View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf and root dry weight did not decrease significantly.
Outcomeleaf and root dry weight e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “while leaf and root dry weight did not ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 250–288 t0 “carnation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–35 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Average seedling dry weight did not decrease after acetone immersion.
OutcomeAverage seedling dry weight e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “8 hours of immersion in acetone. Average seedling dry weight , however, did not decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–832 t0 “Sweet Corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–33 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
SO 2 exposure did not significantly decrease total dry weight relative to controls.
Outcometotal dry weight e0 Directionno significant decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “no significant decrease in the total dry weight of SO 2 ‐treated plants in comparison with controls ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–377 t0 “Polygonum cuspidatum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–97 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
UV-B did not significantly decrease lettuce shoot fresh or dry weight .
Outcomefresh/dry weight of the lettuce shoots e0 Directiondid not significantly decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “UV-B exposure did not significantly decrease the fresh/ dry weight of the lettuce shoots ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–500 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
At 2 mM Al, citric acid did not significantly decrease dry weight .
Directionno significant decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “Citric acid increased fresh weight by 8%, had no significant decrease on dry weight , but significantly decrease d chlorophyll content by 16% (Al2 CA5 vs. Al2 CA0) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–897 e1 “At 2 mM Al ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–581 t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–33 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Al-gaimi root dry weight did not decrease under mild deficit.
TreatmentMild water deficit e0 Directionneither decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Mild water deficit affected Sindy-2 and Hab-Ahmar, while Al-gaimi was less affected with neither decrease in root dry weight nor change in dry weight . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–913 t0 “wheat cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–87 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Chlorflurenol did not significantly decrease plant fresh and dry weight .
Treatmentthis morphactin e0 Outcomefresh and dry weights e0 Directiondid not significantly decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “However, this morphactin did not significantly decrease the fresh and dry weight s of plants. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–421 t0 “TOURNESOL ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–105 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Spurred anoda interference did not decrease cotton branch dry weight in ultra narrow rows.
TreatmentSpurred anoda interference e0 InteractorSpurred anoda e0 weed Outcomecotton branch dry weight e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Spurred anoda interference resulted in a decrease in cotton branch dry weight in WR but not in UNR. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1069 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
P. vaginatum shoot and root dry weight did not significantly decrease at 72 dS m-1.
Outcomeshoot and root dry weight e0 Directiondid not show significant decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “P. vaginatum and E. atrovirens did not show significant decrease in shoot and root dry weight at highest salinity levels (72 dS m-1). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1081 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
High humidity did not decrease maize fresh or dry weight .
Treatment>95% relative humidity e1 Outcomegrowth (fresh weight and dry weight) e0 Directionneither a decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “there was neither a decrease in growth (fresh weight and dry weight ) nor in ash content of the ‘humid’plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–487 e1 “Maize plants were grown with nutrients supplied at adequate levels in hydroculture or in soil at 50–60% and at >95% relative humidity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–277 e2 “there was neither a decrease in growth (fresh weight and dry weight ) nor in ash content of the ‘humid’plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–487 Other claims from this paper (4) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.