View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Average seedling dry weight did not decrease after acetone immersion.
OutcomeAverage seedling dry weight e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “8 hours of immersion in acetone. Average seedling dry weight , however, did not decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–832 t0 “Sweet Corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–33 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
SO 2 exposure did not significantly decrease total dry weight relative to controls.
Outcometotal dry weight e0 Directionno significant decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “no significant decrease in the total dry weight of SO 2 ‐treated plants in comparison with controls ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–377 t0 “Polygonum cuspidatum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–97 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
UV-B did not significantly decrease lettuce shoot fresh or dry weight .
Outcomefresh/dry weight of the lettuce shoots e0 Directiondid not significantly decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “UV-B exposure did not significantly decrease the fresh/ dry weight of the lettuce shoots ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–500 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Al-gaimi root dry weight did not decrease under mild deficit.
TreatmentMild water deficit e0 Directionneither decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Mild water deficit affected Sindy-2 and Hab-Ahmar, while Al-gaimi was less affected with neither decrease in root dry weight nor change in dry weight . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–913 t0 “wheat cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–87 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Spurred anoda in terference did not decrease cotton branch dry weight in ultra narrow rows.
TreatmentSpurred anoda interference e0 InteractorSpurred anoda e0 weed Outcomecotton branch dry weight e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Spurred anoda in terference resulted in a decrease in cotton branch dry weight in WR but not in UNR. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1069 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
P. vaginatum shoot and root dry weight did not significantly decrease at 72 dS m-1.
Outcomeshoot and root dry weight e0 Directiondid not show significant decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “P. vaginatum and E. atrovirens did not show significant decrease in shoot and root dry weight at highest salinity levels (72 dS m-1). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1081 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
High humidity did not decrease maize fresh or dry weight .
Treatment>95% relative humidity e1 Outcomegrowth (fresh weight and dry weight) e0 Directionneither a decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “there was neither a decrease in growth (fresh weight and dry weight ) nor in ash content of the ‘humid’plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–487 e1 “Maize plants were grown with nutrients supplied at adequate levels in hydroculture or in soil at 50–60% and at >95% relative humidity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–277 e2 “there was neither a decrease in growth (fresh weight and dry weight ) nor in ash content of the ‘humid’plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–487 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Anaerobiosis did not affect dry weight loss in seedlings younger than two days.
Organ / stageyounger than 2 days e0 Treatmentanaerobic treatment e0 Outcomerate of dry weight decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In seedlings younger than 2 days the rate of dry weight decrease was not affected by the anaerobic treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–653 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Four kg/ha in in dividual zones did not decrease English pea height or dry weight .
Treatment4 kg/ha in only the shoot, seed, or root zones e0 Outcomeseedling height or dry weight e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Application of 4 kg/ha in only the shoot, seed, or root zones of English pea did not decrease seedling height or dry weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1543–1666 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect At 10 -3 M, metolachlor reduced germination by less than 10% in corn, English pea and sicklepod. Intervention effect At 10 -3 M, metolachlor reduced wheat germination by less than 10%. Intervention effect At 10 -3 M, oat germination fell to 0. Intervention effect At 10 -3 M, lettuce germination fell to 11%. Intervention effect At 10 -3 M, peanut germination fell to 14%. Intervention effect A 10 -6 M metolachlor concentration did not affect germination of tested species. Intervention effect A 10 -5 M concentration did not significantly decrease corn, morningglory or wheat root length and fresh weight. Intervention effect At 10 -5 M, metolachlor adversely affected other tested species. Intervention effect At 10 -5 M, English pea root length was less than two-thirds of control. Intervention effect At 10 -5 M, cucumber root length was less than two-thirds of control. Intervention effect At 10 -5 M, radish root length was less than two-thirds of control. Intervention effect At 10 -5 M, sicklepod root length was less than two-thirds of control. Intervention effect At 10 -5 M, soybean root length was less than two-thirds of control. Intervention effect One kg/ha in the shoot zone significantly reduced barley seedling height and dry weight. Intervention effect One kg/ha in the shoot zone significantly reduced corn seedling height and dry weight. Intervention effect Shoot-zone treatment was ineffective in the seed or root zone, while all-zone treatment was about twice as detrimental. Intervention effect Four kg/ha in all zones decreased English pea seedling height and dry weight about 98%. Intervention effect At 10 -5 M, metolachlor decreased leucine uptake in cucumber root tips but not incorporation into protein. Intervention effect At 10 -4 M, metolachlor strongly reduced leucine uptake and slightly decreased incorporation into protein. Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
More shade did not decrease final dry weight for Yours Truly.
Treatmentshade increased e0 Outcomefinal dry weight e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “As shade in creased, final dry weight decrease d for ‘Sooner Red’ but not for ‘Yours Truly’ ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1265 t0 “Geraniums ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–124 Other claims from this paper (12) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.