View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) simulated Claim · model-written summary
Sensor errors in pasture measurement did not have a significant financial cost to farmers when recommended techniques were followed.
Sensor errors for pasture measurement e2 if recommended measurement techniques are closely followed e2 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e2 “Sensor errors for pasture measurement were shown not to have a significant financial cost to farmers if recommended measurement techniques are closely followed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1112 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Optimizing base temperature or adding an upper threshold by growth stage did not substantially reduce errors in predicting cotton growth-stage dates.
Optimization of base temperature and inclusion of an upper threshold by growth stage e3 errors in predicting date of growth stage occurrence e3 no_change inferred e3 did not substantially e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–40 e3 “Optimization of base temperature and inclusion of an upper threshold by growth stage did not substantially decrease errors in predicting date of growth stage occurrence ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1352 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Equivalent radiation doses produced only small differences in mitotic index, within possible dosimetry error.
radiations of different Let e0 hardly greater than possible errors in dosimetry e1 equivalent doses e0 Verbatim
e0 “Vicia faba-tips treated with equivalent doses of radiations of different Let
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 85–161 e1 “Differences in the mitotic index are small, hardly greater than possible errors in dosimetry ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 163–255 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Separate missing rows did not reduce soybean yield compared with no error.
did not reduce e0 Verbatim
e0 “Single and Separate planter error did not reduce yield compared with None. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1489–1563 t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–61 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
A single missing row did not reduce soybean yield compared with no error.
did not reduce e0 Verbatim
e0 “Single and Separate planter error did not reduce yield compared with None. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1489–1563 t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–61 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Infiltration left transient lag duration unchanged after light and dark treatments.
duration of transient lags e0 remained unchanged e0 following light and dark treatments e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The duration of transient lags following light and dark treatments remained unchanged by infiltration ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–693 t0 “Egeria densa Planch.
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 104–124 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Photoperiod extension generally did not affect harvest index.
position nearest the lamps e0 Verbatim
e0 “Extending the photoperiod to 14.5 h throughout the life cycle of six cultivars increasingly delayed ontogenic events as the distance from the photoperiod lamps decreased. However, no influence on harvest index was observed except at the position nearest the lamps where the standard errors of the harvest indices were increased ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1652 t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–20 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Higher fertilization had no significant effect on panicle number or grain count per panicle.
higher application levels e0 panicle number or grain count per panicle e0 no significant effect e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Fertilization results showed that higher application levels significantly increased the grain-filling rate and thousand-grain weight (both p < 0.001), but had no significant effect on panicle number or grain count per panicle (p > 0.05). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1357 e7 “on a rice field ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–627 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Gossypium hirsutum
Vicia faba
Glycine max
Egeria
Oryza sativa