Refine ·

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Clear filters
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

DBH showed no significant difference between P2U MLS and RTC360 TLS.

Taxon
Urban Street Treest0
Outcome
DBHe1
Direction
no significant differencee1
Value
p=0.6078e1
Comparator
RTC360e0

Verbatim

t0

“Inter-Sensor Error Analysis between TLS and MLS for Urban Street Trees toward Digital Twin Development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102
e0

“P2U tended to underestimate TreeHeight and crown-related metrics compared with RTC360 (Δ TreeHeight=−1.02m; ΔCrownVolume=−103.38m³ )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–885
e1

“while DBH showed no significant difference (Wilcoxon p=0.6078)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–949

Title

Inter-Sensor Error Analysis between TLS and MLS for Urban Street Trees toward Digital Twin Development

Yongbum Park; Gunwon Lee KIEAE Journal 2026. doi:10.12813/kieae.2026.26.1.055

Other claims from this paper (6)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Using an artificial background did not significantly improve estimation accuracy (R2=0.70) compared with no background acquisition for grapevine pruning wood weight.

Taxon
grapevineVitise1
Treatment
artificial backgrounde0
Outcome
estimation accuracye0
Direction
did not significantly improvee0
Value
R2=0.70e0
Comparator
no background acquisition modee0

Verbatim

e1

“Pruning wood mass is a key factor in grapevine management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–57
e0

“Results showed that using an artificial background did not significantly improve estimation accuracy (R2=0.70) compared with no background acquisition mode (R2=0.69)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1222

Title

Improved Image Acquisition for Accurate Pruning Wood Weight Estimation via Image Analysis in

Stefano Puccio; Daniele Miccichè; Lucia Turano; et al. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) 2026. doi:10.1051/bioconf/202623505004/pdf

Other claims from this paper (1)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

For Kenya samples, sorting gave a mean aflatoxin difference of -0.28 log10 (ng/g), not significant (p=0.08).

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
mean differencee2
Value
-0.28 log 10 (ng/g)e2
Setting
Kenyae2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“reduce aflatoxin in bulk maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–55
e2

“Kenya sample’s mean difference was -0.28 log 10 (ng/g) (p=0.08 by paired t test)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1089

Title

Multispectral sorting to reduce aflatoxin in bulk maize retains some efficacy when tested under less controlled field conditions

Julie W. Hwang; Ruben A. Chavez; Asha B. Mohamed; et al. Food and Humanity 2026. doi:10.1016/j.foohum.2026.101314

Other claims from this paper (5)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plate metre calibration showed no significant difference between sward types

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee1
Outcome
Plate metre calibratione7
Value
p > 0.05e7
Comparator
sward typese7

Verbatim

e1

“This study investigated the agronomic performance and root characteristics of perennial ryegrass and mixed perennial ryegrass–plantain swards under intensive rotational grazing by dairy cows in Northern Ireland over two full grazing seasons (2023–2024)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–261
e7

“Plate metre calibration showed no significant difference ( p > 0.05) between sward types, validating the use of a common equation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1455

Title

Agronomic Performance of Perennial Ryegrass ( Lolium perenne L)—Ribwort Plantain ( Plantago lanceolata L) and Perennial Ryegrass Swards Under Intensive Dairy Cow Grazing

Lauren Elizabeth Chesney; Naomi Rutherford; Francesca Carnovale; et al. Grass and Forage Science 2026. doi:10.1111/gfs.70041

Other claims from this paper (17)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Torula and palm sap were the best food baits for fruit flies in guava orchards, with no significant difference between them

Treatment
Torulae2
Interactor
Fruit Fliest0pest
Outcome
best attractantse2
Comparator
palm sape2

Verbatim

t0

“Monitoring Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Guava Orchards in Maputo, Mozambique”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–120
e2

“Torula and palm sap were the best attractants, with no significant difference between them”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–847

Title

Evaluation of Local Food Baits for Monitoring Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Guava Orchards in Maputo, Mozambique

Deborah Apio; Laura Canhanga; Domingos Cugala Insects 2026. doi:10.3390/insects17060555

Other claims from this paper (6)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RAPD screening with seven primers revealed no significant genetic variation between tissue-culture plantlets and mother plants.

Taxon
Coffea arabicaCoffea arabicat0
Outcome
genetic variatione5
Comparator
mother plantse5

Verbatim

t0

“in vitro propagated Coffea arabica plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–63
e5

“Screening of the tissue cultured plantlets and mother plants with seven selected RAPD primers revealed no significant genetic variation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–944

Title

Genetic assessment of in vitro propagated Coffea arabica plants using RAPD makers

Natthiya Chaichana; Jiraporn Palee; Somruthai Tunma; et al. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding 2026. doi:10.37992/2026.1701.015

Other claims from this paper (3)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Distribution uniformity did not differ significantly between laboratory and pilot field settings.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticae7
Outcome
distribution uniformitye1
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
two environmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“Statistical analysis confirmed no significant difference between the two environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1366–1451
e1

“high distribution uniformity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1218
e7

“apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–738

Title

Development of a new spot ring fertilizer distribution system for smart nutrition management in orchards

Arkar Minn; Victor Massaki Nakaguchi; Tofael Ahamed Smart Agricultural Technology 2026. doi:10.1016/j.atech.2026.101914

Other claims from this paper (6)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Predicted measurements did not differ significantly from ground truth.

Taxon
mandarint0
Outcome
YOLOv8-predicted measurementse0
Comparator
ground truth datae0

Verbatim

e0

“nonsignificant differences between YOLOv8-predicted measurements and ground truth data”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1307
t0

“mandarin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–53

Title

Deep learning based instance segmentation of mandarin fruit slices for precision assessment and morphological quantification

Anh Tuan Le; Jinhyun Ahn; Thanh Tuan Thai Scientific Reports 2026. doi:10.1038/s41598-026-46784-4

Other claims from this paper (10)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Finger and sled breakers did not differ significantly in silty-clay soil.

Outcome
differencese0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Comparator
rolling-type finger and sled-type designse0

Verbatim

e0

“no significant differences were observed between the rolling-type finger and sled-type designs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1341
t0

“using cotton seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–829

Title

Development and evaluation of various types of manually operated soil crust breakers

Bahadır Candan; Davut Karayel Journal of Agricultural Engineering 2026. doi:10.4081/jae.2026.1827

Other claims from this paper (5)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Breakers did not differ significantly in clay-loam soil.

Outcome
performance differencese0
Direction
not statistically significante0
Comparator
three crust breakerse0
Setting
clay-loam soile0

Verbatim

e0

“In clay-loam soil, performance differences among the three crust breakers were not statistically significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1452
t0

“using cotton seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–829

Title

Development and evaluation of various types of manually operated soil crust breakers

Bahadır Candan; Davut Karayel Journal of Agricultural Engineering 2026. doi:10.4081/jae.2026.1827

Other claims from this paper (5)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.