Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“decrease in relative water content”

1 match

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

2010

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

paper W2792072642 ✕

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Specific leaf water content did not significantly decrease during drought stress.

Taxon: chili pepperCapsicumt0
Treatment: drought stresse0
Outcome: SLWCe0
Direction: did not significantly decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“chili pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–131

e0
“SLFW and SLWC did not significantly decrease during drought stress period.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1290–1364

Title

Relative leaf expansion rate and other leaf-related indicators for detection of drought stress in chili pepper (Capsicum annuum L.).

Laily Ilman Widuri; Benyamin Lakitan; Mery Hasmeda; et al. Australian Journal of Crop Science 2017. doi:10.21475/ajcs.17.11.12.pne800

Other claims from this paper (5)

Observation Relative leaf expansion rate varied mainly with the day-night cycle rather than gradual drought.
Intervention effect Specific leaf fresh weight did not significantly decrease during drought stress.
Intervention effect Drought stress significantly inhibited total leaf area.
Intervention effect Chili pepper recovered after four days of drought stress.
Intervention effect Chili pepper did not recover after eight days or longer of drought stress.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“decrease in relative water content”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics