View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon: maize ✕
Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The mitochondrial pool decrease affected low- and in termediate- density mitochondria.
Treatmentglucose-starved e1 Outcomelow- and intermediate-density mitochondria e0 Comparatorhigher-density mitochondria e0 Verbatim
e0 “this decrease affected low- and in termediate- density mitochondria, but not higher- density mitochondria ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1358–1460 e1 “preparations from glucose-starved maize root tips ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1180 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing planting density caused a linear decrease in the 100-grain weight of maize.
Treatmentplanting density e1 Outcome100-grain weight e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “PRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE OF MAIZE CROP ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–36 e1 “The in crement of planting density caused a linear decrease in the 100-grain weight and in crement of the cob percentage in relation to the total ear weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–885 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
In creased N supply weakened the decrease in KNP and TKW caused by enhanced density .
TreatmentIncreased N supply e0 Outcomedecreased KNP and TKW caused by enhanced density e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 e0 “In creased N supply weakened the decrease d KNP and TKW caused by enhanced density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1018 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
At 45 cm spacing, maize yield tended to decrease with in creasing density in 2014.
Treatmentincreasing plant densities e0 Directiondecreasing tendency e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 e0 “in 2014, the yield showed decreasing tendency parallel to the in creasing plant densities ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1611–1699 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
In maize–legume in tercrops the decrease in available light for weeds led to a reduction of weed density and dry matter compared with sole crops.
Treatmentmaize–legume intercrops e0 Outcomeweed density and dry matter e0 Verbatim
e0 “in maize–legume in tercrops the decrease in available light for weeds led to a reduction of weed density and dry matter, compared to sole crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–931 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing plant density decrease d leaf angle in maize.
TreatmentIncreasing plant density e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Morphological Variation of Maize Cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–42 e1 “In creasing plant density resulted in a decrease in leaf angle; however, an in crease in LOV ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1270 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Mulching decrease d bulk density .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Mulching showed improvement in organic C and total N status, and a decrease in bulk density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1351 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 t1 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Zhengdan958 rind strength was unchanged except for a decrease in the third in ternode.
Outcomerind penetration strength e0 Comparatormedium density(52 500 plants/ha) e3 Verbatim
e0 “while Zhengdan958 was unchanged, except that the rind penetration strength of the third in ternode decrease d ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–883 e1 “maize cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–30 e2 “Under high density condition ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–711 e3 “medium density (52 500 plants/ha) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 116–148 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Higher density decrease d yield and yield components per plant.
Treatmentincrease in density e0 Outcomeyield and yield components per plant e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “in crease in density resulted in in crease in yield per hectare and decrease in yield and yield components per plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–544 e1 “Maize (Zea mays ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 126–142 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Supraoptimal density decrease d root numbers at upper levels.
Treatmentsupraoptimal plant density e0 Qualifierat upper internode and node levels e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “A supraoptimal plant density caused an in crease in lengths and a decrease in root numbers at upper in ternode and node levels. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–714 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–24 Other claims from this paper (10) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.