Paper · 2017 · Australian Journal of Crop Science

Relative leaf expansion rate and other leaf-related indicators for detection of drought stress in chili pepper (Capsicum annuum L.).

Laily Ilman Widuri; Benyamin Lakitan; Mery Hasmeda; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
25
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Leaf is a sensitive plant organ in responding to abiotic stresses, especially drought stress. Objective of this research was to evaluate changes of relative leaf expansion rate (RLER) and other leaf-related indicators as affected by gradual drought stress. The stress was induced by withholding water supply to chili pepper (Capsicum annum L.) for up to 12 days. Afterward, the crops were allowed to recover. The research was conducted in two stages. The first stage was for finding a reliable leaf area (LA) estimation model. The second stage was for evaluating relevance of RLER, specific leaf fresh weight (SLFW), specific leaf water content (SLWC), and total leaf area (TLA) as indicators for drought stress in chili pepper. Combinations of five regression models (linear, zero-intercept linear, quadratic, zero-intercept quadratic, and power) and three predictors, i.e. leaf length (L), leaf width (W), and LW were evaluated as candidates of LA estimation model. Selection of the models was based on coefficient of determination (R 2 ) and geometrical principles. The selected model was used for calculating RLER, SLFW, SLWC and TLA. Results of this study indicated that dynamic changes of RLER were mainly driven by daily day-night cycle rather than long-term gradual drought stress. SLFW and SLWC did not significantly decrease during drought stress period. However, drought stress significantly inhibited TLA in chili pepper. Chili pepper was able to recover from short-term (4 days) exposure to drought stress; yet, this crop was unable to recover after 8 days exposure to drought stress or longer.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative leaf expansion rate varied mainly with the day-night cycle rather than gradual drought.

Taxon
chili pepperCapsicumt0
Outcome
dynamic changes of RLERe0
Qualifier
daily day-night cycle rather than long-term gradual drought stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum
Capsicum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chili pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–131 · show in text ↑
e0

“Results of this study indicated that dynamic changes of RLER were mainly driven by daily day-night cycle rather than long-term gradual drought stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1289 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Specific leaf fresh weight did not significantly decrease during drought stress.

Taxon
chili pepperCapsicumt0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
SLFWe0
Direction
did not significantly decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum
Capsicum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chili pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–131 · show in text ↑
e0

“SLFW and SLWC did not significantly decrease during drought stress period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1290–1364 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Specific leaf water content did not significantly decrease during drought stress.

Taxon
chili pepperCapsicumt0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
SLWCe0
Direction
did not significantly decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum
Capsicum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chili pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–131 · show in text ↑
e0

“SLFW and SLWC did not significantly decrease during drought stress period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1290–1364 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress significantly inhibited total leaf area.

Taxon
chili pepperCapsicumt0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
TLAe0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum
Capsicum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chili pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–131 · show in text ↑
e0

“However, drought stress significantly inhibited TLA in chili pepper.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1365–1433 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chili pepper recovered after four days of drought stress.

Taxon
chili pepperCapsicumt0
Treatment
short-term (4 days) exposure to drought stresse0
Outcome
able to recovere0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum
Capsicum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chili pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–131 · show in text ↑
e0

“Chili pepper was able to recover from short-term (4 days) exposure to drought stress; yet, this crop was unable to recover after 8 days exposure to drought stress or longer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1434–1607 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chili pepper did not recover after eight days or longer of drought stress.

Taxon
chili pepperCapsicumt0
Treatment
8 days exposure to drought stress or longere0
Outcome
unable to recovere0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum
Capsicum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chili pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–131 · show in text ↑
e0

“Chili pepper was able to recover from short-term (4 days) exposure to drought stress; yet, this crop was unable to recover after 8 days exposure to drought stress or longer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1434–1607 · show in text ↑

drought · growth · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 3 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.