View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed review summary measured Claim · model-written summary
The review reports SWP uses 15% less water than AWD.
Verbatim
e0 “SWP results in 15% less water use than AWD ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1099 t0 “Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–14 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Tomato fruit yield decreased at SWP of 20 kPa.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “TOMATO ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 e0 “while in variants with higher ( SWP of 20 kPa) and lower ( SWP of 40 kPa) soil moisture fruit yield decreased ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–962 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Tomato fruit yield decreased at SWP of 40 kPa.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “TOMATO ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 e0 “while in variants with higher ( SWP of 20 kPa) and lower ( SWP of 40 kPa) soil moisture fruit yield decreased ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–962 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Fall SWP -SKW reduced wheat protein content.
OutcomeWheat protein content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Wheat protein content was also reduced in the Fall SWP ‐SKW tillage treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1261 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Tomato WUE and IWUE were highest at SWP of 30 kPa.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The highest values of WUE and IWUE for tomato were reached in the variant with SWP of 30 kPa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1239 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Tomato fruit yield was highest at SWP of 30 kPa in both years.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “TOMATO ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 e0 “Observing both investigation years, the highest fruit yield was reached at the variant with SWP of 30 kPa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–853 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Actively growing cover crops lowered soil water potential ( SWP ) compared with no cover crop management.
Treatmentactively growing CCs e1 Comparatorcover crop (NC) management e2 Verbatim
e1 “Results showed that actively growing CCs can lower SWP ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–949 e2 “cover crop (NC) management ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1050 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Irrigator Pro initiated irrigation earlier than SWP management.
TreatmentIrrigator Pro-managed treatments e0 Comparatortreatments managed with SWP measurements e0 Verbatim
e0 “Irrigator Pro-managed treatments initiated irrigation earlier in the season than for treatments managed with SWP measurements ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1115 e1 “variable rate irrigation experiments on peanut ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–329 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Decreasing SWP decreased fruit concentration of these ions.
TreatmentDecreasing SWP e0 Outcomefruit concentration of these ions e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Tomato1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–127 e0 “Decreasing SWP either had no effect or increased leaf Ca, Mg, and K concentrations but decreased fruit concentration of these ions. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–678 Other claims from this paper (17) Intervention effect Decreasing soil water potential reduced fruit number, set, mean fruit weight, and total fruit weight. Intervention effect Under wetter regimes, NH 4 -N reduced total and mean fruit weights versus NO 3 -N. Intervention effect Under wetter regimes, NH 4 -N increased fruit number versus NO 3 -N. Intervention effect The nitrogen forms showed no differences in fruit weight or number under the driest regime. Intervention effect NH 4 nutrition increased blossom-end rot incidence and severity. Intervention effect decreasing soil water potential increased blossom-end rot incidence and severity. Intervention effect Decreasing SWP increased leaf Ca, Mg, and K concentrations. Intervention effect NH 4 fertilization decreased leaf Ca and Mg concentration. Intervention effect NH 4 fertilization increased leaf K and fruit Ca, Mg, and K concentrations. Association Blossom-end rot was associated with higher stylar-to-calyx concentration ratios of Ca, Mg, and K. Association Blossom-end rot incidence and severity did not appear related to fruit Ca, Mg, and K concentration. Intervention effect Basal leaf xylem pressure potential was unaffected by nitrogen nutrition. Intervention effect Basal leaf xylem pressure potential was greater under the wettest regime. Intervention effect With NO 3 -N, minimal and mean light-saturation pressure potential declined as soil water potential decreased. Intervention effect With NH 4 -N, pressure potential was constant across soil water regimes. Intervention effect Leaf diffusive resistance increased with decreasing soil water potential. Intervention effect Nitrogen form did not affect leaf diffusive resistance. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Fall SWP -SKW reduced wheat yield by about 400 kg ha −1.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “was ∼400 kg ha −1 less for the Fall SWP ‐SKW treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1183 e1 “Wheat yield was more influenced by winter than spring precipitation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1124 t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–82 Other claims from this paper (8) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.