View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Recommendation author interpretation original result positive basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Application to regrowths with slow growth or high legume content should be avoided to maximize slurry N recovery .
Outcomeapplication to regrowths with potentially slow rates of growth or high legume content should be avoided e5 QualifierTo maximize slurry N recovery e5 Verbatim
t0 “forage type ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–55 e5 “To maximize slurry N recovery , application to regrowths with potentially slow rates of growth or high legume content should be avoided ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1274 Other claims from this paper (5) Recommendation author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend two split applications of moderate fertilizer rates for cassava.
Outcometwo split applications of moderate rates of fertilizer e0 Verbatim
e0 “The importance of two split applications of moderate rates of fertilizer to cassava is presented ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–893 Other claims from this paper (6) Recommendation author interpretation original result positive basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Four fertilizer applications at the tested rates were adequate for the coffee crop stages.
Outcomesplitting into four applications of the used fertilizer rates e0 Verbatim
t0 “coffee plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–68 e0 “The splitting into four applications of the used fertilizer rates was adequate for the requirements of the crop at these growth stages of the coffee crop ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1351 Other claims from this paper (6) Recommendation author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Slow woodrose growth should inform sustainable harvest limits.
Outcomesustainable harvesting limits e0 Verbatim
e0 “These slow rates of growth must be taken into consideration when determining sustainable harvesting limits ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1770–1876 t0 “Erianthemum dregei (Loranthaceae) on Sclerocarya birrea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–149 Other claims from this paper (8) Recommendation author interpretation original result positive basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend lighter slurry rates for timothy.
Outcomelighter rates (supplying 132 and 134 kg N/ha) e0 Verbatim
e0 “The lighter rates (supplying 132 and 134 kg N/ha) had the advantage of less physical suppression of growth during the first cut following application and is, therefore, recommended. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–740 t0 “timothy ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–28 Other claims from this paper (9) Recommendation author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
A better criterion than CEC is needed for determining acceptable metal loading rates on major southeastern US soils.
Outcomea better criterion than CEC is needed e0 Verbatim
t0 “Fescuegrass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–133 e0 “it appears that a better criterion than CEC is needed for determining acceptable metal loading rates for major soils of the southeastern United States ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2031–2181 Other claims from this paper (17) Recommendation author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The optimal nitrogen rates under the four temperature treatments ranged from 1.3 to 2.6 g per plant.
Outcomeoptimal nitrogen application rates e0 Value2.6, 2.6, 1.95 and 1.3 g/plant e0 Verbatim
e0 “the optimal nitrogen application rates under CKT-SHT treatment were 2.6, 2.6, 1.95 and 1.3 g/plant, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2142–2254 t0 “Tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–127 Other claims from this paper (13) Recommendation author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The optimal nitrogen rate under CKT was 2.6 g per plant.
TreatmentCKT-SHT treatment e0 Outcomeoptimal nitrogen application rates e0 Verbatim
e0 “the optimal nitrogen application rates under CKT-SHT treatment were 2.6, 2.6, 1.95 and 1.3 g/plant, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2142–2254 t0 “Tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–127 Other claims from this paper (13) Recommendation author interpretation original result positive basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors suggest 30 kg N ha−1 can sustain reproductive growth in derived Savanna rice with higher nitrogen efficiencies.
Treatmentapplication of 30 kg N ha−1 e0 Outcomesustain the reproductive growth e0 Verbatim
e0 “These evidences suggested that application of 30 kg N ha−1 could sustain the reproductive growth of lowland rice because of prolonged phenology and N uptake in a derived Savanna with higher efficiency (PFPN, Agronomic efficiency N and Recovery efficiency N) despite the similarities in their root growth and activities. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1561 Other claims from this paper (9) Recommendation author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors conclude that seed dressing plus foliar phosphorus may be a better alternative to soil application.
Outcomea combination of seed dressing and foliar applications of P e0 Qualifierpotentially a better alternative e0 Comparatorconventional soil-based application e0 Verbatim
e0 “We conclude that a combination of seed dressing and foliar applications of P is potentially a better alternative to conventional soil-based application, of fering greater efficiency in use of applied P both in terms of P-uptake rate and grain yield. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1367 e1 “spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–618 Other claims from this paper (3) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.