Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“decrease in dry weight”

10 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

plus 2 non-evaluative

Over time

2000 ’10 ’20

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

Taxon: peanut ✕

Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the later growth stage, the decrease of root dry matter weight of peanut was slower in clay soil than in loam and sandy soils.

Taxon: peanutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment: clay soile1
Outcome: decrease of root dry matter weighte1
Direction: slowe1
Comparator: loam and sandy soile1

Verbatim

t0
“in peanut”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–100

e1
“in the later growth stage, the decrease of root dry matter weight of peanut in clay soil is relative slow compared with peanut in loam and sandy soil”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–614

Title

Effects of different soil textures on the growth and distribution of root system and yield in peanut

Jia Li Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology 2013

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Root dry matter weight of peanut was significantly higher in sandy and loam soils than in clay soil.
Observation In clay soil, the root system of peanut was mainly distributed in the shallow soil layer.
Observation In clay soil, the decrease of root activity in the upper layers was slower in the late growth period.
Intervention effect Sandy soil was helpful for the root system of peanut to grow to the deeper soil layer.
Intervention effect Sandy soil favored enlargement of the peanut pod.
Intervention effect Dry matter accumulation of peanut pod in sandy soil was earlier and faster.
Intervention effect Dry matter accumulation in the later growth period was less in sandy soil.
Observation In loam soil, dry matter accumulation of peanut pod was mainly concentrated in middle and later periods.
Intervention effect Clay soil was not suitable for dry matter accumulation of peanut pod in the entire growth period.
Intervention effect Pod yield, kernel yield and available pod number were largest in loam soil, second in sandy soil and lowest in clay soil.
Recommendation The authors suggest loam soil, with mid-levels of aeration and water and fertilizer conservation, is most suitable for the growth and yield of peanut.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate root-cutting delayed the decrease in root dry weight at the late stage of peanut.

Taxon: PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment: Moderate root-cuttinge1
Outcome: root dry weight decreasede1
Direction: delaye1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Yield of Peanut”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–112

e1
“Moderate root-cutting could control the root system growth too fast at early stage and delay the root dry weight decreased at late stage”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 188–324

Title

Effects of Root Cutting in Different Depths on Root System Distribution,Senescence Character and Yield of Peanut

Guo Qin Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica 2015

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Moderate root-cutting slowed root system growth at the early stage of peanut.
Intervention effect Moderate root-cutting promoted root growth in deep soil of peanut.
Intervention effect Moderate root-cutting increased the proportion of middle and lower segments of the peanut root system.
Intervention effect Moderate root-cutting reduced root senescence in peanut by delaying the time of maximum root vigor, SOD and POD activity.
Intervention effect Moderate root-cutting reduced malondialdehyde (MDA) content in the root system of each soil layer of peanut.
Intervention effect Moderate root-cutting improved valid pods, pod yield and seed yield of peanut, whereas excessive root-cutting did not.
Recommendation The authors recommend a root-cutting depth of 10 to 15 cm for peanut.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Terminal drought significantly reduced peanut pod dry weight.

Taxon: peanutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment: Terminal droughte0
Outcome: peanut yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 7.98-8.89 g plant -1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Terminal drought significantly decrease root characteristics (0.83-1.03 g plant -1 of root dry weight) and peanut yield (7.98-8.89 g plant -1 of pod dry weight)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–1008

Title

Response of root characteristics and yield in peanut under terminal drought condition

Junya Junjittakarn; Teerayoot Girdthai; Sanun Jogloy; et al. Chilean journal of agricultural research 2014. doi:10.4067/s0718-58392014000300001

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Terminal drought significantly reduced peanut root characteristics.
Association Root length correlated with yield response to terminal drought.
Association Root volume correlated with yield response to terminal drought.
Association Other root traits were not correlated with yield response to terminal drought.
Observation KK60-3 had high root traits and maintained pod dry weight under terminal drought.
Observation Tifton 8 maintained biomass production.
Observation ICGV98348 had high root traits and maintained pod dry weight and harvest index under drought.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging decreased the ratio of pod dry weight to total dry weight (PDW/TDW) and yield of peanut.

Taxon: peanutArachis hypogaeae2
Material: Zhongkaihua 1 (ZKH 1) and Huayu 39 (HY 39)e2
Organ / stage: flowering stagee2
Treatment: waterlogging stresse2
Outcome: ratio of pod dry weight to total dry weight (PDW/TDW) and yielde3
Direction: decreasee3
Comparator: normal water supplye2

Verbatim

e2
“Physiological and transcriptome data of two peanut cultivars [Zhongkaihua 1 (ZKH 1) and Huayu 39 (HY 39)] were studied under normal water supply and waterlogging stress for 5 or 10 days at the flowering stage”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 49–257

e3
“the imbalance of the source-sink relationship led to the accumulation of photosynthate in the stems and leaves, which resulted in the decrease of the ratio of pod dry weight to total dry weight (PDW/TDW) and yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1338

Title

Physiological and Expressional Regulation on Photosynthesis, Starch and Sucrose Metabolism Response to Waterlogging Stress in Peanut

Ruier Zeng; Tingting Chen; Xinyue Wang; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2021. doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.601771

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Waterlogging increased the main stem height, number of lateral branches and lateral branch length of peanut.
Intervention effect Waterlogging increased the stem diameter of peanut.
Intervention effect Waterlogging increased dry matter accumulation in peanut.
Association Dry matter accumulation under waterlogging was correlated with increases in SPAD and net photosynthetic rate (Pn) of peanut.
Intervention effect Waterlogging increased SPAD and net photosynthetic rate (Pn) in peanut.
Intervention effect Waterlogging upregulated genes related to porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism and photosynthesis in peanut.
Mechanism The imbalance of the source-sink relationship under waterlogging was the main cause of peanut yield loss.
Intervention effect Waterlogging increased sucrose and soluble sugar contents in peanut.
Intervention effect Waterlogging decreased starch content in peanut.
Intervention effect Waterlogging decreased the activities of sucrose synthetase (SS) and sucrose phosphate synthetase (SPS) in peanut.
Mechanism The decreased sucrose synthetase and SPS activities under waterlogging may be due to changes in the expression of genes related to starch and sucrose metabolism.
Intervention effect Waterlogging caused photosynthate to accumulate in the stems and leaves of peanut.
Association Peanut cultivar HY 39 had a larger decrease in pod dry weight than ZKH 1 under waterlogging.
Mechanism Peanut cultivar HY 39 accumulated more photosynthate in its stem and leaves, which probably prevented effective transport to the pod.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc fertilization decreased peanut shoot dry weight relative to the zinc-free control.

Taxon: peanutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment: Zince2
Outcome: shoot dry weighte2
Direction: decreaseinferrede2
Qualifier: 18.52 g pot−1e2
Comparator: control treatmente2

Verbatim

e0
“agronomic efficiency (AE) of peanut grown in sandy soil”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 217–272

e2
“Zinc significantly affected shoot dry weight, with the highest biomass observed in the control treatment (18.52 g pot−1), but had limited influence on reproductive and yield traits.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–614

Title

Boron availability appears more strongly associated with peanut yield response than zinc in sandy soil

Benjapon Kunlanit; Wimonsiri Pingthaisong; Ratanaporn Poosathit; et al. Cogent Food & Agriculture 2026. doi:10.1080/23311932.2026.2644617

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Zinc fertilization had limited influence on peanut reproductive and yield traits.
Intervention effect Boron significantly enhanced peanut pod- and seed-related parameters.
Intervention effect Boron increased total seed weight of peanut by 46–51%.
Intervention effect The highest mean peanut yield was recorded at 0.006–0.017 g B pot−1.
Observation Principal component analysis explained 81.4% of total variance in peanut yield traits.
Association Pod number and seed-filling traits were the primary contributors to peanut yield variation.
Intervention effect Zinc agronomic efficiency was negative at all rates.
Observation Boron agronomic efficiency reached 513.3 g seed increase g−1 B at 0.006 g B pot−1.
Observation Boron agronomic efficiency remained positive at 0.017 g B pot−1.
Association Boron availability was likely a more important constraint on peanut than zinc in this sandy soil.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Peanut dry weight with BPS was 5941.5 kg/ha and differed significantly from insecticide treatment.

Taxon: peanutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment: BPSe0
Outcome: dry weight of peanute0
Value: 5941.5 kg/hae0
Comparator: 40%isofenphos-methyl solutione0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“The rate of grub decrease(95.7%)and the dry weight of peanut(5941.5 kg/ha)with BPS were significant different(P0.05)to that of with 40%isofenphos-methyl solution(82.7%,303.8 kg).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–677

Title

Application Technology of Steinernema longicaudum BPS Strain in Peanut Fields for Chafer Grub Control

DU Xiao-kang Agrochemicals 2009

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effect At 5000 IJs per plant, BPS produced 3.1% injured peanut legumes, below chemical insecticide at 9.0% and tap water at 53.2%.
Intervention effect BPS achieved a 95.7% grub decrease, compared with 82.7% under isofenphos-methyl.
Intervention effect BPS application with irrigation performed better than spraying.
Intervention effect Combining BPS with Rhabditis sp. showed no interaction effect for grub control.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

BPS achieved a 95.7% grub decrease, compared with 82.7% under isofenphos-methyl.

Taxon: PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment: BPSe0
Outcome: grub decreasee0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 95.7%e0
Qualifier: 82.7%e0
Comparator: 40%isofenphos-methyl solutione0

Verbatim

e0
“The rate of grub decrease(95.7%)and the dry weight of peanut(5941.5 kg/ha)with BPS were significant different(P0.05)to that of with 40%isofenphos-methyl solution(82.7%,303.8 kg).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–677

t0
“Peanut Fields”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–77

Title

Application Technology of Steinernema longicaudum BPS Strain in Peanut Fields for Chafer Grub Control

DU Xiao-kang Agrochemicals 2009

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effect At 5000 IJs per plant, BPS produced 3.1% injured peanut legumes, below chemical insecticide at 9.0% and tap water at 53.2%.
Intervention effect Peanut dry weight with BPS was 5941.5 kg/ha and differed significantly from insecticide treatment.
Intervention effect BPS application with irrigation performed better than spraying.
Intervention effect Combining BPS with Rhabditis sp. showed no interaction effect for grub control.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Terminal drought significantly reduced peanut root characteristics.

Taxon: peanutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment: Terminal droughte0
Outcome: root characteristicse0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 0.83-1.03 g plant -1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Terminal drought significantly decrease root characteristics (0.83-1.03 g plant -1 of root dry weight)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–950

t0
“peanut”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–52

Title

Response of root characteristics and yield in peanut under terminal drought condition

Junya Junjittakarn; Teerayoot Girdthai; Sanun Jogloy; et al. Chilean journal of agricultural research 2014. doi:10.4067/s0718-58392014000300001

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Terminal drought significantly reduced peanut pod dry weight.
Association Root length correlated with yield response to terminal drought.
Association Root volume correlated with yield response to terminal drought.
Association Other root traits were not correlated with yield response to terminal drought.
Observation KK60-3 had high root traits and maintained pod dry weight under terminal drought.
Observation Tifton 8 maintained biomass production.
Observation ICGV98348 had high root traits and maintained pod dry weight and harvest index under drought.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate root-cutting slowed root system growth at the early stage of peanut.

Taxon: PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
Organ / stage: root systeme1
Treatment: Moderate root-cuttinge1
Outcome: root system growthe1
Direction: decreaseinferrede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Yield of Peanut”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–112

e1
“Moderate root-cutting could control the root system growth too fast at early stage and delay the root dry weight decreased at late stage”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 188–324

Title

Effects of Root Cutting in Different Depths on Root System Distribution,Senescence Character and Yield of Peanut

Guo Qin Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica 2015

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Moderate root-cutting delayed the decrease in root dry weight at the late stage of peanut.
Intervention effect Moderate root-cutting promoted root growth in deep soil of peanut.
Intervention effect Moderate root-cutting increased the proportion of middle and lower segments of the peanut root system.
Intervention effect Moderate root-cutting reduced root senescence in peanut by delaying the time of maximum root vigor, SOD and POD activity.
Intervention effect Moderate root-cutting reduced malondialdehyde (MDA) content in the root system of each soil layer of peanut.
Intervention effect Moderate root-cutting improved valid pods, pod yield and seed yield of peanut, whereas excessive root-cutting did not.
Recommendation The authors recommend a root-cutting depth of 10 to 15 cm for peanut.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging caused photosynthate to accumulate in the stems and leaves of peanut.

Taxon: peanutArachis hypogaeae2
Material: Zhongkaihua 1 (ZKH 1) and Huayu 39 (HY 39)e2
Organ / stage: flowering stagee2
Treatment: waterlogging stresse2
Outcome: accumulation of photosynthate in the stems and leavese3
Direction: increaseinferrede3
Comparator: normal water supplye2

Verbatim

e2
“Physiological and transcriptome data of two peanut cultivars [Zhongkaihua 1 (ZKH 1) and Huayu 39 (HY 39)] were studied under normal water supply and waterlogging stress for 5 or 10 days at the flowering stage”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 49–257

e3
“the imbalance of the source-sink relationship led to the accumulation of photosynthate in the stems and leaves, which resulted in the decrease of the ratio of pod dry weight to total dry weight (PDW/TDW) and yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1338

Title

Physiological and Expressional Regulation on Photosynthesis, Starch and Sucrose Metabolism Response to Waterlogging Stress in Peanut

Ruier Zeng; Tingting Chen; Xinyue Wang; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2021. doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.601771

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Waterlogging increased the main stem height, number of lateral branches and lateral branch length of peanut.
Intervention effect Waterlogging increased the stem diameter of peanut.
Intervention effect Waterlogging increased dry matter accumulation in peanut.
Association Dry matter accumulation under waterlogging was correlated with increases in SPAD and net photosynthetic rate (Pn) of peanut.
Intervention effect Waterlogging increased SPAD and net photosynthetic rate (Pn) in peanut.
Intervention effect Waterlogging upregulated genes related to porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism and photosynthesis in peanut.
Mechanism The imbalance of the source-sink relationship under waterlogging was the main cause of peanut yield loss.
Intervention effect Waterlogging increased sucrose and soluble sugar contents in peanut.
Intervention effect Waterlogging decreased starch content in peanut.
Intervention effect Waterlogging decreased the activities of sucrose synthetase (SS) and sucrose phosphate synthetase (SPS) in peanut.
Mechanism The decreased sucrose synthetase and SPS activities under waterlogging may be due to changes in the expression of genes related to starch and sucrose metabolism.
Intervention effect Waterlogging decreased the ratio of pod dry weight to total dry weight (PDW/TDW) and yield of peanut.
Association Peanut cultivar HY 39 had a larger decrease in pod dry weight than ZKH 1 under waterlogging.
Mechanism Peanut cultivar HY 39 accumulated more photosynthate in its stem and leaves, which probably prevented effective transport to the pod.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“decrease in dry weight”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics