Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“decrease in dry weight”

2 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

plus 2 non-evaluative

Over time

2000 ’10 ’20

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

Taxon: alfalfa ✕

Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf share fell from 87-94% to 26-31% during first-mowing maturation.

Taxon: alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Outcome: proportion of leavese0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 87-94% to 26-31%e0

Verbatim

e0
“a decrease in the proportion of leaves in the grass from 87-94% to 26-31% in dry weight”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1450

e1
“alfalfa-cereal agrophytocenoses”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 71–102

Title

Chemical composition of feed of luceral-cereal agrophytocenoses depending on technological elements of growing

V. Kurhak; Y. Havrysh Feeds and Feed Production 2022. doi:10.31073/10.31073/kormovyrobnytstvo202293-08

Other claims from this paper (10)

Association Alfalfa stands raised crude protein content by 5.4-7.0% versus grass stands.
Association Alfalfa stands raised feed-unit nutritional value by 14-21%.
Association Alfalfa stands raised metabolic energy by 0.6-1.3 MJ/kg.
Association Alfalfa stands raised dry matter digestibility by 2-5%.
Association Alfalfa stands lowered nitrogen-free extractives by 1.6-4.5%.
Association Crude protein fell from 24.1- 25.5 to 11.7-16.1% with aging.
Association Crude fiber rose from 16.1- 19.2% to 29.0-33,1% with aging.
Association Grassland crude protein declined 0.25% daily, faster than alfalfa stands.
Association Grassland crude fiber increased 0.28% daily, faster than alfalfa stands.
Observation Alfalfa and alfalfa-cereal stands showed respective daily changes of 0.19 and 0.24%.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 042BM noeA sequence was 99% identical to the S. meliloti 1021 sequence.

Taxon: alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Gene: noeAt0
Outcome: identicale0
Value: 99%e0

Verbatim

e0
“It is identical to that of S. meliloti 1021 at 99% level, and similarity of their NoeA is 97%.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 32–126

t0
“noeA from Sinorhizobium meliloti 042BM”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–84

e1
“Compared to 042BM, the noeA deletion mutant 042BMA-Km showed different degrees of increase in number of nodule, fresh weight of nodule and plant top dry weight on alfalfa cultivars of Putong Zihua, Baoding, Ningxia, Baifa and Aohan, but decrease on Milu.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–655

Title

[Cloning, deletion and functional analysis of noeA from Sinorhizobium meliloti 042BM].

Bing-hai Du; Ju-quan Jiang; Xiao-hong Li; et al. PubMed 2005

Other claims from this paper (9)

Observation NoeA similarity between 042BM and S. meliloti 1021 was 97%.
Observation NoeA shared 32% similarity with a Mesorhizobium methyltransferase.
Observation NoeA residues 303-362 had 41% similarity to an E. coli methyltransferase region.
Intervention effect The noeA deletion mutant increased nodule number in five alfalfa cultivars.
Intervention effect The noeA deletion mutant increased nodule fresh weight in five alfalfa cultivars.
Intervention effect The noeA deletion mutant increased plant top dry weight in five alfalfa cultivars.
Intervention effect The noeA deletion mutant decreased the three measured traits on Milu alfalfa.
Intervention effect The mutant showed no significant change in nodulation of Huanghou and Zahua.
Mechanism The authors conclude that noeA contributes to cultivar-specific alfalfa nodulation.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“decrease in dry weight”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics