intercrop treated with ICIPE 62 had the lowest aphid infestation and cowpea damage.

Taxon: cowpeaVigna unguiculatae1
Treatment: cowpea–maize intercrop treated with ICIPE 62e1
Interactor: Aphis craccivoraAphis craccivorae0pest
Second interactor: ICIPE 62e1biocontrol_agent
Outcome: infestation/cowpea damagee1
Direction: loweste1
Qualifier: In the cold and dry seasone1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Aphis craccivora”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 14–30

e1
“In the cold and dry season, cowpea–maize intercrop treated with ICIPE 62 recorded the lowest infestation/cowpea damage”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–850

Title

Integrated Management of Aphis craccivora in Cowpea Using Intercropping and Entomopathogenic Fungi under Field Conditions

Allan Mweke; Komivi Senyo Akutse; Christian Ulrichs; et al. Journal of Fungi 2020. doi:10.3390/jof6020060

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the cold and dry season, leaf yield of the intercrop treated with ICIPE 62 was comparable to cowpea monocrop treated with ICIPE 62.

Taxon: cowpeaVigna unguiculatae1
Treatment: cowpea–maize intercrop treated with ICIPE 62e1
Interactor: ICIPE 62e1biocontrol_agent
Outcome: leaf yielde1
Direction: comparablee1
Qualifier: In the cold and dry seasone1
Comparator: cowpea monocrop treated with ICIPE 62e1

Verbatim

e1
“In the cold and dry season, cowpea–maize intercrop treated with ICIPE 62 recorded the lowest infestation/cowpea damage, whereas the leaf yield was comparable to cowpea monocrop treated with ICIPE 62”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–930

Title

Integrated Management of Aphis craccivora in Cowpea Using Intercropping and Entomopathogenic Fungi under Field Conditions

Allan Mweke; Komivi Senyo Akutse; Christian Ulrichs; et al. Journal of Fungi 2020. doi:10.3390/jof6020060

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect In the cold and dry season, cowpea-maize intercrop treated with ICIPE 62 had the lowest aphid infestation and cowpea damage.
Intervention effect In the short rainy season, cowpea-maize intercrop treated with ICIPE 62 had the lowest aphid infestation and damage.
Intervention effect In the short rainy season, leaf yield of the ICIPE 62-treated intercrop was similar to that of the same treatment in the cold and dry season.
Intervention effect Duduthrin insecticide in monocrop and intercrop did not reduce aphid infestation or cowpea damage in any season.
Association The efficacy of the M. anisopliae ICIPE 62 biopesticide could be affected by season.
Intervention effect The M. anisopliae ICIPE 62 biopesticide successfully controlled the aphid population in cowpea-maize intercrop under field conditions.
Intervention effect The biopesticide did not affect aphid-associated natural enemies.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the short rainy season, cowpea-maize intercrop treated with ICIPE 62 had the lowest aphid infestation and damage.

Taxon: cowpeaVigna unguiculatae1
Treatment: cowpea–maize intercrop treated with ICIPE 62e1
Interactor: Aphis craccivoraAphis craccivorae0pest
Second interactor: ICIPE 62e1biocontrol_agent
Outcome: infestation/damagee1
Direction: loweste1
Qualifier: In the short rainy seasone1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Aphis craccivora”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 14–30

e1
“In the short rainy season, the cowpea–maize intercrop treated with ICIPE 62 recorded the lowest infestation/damage”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1046

Title

Integrated Management of Aphis craccivora in Cowpea Using Intercropping and Entomopathogenic Fungi under Field Conditions

Allan Mweke; Komivi Senyo Akutse; Christian Ulrichs; et al. Journal of Fungi 2020. doi:10.3390/jof6020060

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the short rainy season, leaf yield of the ICIPE 62-treated intercrop was similar to that of the same treatment in the cold and dry season.

Taxon: cowpeaVigna unguiculatae1
Treatment: cowpea–maize intercrop treated with ICIPE 62e1
Interactor: ICIPE 62e1biocontrol_agent
Outcome: leaf yielde1
Direction: similare1
Qualifier: In the short rainy seasone1
Comparator: cowpea–maize intercrop treated with ICIPE 62 in the cold and dry seasone1

Verbatim

e1
“In the short rainy season, the cowpea–maize intercrop treated with ICIPE 62 recorded the lowest infestation/damage, whereas leaf yield was similar to cowpea–maize intercrop treated with ICIPE 62 in the cold and dry season”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1153

Title

Integrated Management of Aphis craccivora in Cowpea Using Intercropping and Entomopathogenic Fungi under Field Conditions

Allan Mweke; Komivi Senyo Akutse; Christian Ulrichs; et al. Journal of Fungi 2020. doi:10.3390/jof6020060

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect In the cold and dry season, cowpea-maize intercrop treated with ICIPE 62 had the lowest aphid infestation and cowpea damage.
Intervention effect In the cold and dry season, leaf yield of the intercrop treated with ICIPE 62 was comparable to cowpea monocrop treated with ICIPE 62.
Intervention effect In the short rainy season, cowpea-maize intercrop treated with ICIPE 62 had the lowest aphid infestation and damage.
Intervention effect Duduthrin insecticide in monocrop and intercrop did not reduce aphid infestation or cowpea damage in any season.
Association The efficacy of the M. anisopliae ICIPE 62 biopesticide could be affected by season.
Intervention effect The M. anisopliae ICIPE 62 biopesticide successfully controlled the aphid population in cowpea-maize intercrop under field conditions.
Intervention effect The biopesticide did not affect aphid-associated natural enemies.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In the screenhouse, conidia of ICIPE 62 significantly reduced the A. craccivora population compared with control.

Treatment: conidia of ICIPE 62e0
Interactor: A. craccivoraAphis craccivorae0pest
Second interactor: ICIPE 62e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome: A. craccivora populatione0
Direction: reducede0
Comparator: controle0
Setting: screenhousee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0
“In the screenhouse, conidia of ICIPE 62 significantly reduced A. craccivora population compared to control”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1505–1611

Title

Evaluation of the Entomopathogenic Fungi Metarhizium anisopliae, Beauveria bassiana and Isaria sp. for the Management of Aphis craccivora (Hemiptera: Aphididdae)

Allan Mweke; Christian Ulrichs; Paulin Nana; et al. Journal of Economic Entomology 2018. doi:10.1093/jee/toy135

Other claims from this paper (8)

All claims

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics