View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Correlated errors did not differ across nitrogen conditions.
Outcomecorrelated errors e0 Comparatordifferent N conditions e0 Verbatim
e0 “There was no difference in terms of correlated errors in experiments under different N conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1616–1713 t0 “corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–53 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The ONT-derived BBWV2 RNA2 genome segment was intact with no sequencing errors observed.
Outcomesequencing errors e3 QualifierRNA2 was intact e3 Verbatim
e3 “its RNA2 was intact, and no sequencing errors were observed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–858 t0 “Hybrid RNA sequencing of broad bean wilt virus 2 from faba beans ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–64 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Most birch clones had similar properties, within the limits of statistical errors .
Outcomesimilar properties e6 Qualifierwithin the limits of statistical errors e6 Verbatim
e1 “birch trees grown on a provenance experiment plot established as a seed orchard ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 62–141 e6 “Most of clones had similar properties within the limits of statistical errors ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–886 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Eigenvalues and cross-validation errors did not support a structured oat population.
Outcomestructured population e0 Verbatim
t0 “Oat Germplasm ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–64 e0 “Neither the eigenvalues of the first 25 PCs nor the cross-validation errors from = 1 to 20 model-based analyses suggested a structured population. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–448 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
There were no consistent differences in the magnitudes of the standard errors of the means between inner and guard rows.
Outcomemagnitudes of the standard errors e4 Verbatim
t0 “Comparison of total tuber yields from inner and guard rows used in potato ( Solanum tuberosum L.) fertiliser experiments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–120 e4 “There were no consistent differences in the magnitudes of the standard errors of the means for inner and guard rows ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1186 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Changes due to mineralisation of soil organic matter during the two years were within the errors of the experiment.
Outcomechanges due to mineralisation of the soil organic matter e2 Qualifierwithin the errors of the experiment e2 Verbatim
e1 “The uptake of fertiliser nitrogen (N) by winter wheat was measured ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–75 e2 “Any changes due to mineralisation of the soil organic matter during the 2 years of the experiment were within the errors of the experiment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1314–1452 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) simulated Claim · model-written summary
Embryo-to-seed ratio did not differ significantly between basal taxa and derived groups because the model had large standard errors .
Directionno statistically significant differences e0 Comparatorany derived group e0 Verbatim
e0 “There were no statistically significant differences in E:S between basal taxa and any derived group due to extremely large standard errors produced by GLS models ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1117 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The calibration errors did not reduce validation performance for maize at Castro.
Outcomeperformance in the validation process e3 Directionnot enough to reduce e3 Verbatim
e0 “The aim of this study was to calibrate and validate the AquaCrop model for maize crop in the edaphoclimatic conditions of Campos Gerais region, Paraná State, Brazil ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 198–362 e3 “However, the errors were not enough to reduce the performance in the validation process for this localitie ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1305–1411 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) simulated Claim · model-written summary
Embryo-to-seed ratios did not differ significantly between basal taxa and derived groups in GLS reconstructions.
Directionno statistically significant differences e0 Qualifierextremely large standard errors e0 Comparatorbasal taxa and any derived group e0 Verbatim
e0 “There were no statistically significant differences in E:S between basal taxa and any derived group due to extremely large standard errors produced by GLS models. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1118 t0 “SEED PLANTS ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–65 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The value of k was the same for samples taken before planting and after lifting of the potatoes in the same field.
Verbatim
e0 “The value of k was the same for samples taken before planting and, in the same field after lifting of the potatoes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1281 Other claims from this paper (5) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.