Refine ·

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Clear filters
Intervention effectobservedreview summarymeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The review reports SWP uses 15% less water than AWD.

Treatment
SWPe0
Outcome
water usee0
Direction
lesse0
Value
15%e0
Comparator
AWDe0

Verbatim

e0

“SWP results in 15% less water use than AWD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1099
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–14

Title

Enhancing Rice Productivity through Sustainable Water Management Practices

Gurkaran Singh; Harshpreet; Munish Kaundal Journal of Experimental Agriculture International 2025. doi:10.9734/jeai/2025/v47i73587

Other claims from this paper (7)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato fruit yield decreased at SWP of 20 kPa.

Treatment
SWP of 20 kPae0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6
e0

“while in variants with higher (SWP of 20 kPa) and lower (SWP of 40 kPa) soil moisture fruit yield decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–962

Title

TOMATO FRUIT YIELD AND EVAPOTRANSPIRATION IN THE CONDITIONS OF SOUTH SERBIA

M. Aksić; S. Gudžić; N. Deletić; et al. 2011

Other claims from this paper (5)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato fruit yield decreased at SWP of 40 kPa.

Treatment
SWP of 40 kPae0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6
e0

“while in variants with higher (SWP of 20 kPa) and lower (SWP of 40 kPa) soil moisture fruit yield decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–962

Title

TOMATO FRUIT YIELD AND EVAPOTRANSPIRATION IN THE CONDITIONS OF SOUTH SERBIA

M. Aksić; S. Gudžić; N. Deletić; et al. 2011

Other claims from this paper (5)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fall SWP-SKW reduced wheat protein content.

Treatment
Fall SWP‐SKWe0
Outcome
Wheat protein contente0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat protein content was also reduced in the Fall SWP‐SKW tillage treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1261

Title

Precipitation, Temperature and Tillage Effects upon Productivity of a Winter Wheat–Dry Pea Rotation

William A. Payne; Paul E. Rasmussen; C. Chen; et al. Agronomy Journal 2000. doi:10.2134/agronj2000.925933x

Other claims from this paper (8)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato WUE and IWUE were highest at SWP of 30 kPa.

Treatment
SWP of 30 kPae0
Outcome
WUE and IWUEe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The highest values of WUE and IWUE for tomato were reached in the variant with SWP of 30 kPa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1239

Title

TOMATO FRUIT YIELD AND EVAPOTRANSPIRATION IN THE CONDITIONS OF SOUTH SERBIA

M. Aksić; S. Gudžić; N. Deletić; et al. 2011

Other claims from this paper (5)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato fruit yield was highest at SWP of 30 kPa in both years.

Treatment
SWP of 30 kPae0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6
e0

“Observing both investigation years, the highest fruit yield was reached at the variant with SWP of 30 kPa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–853

Title

TOMATO FRUIT YIELD AND EVAPOTRANSPIRATION IN THE CONDITIONS OF SOUTH SERBIA

M. Aksić; S. Gudžić; N. Deletić; et al. 2011

Other claims from this paper (5)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Actively growing cover crops lowered soil water potential (SWP) compared with no cover crop management.

Taxon
CCse1
Treatment
actively growing CCse1
Outcome
SWPe1
Direction
lowere1
Comparator
cover crop (NC) managemente2

Verbatim

e1

“Results showed that actively growing CCs can lower SWP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–949
e2

“cover crop (NC) management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1050

Title

Does no-till cover crop influence in situ measured soil water potential and saturated hydraulic conductivity?

Olivia Peters; Samuel I. Haruna Soil and Water Research 2024. doi:10.17221/27/2024-swr

Other claims from this paper (3)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigator Pro initiated irrigation earlier than SWP management.

Treatment
Irrigator Pro-managed treatmentse0
Outcome
irrigatione0
Direction
earliere0
Comparator
treatments managed with SWP measurementse0

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigator Pro-managed treatments initiated irrigation earlier in the season than for treatments managed with SWP measurements”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1115
e1

“variable rate irrigation experiments on peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–329

Title

Variable-Rate Irrigation Management for Peanut in the Eastern Coastal Plain

Kenneth C Stone; Philip J Bauer; Warren J Busscher; et al. 5th National Decennial Irrigation Conference Proceedings, 5-8 December 2010, Phoenix Convention Center, Phoenix, Arizona USA 2010. doi:10.13031/2013.35857

Other claims from this paper (2)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Decreasing SWP decreased fruit concentration of these ions.

Treatment
Decreasing SWPe0
Outcome
fruit concentration of these ionse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–127
e0

“Decreasing SWP either had no effect or increased leaf Ca, Mg, and K concentrations but decreased fruit concentration of these ions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–678

Title

Effects of Soil Water Regime and Nitrogen Form on Blossom-end Rot, Yield, Water Relations, and Elemental Composition of Tomato1

W. G. Pill; V. N. Lambeth Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 1980. doi:10.21273/jashs.105.5.730

Other claims from this paper (17)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fall SWP-SKW reduced wheat yield by about 400 kg ha −1.

Treatment
Fall SWP‐SKWe0
Outcome
Wheat yielde1
Direction
lesse0
Value
∼400 kg ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“was ∼400 kg ha −1 less for the Fall SWP‐SKW treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1183
e1

“Wheat yield was more influenced by winter than spring precipitation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1124
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–82

Title

Precipitation, Temperature and Tillage Effects upon Productivity of a Winter Wheat–Dry Pea Rotation

William A. Payne; Paul E. Rasmussen; C. Chen; et al. Agronomy Journal 2000. doi:10.2134/agronj2000.925933x

Other claims from this paper (8)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.