Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“decrease in A”

5 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

2000

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

paper W2092604623 ✕

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chilling reduced growth in both clones.

Taxon: Eucalyptus globulus Labill.Eucalyptus globuluse0 e1 e2
Treatment: Chilling (10/5°C, day/night)e0 e1 e2
Outcome: growthe0 e1 e2
Direction: decreasee0 e1 e2
Comparator: control temperature (24/16°C)e0 e1 e2

Verbatim

e0
“Chilling (10/5°C, day/night) led to a general decrease in growth of both clones”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–261

e1
“Eucalyptus globulus Labill.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–166

e2
“Chilling (10/5°C, day/night) led to a general decrease in growth of both clones and significant reductions in root hydraulic conductivity, rate of photosynthesis and stomatal conductance in comparison to plants grown at control temperature (24/16°C).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–432

Title

Responses to chilling of two Eucalyptus globulus clones with contrasting drought resistance

Filipe Costa e Silva; Alla Shvaleva; M. Helena Almeida; et al. Functional Plant Biology 2007. doi:10.1071/fp07080

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effect Chilling significantly reduced root hydraulic conductivity.
Intervention effect Chilling significantly reduced photosynthesis.
Intervention effect Chilling significantly reduced stomatal conductance.
Observation CN5 maintained higher root growth than ST51 at both temperatures.
Observation CN5 had a lower leaf to root area ratio than ST51 at both temperatures.
Observation ST51 allocated more carbon to foliage than CN5 at both temperatures.
Observation ST51 had higher hydraulic conductance than CN5 at both temperatures.
Intervention effect Chilling acclimation maintained higher hydraulic conductivity than unacclimated exposure.
Observation Under chilling, CN5 had higher water status than ST51.
Observation Under chilling, CN5 had higher anthocyanin concentration than ST51.
Observation Under chilling, root growth was inhibited more strongly in ST51.
Observation The hypothesized lower depression of CN5 growth under chilling was not found except in roots.
Mechanism Authors suggest higher root growth at low temperature may protect trees against summer water stress.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chilling acclimation maintained higher hydraulic conductivity than unacclimated exposure.

Taxon: Eucalyptus globulus Labill.Eucalyptus globuluse0 e1 e2
Treatment: acclimated to chillinge0 e1 e2
Outcome: hydraulic conductivitye0 e1 e2
Direction: highere0 e1 e2
Comparator: control plants exposed to chilling temperatures without acclimatione0 e1 e2

Verbatim

e0
“Plants of both clones, when acclimated to chilling, maintained a higher hydraulic conductivity than control plants exposed to chilling temperatures without acclimation”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–905

e1
“Eucalyptus globulus Labill.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–166

e2
“Chilling (10/5°C, day/night) led to a general decrease in growth of both clones and significant reductions in root hydraulic conductivity, rate of photosynthesis and stomatal conductance in comparison to plants grown at control temperature (24/16°C).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–432

Title

Responses to chilling of two Eucalyptus globulus clones with contrasting drought resistance

Filipe Costa e Silva; Alla Shvaleva; M. Helena Almeida; et al. Functional Plant Biology 2007. doi:10.1071/fp07080

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effect Chilling reduced growth in both clones.
Intervention effect Chilling significantly reduced root hydraulic conductivity.
Intervention effect Chilling significantly reduced photosynthesis.
Intervention effect Chilling significantly reduced stomatal conductance.
Observation CN5 maintained higher root growth than ST51 at both temperatures.
Observation CN5 had a lower leaf to root area ratio than ST51 at both temperatures.
Observation ST51 allocated more carbon to foliage than CN5 at both temperatures.
Observation ST51 had higher hydraulic conductance than CN5 at both temperatures.
Observation Under chilling, CN5 had higher water status than ST51.
Observation Under chilling, CN5 had higher anthocyanin concentration than ST51.
Observation Under chilling, root growth was inhibited more strongly in ST51.
Observation The hypothesized lower depression of CN5 growth under chilling was not found except in roots.
Mechanism Authors suggest higher root growth at low temperature may protect trees against summer water stress.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chilling significantly reduced photosynthesis.

Taxon: Eucalyptus globulus Labill.Eucalyptus globuluse0 e1 e2
Treatment: Chilling (10/5°C, day/night)e0 e1 e2
Outcome: rate of photosynthesise0 e1 e2
Direction: reductionse0 e1 e2
Comparator: control temperature (24/16°C)e0 e1 e2

Verbatim

e0
“significant reductions in root hydraulic conductivity, rate of photosynthesis and stomatal conductance in comparison to plants grown at control temperature (24/16°C)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–431

e1
“Eucalyptus globulus Labill.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–166

e2
“Chilling (10/5°C, day/night) led to a general decrease in growth of both clones and significant reductions in root hydraulic conductivity, rate of photosynthesis and stomatal conductance in comparison to plants grown at control temperature (24/16°C).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–432

Title

Responses to chilling of two Eucalyptus globulus clones with contrasting drought resistance

Filipe Costa e Silva; Alla Shvaleva; M. Helena Almeida; et al. Functional Plant Biology 2007. doi:10.1071/fp07080

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effect Chilling reduced growth in both clones.
Intervention effect Chilling significantly reduced root hydraulic conductivity.
Intervention effect Chilling significantly reduced stomatal conductance.
Observation CN5 maintained higher root growth than ST51 at both temperatures.
Observation CN5 had a lower leaf to root area ratio than ST51 at both temperatures.
Observation ST51 allocated more carbon to foliage than CN5 at both temperatures.
Observation ST51 had higher hydraulic conductance than CN5 at both temperatures.
Intervention effect Chilling acclimation maintained higher hydraulic conductivity than unacclimated exposure.
Observation Under chilling, CN5 had higher water status than ST51.
Observation Under chilling, CN5 had higher anthocyanin concentration than ST51.
Observation Under chilling, root growth was inhibited more strongly in ST51.
Observation The hypothesized lower depression of CN5 growth under chilling was not found except in roots.
Mechanism Authors suggest higher root growth at low temperature may protect trees against summer water stress.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chilling significantly reduced stomatal conductance.

Taxon: Eucalyptus globulus Labill.Eucalyptus globuluse0 e1 e2
Treatment: Chilling (10/5°C, day/night)e0 e1 e2
Outcome: stomatal conductancee0 e1 e2
Direction: reductionse0 e1 e2
Comparator: control temperature (24/16°C)e0 e1 e2

Verbatim

e0
“significant reductions in root hydraulic conductivity, rate of photosynthesis and stomatal conductance in comparison to plants grown at control temperature (24/16°C)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–431

e1
“Eucalyptus globulus Labill.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–166

e2
“Chilling (10/5°C, day/night) led to a general decrease in growth of both clones and significant reductions in root hydraulic conductivity, rate of photosynthesis and stomatal conductance in comparison to plants grown at control temperature (24/16°C).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–432

Title

Responses to chilling of two Eucalyptus globulus clones with contrasting drought resistance

Filipe Costa e Silva; Alla Shvaleva; M. Helena Almeida; et al. Functional Plant Biology 2007. doi:10.1071/fp07080

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effect Chilling reduced growth in both clones.
Intervention effect Chilling significantly reduced root hydraulic conductivity.
Intervention effect Chilling significantly reduced photosynthesis.
Observation CN5 maintained higher root growth than ST51 at both temperatures.
Observation CN5 had a lower leaf to root area ratio than ST51 at both temperatures.
Observation ST51 allocated more carbon to foliage than CN5 at both temperatures.
Observation ST51 had higher hydraulic conductance than CN5 at both temperatures.
Intervention effect Chilling acclimation maintained higher hydraulic conductivity than unacclimated exposure.
Observation Under chilling, CN5 had higher water status than ST51.
Observation Under chilling, CN5 had higher anthocyanin concentration than ST51.
Observation Under chilling, root growth was inhibited more strongly in ST51.
Observation The hypothesized lower depression of CN5 growth under chilling was not found except in roots.
Mechanism Authors suggest higher root growth at low temperature may protect trees against summer water stress.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chilling significantly reduced root hydraulic conductivity.

Taxon: Eucalyptus globulus Labill.Eucalyptus globuluse0 e1 e2
Treatment: Chilling (10/5°C, day/night)e0 e1 e2
Outcome: root hydraulic conductivitye0 e1 e2
Direction: reductionse0 e1 e2
Comparator: control temperature (24/16°C)e0 e1 e2

Verbatim

e0
“significant reductions in root hydraulic conductivity, rate of photosynthesis and stomatal conductance in comparison to plants grown at control temperature (24/16°C)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–431

e1
“Eucalyptus globulus Labill.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–166

e2
“Chilling (10/5°C, day/night) led to a general decrease in growth of both clones and significant reductions in root hydraulic conductivity, rate of photosynthesis and stomatal conductance in comparison to plants grown at control temperature (24/16°C).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–432

Title

Responses to chilling of two Eucalyptus globulus clones with contrasting drought resistance

Filipe Costa e Silva; Alla Shvaleva; M. Helena Almeida; et al. Functional Plant Biology 2007. doi:10.1071/fp07080

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effect Chilling reduced growth in both clones.
Intervention effect Chilling significantly reduced photosynthesis.
Intervention effect Chilling significantly reduced stomatal conductance.
Observation CN5 maintained higher root growth than ST51 at both temperatures.
Observation CN5 had a lower leaf to root area ratio than ST51 at both temperatures.
Observation ST51 allocated more carbon to foliage than CN5 at both temperatures.
Observation ST51 had higher hydraulic conductance than CN5 at both temperatures.
Intervention effect Chilling acclimation maintained higher hydraulic conductivity than unacclimated exposure.
Observation Under chilling, CN5 had higher water status than ST51.
Observation Under chilling, CN5 had higher anthocyanin concentration than ST51.
Observation Under chilling, root growth was inhibited more strongly in ST51.
Observation The hypothesized lower depression of CN5 growth under chilling was not found except in roots.
Mechanism Authors suggest higher root growth at low temperature may protect trees against summer water stress.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“decrease in A”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics