View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Defoliation caused a substantial decrease in wheat root density .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Temporary growth cessation of wheat roots following defoliation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–63 e2 “This caused a substantial decrease in root density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–934 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
A suitable decrease in sowing density in creased panicle rate.
Treatmentsuitable decrease of sowing density e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “suitable decrease of sowing density is beneficial to in crease panicle rate ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–414 t0 “Early Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–73 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Under low plant density the overall soybean yield may slightly decrease .
TreatmentLow plant density e3 Qualifiermay slightly decrease e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–60 e3 “Low plant density helps improve in dividual plant growth and nutrient use efficiency, although the overall yield may slightly decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–421 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Fumigation did not decrease purple nutsedge density .
Interactorpurple nutsedge e0 weed Outcomepurple nutsedge density e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Eggplant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–99 e0 “Fumigation and fomesafen did not decrease purple nutsedge density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1358 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Fomesafen did not decrease purple nutsedge density .
Interactorpurple nutsedge e0 weed Outcomepurple nutsedge density e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Eggplant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–99 e0 “Fumigation and fomesafen did not decrease purple nutsedge density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1358 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The mitochondrial pool decrease affected low- and in termediate- density mitochondria.
Treatmentglucose-starved e1 Outcomelow- and intermediate-density mitochondria e0 Comparatorhigher-density mitochondria e0 Verbatim
e0 “this decrease affected low- and in termediate- density mitochondria, but not higher- density mitochondria ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1358–1460 e1 “preparations from glucose-starved maize root tips ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1180 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Soil treatments had the slowest density decrease in the 1999 planting.
Treatmentsoil treatments e0 Directionslowest decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “highest in itial emergence and slowest decrease in density occurring in soil treatments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1362 e1 “Disturbance only affected the 1999 planting ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1269 e2 “measured forage kochia density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–733 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing planting density decrease Tiller numbers in hill in rice.
Treatmentplanting density e0 OutcomeTiller numbers in hill e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Tiller numbers in hill was decrease with in creasing of planting density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1092 t0 “rice (Oryza sativa L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–132 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Both application timings caused a similar decrease in subsequent pest population density .
Outcomepest population density e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “leading to a similar decrease in pest population density in the following year ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–890 t0 “cork oak forests ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–125 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Management relaxation was associated with a decrease in vegetation density .
Treatmentmanagement relaxation e1 Outcomevegetation density e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “mountain grasslands ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–88 e1 “A higher butterfly abundance and species richness following management relaxation was mostly driven by a decrease in vegetation density and an in crease in forb cover. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1374 Other claims from this paper (2) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.