Claim · model-written summary
Conventional tillage was more favorable for soil density and porosity than minimum and zero tillage.
- Taxon
- BARLEY
.jpg?width=60)
Hordeum vulgaret0 - Outcome
- soil density and increase of general porositye0
- Comparator
- minimum and zero tillagee0
Not reportedDirection
Verbatim
e0“tillage under decrease of soil density and increase of general porosity, especially porosity of autumn aeration is more preferable and advantageous than minimum and zero tillage”
t0“BARLEY”
Title
THE INFLUENCE OF ENERGY SAVING PROCESSING UPON BIOLOGICAL SOIL ACTIVITY IN BARLEY SOWINGS
E. P. Denisov; K. E. Denisov; E. V. Podgornov; et al. DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) 2018
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Intervention effect Reduced tillage with straw increased topsoil humus.
- Intervention effect Reduced tillage with straw decreased topsoil nitrate N.
- Intervention effect Conventional tillage yielded two to three times as many saprophytic microorganisms as minimum or zero tillage.
- Intervention effect Zero tillage decreased ammonifying and nitrifying bacteria.
- Intervention effect Zero tillage increased anaerobic cellulose destroying microorganisms.
- Intervention effect Energy saving tillage lowered barley productivity by 17,7-22,9% against plowing.
- Intervention effect Fertilizing raised barley productivity under plowing by 10,8%.
- Intervention effect Fertilizing raised barley productivity under minimum tillage by 19,6%.
- Intervention effect Fertilizing raised barley productivity under zero tillage by 19,4%.
- Observation Economic evaluation favored energy saving tillage for barley.