View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper organism_group: Green plants ✕ organism_family: Malvaceae ✕ Organism: Gossypium hirsutum ✕
Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The agent increased cotton seedling chlorophyll content by 6.6% in pot experiments.
TreatmentBacillus compound agent t1 Outcomechlorophyll content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “chlorophyll content increased by 6.6% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–315 t0 “cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 t1 “Bacillus compound agent ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–35 Other claims from this paper (18) Intervention effect The agent enhanced cotton seedling root activity by 87.69% in pot experiments. Intervention effect The agent decreased malondialdehyde (MDA) content of cotton seedlings by 44.36%. Intervention effect The agent treatment increased catalase (CAT) activity in cotton seedlings by 136.56%. Intervention effect The agent treatment increased peroxidase (POD) activity in cotton seedlings by 125.00%. Intervention effect The agent treatment increased superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity in cotton seedlings by 45.73%. Intervention effect In field plot trials the agent increased cotton yield by 20.00%-24.34%. Intervention effect The agent improved cotton fiber quality in field plots: spinning consistency index, breaking fiber strength and elongation increased by 7.35%, 7.48% and 3.06%, respectively. Intervention effect Compared with the control group, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium contents in cotton leaves increased by 33.27%, 68.24% and 37.76%, respectively. Intervention effect Compared with the control group, cotton rhizosphere soil pH decreased by 2.78%. Intervention effect Compared with the control group, rhizosphere soil available phosphorus, organic matter and total phosphorus increased by 33.43%, 17.40% and 73.26%, respectively. Intervention effect Compared with the control group, the bacterial community Chao1 index decreased by 7.93%. Intervention effect Compared with the control group, the bacterial community Shannon index increased by 0.29%. Intervention effect Compared with the control group, fungal community Chao1 and Shannon indices increased by 17.54% and 1.07%, respectively. Intervention effect At the genus level the relative abundances of Iamia, Polycyclovorans, Arenimonas and Verticillium increased by 43.48%, 10.51%, 31.27% and 67.58%, respectively. Intervention effect The relative abundances of Bacillus and Fusarium decreased by 35.37% and 21.00%, respectively. Intervention effect Terpenoid and nitrogen-containing compound contents in cotton rhizosphere soil increased. Intervention effect Phenol content in cotton rhizosphere soil decreased. Intervention effect Tryptamine, L-tryptophan and serotonin accumulated significantly in the rhizosphere soil. Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The agent enhanced cotton seedling root activity by 87.69% in pot experiments.
TreatmentBacillus compound agent t1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “root activity was enhanced by 87.69% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–353 t0 “cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 t1 “Bacillus compound agent ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–35 Other claims from this paper (18) Intervention effect The agent increased cotton seedling chlorophyll content by 6.6% in pot experiments. Intervention effect The agent decreased malondialdehyde (MDA) content of cotton seedlings by 44.36%. Intervention effect The agent treatment increased catalase (CAT) activity in cotton seedlings by 136.56%. Intervention effect The agent treatment increased peroxidase (POD) activity in cotton seedlings by 125.00%. Intervention effect The agent treatment increased superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity in cotton seedlings by 45.73%. Intervention effect In field plot trials the agent increased cotton yield by 20.00%-24.34%. Intervention effect The agent improved cotton fiber quality in field plots: spinning consistency index, breaking fiber strength and elongation increased by 7.35%, 7.48% and 3.06%, respectively. Intervention effect Compared with the control group, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium contents in cotton leaves increased by 33.27%, 68.24% and 37.76%, respectively. Intervention effect Compared with the control group, cotton rhizosphere soil pH decreased by 2.78%. Intervention effect Compared with the control group, rhizosphere soil available phosphorus, organic matter and total phosphorus increased by 33.43%, 17.40% and 73.26%, respectively. Intervention effect Compared with the control group, the bacterial community Chao1 index decreased by 7.93%. Intervention effect Compared with the control group, the bacterial community Shannon index increased by 0.29%. Intervention effect Compared with the control group, fungal community Chao1 and Shannon indices increased by 17.54% and 1.07%, respectively. Intervention effect At the genus level the relative abundances of Iamia, Polycyclovorans, Arenimonas and Verticillium increased by 43.48%, 10.51%, 31.27% and 67.58%, respectively. Intervention effect The relative abundances of Bacillus and Fusarium decreased by 35.37% and 21.00%, respectively. Intervention effect Terpenoid and nitrogen-containing compound contents in cotton rhizosphere soil increased. Intervention effect Phenol content in cotton rhizosphere soil decreased. Intervention effect Tryptamine, L-tryptophan and serotonin accumulated significantly in the rhizosphere soil. Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The agent decreased malondialdehyde (MDA) content of cotton seedlings by 44.36%.
TreatmentBacillus compound agent t1 Outcomemalondialdehyde (MDA) content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “malondialdehyde (MDA) content decreased by 44.36% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–408 t0 “cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 t1 “Bacillus compound agent ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–35 Other claims from this paper (18) Intervention effect The agent increased cotton seedling chlorophyll content by 6.6% in pot experiments. Intervention effect The agent enhanced cotton seedling root activity by 87.69% in pot experiments. Intervention effect The agent treatment increased catalase (CAT) activity in cotton seedlings by 136.56%. Intervention effect The agent treatment increased peroxidase (POD) activity in cotton seedlings by 125.00%. Intervention effect The agent treatment increased superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity in cotton seedlings by 45.73%. Intervention effect In field plot trials the agent increased cotton yield by 20.00%-24.34%. Intervention effect The agent improved cotton fiber quality in field plots: spinning consistency index, breaking fiber strength and elongation increased by 7.35%, 7.48% and 3.06%, respectively. Intervention effect Compared with the control group, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium contents in cotton leaves increased by 33.27%, 68.24% and 37.76%, respectively. Intervention effect Compared with the control group, cotton rhizosphere soil pH decreased by 2.78%. Intervention effect Compared with the control group, rhizosphere soil available phosphorus, organic matter and total phosphorus increased by 33.43%, 17.40% and 73.26%, respectively. Intervention effect Compared with the control group, the bacterial community Chao1 index decreased by 7.93%. Intervention effect Compared with the control group, the bacterial community Shannon index increased by 0.29%. Intervention effect Compared with the control group, fungal community Chao1 and Shannon indices increased by 17.54% and 1.07%, respectively. Intervention effect At the genus level the relative abundances of Iamia, Polycyclovorans, Arenimonas and Verticillium increased by 43.48%, 10.51%, 31.27% and 67.58%, respectively. Intervention effect The relative abundances of Bacillus and Fusarium decreased by 35.37% and 21.00%, respectively. Intervention effect Terpenoid and nitrogen-containing compound contents in cotton rhizosphere soil increased. Intervention effect Phenol content in cotton rhizosphere soil decreased. Intervention effect Tryptamine, L-tryptophan and serotonin accumulated significantly in the rhizosphere soil. Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The agent treatment increased catalase (CAT) activity in cotton seedlings by 136.56%.
Treatmentthe agent treatment e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the agent treatment significantly enhanced the antioxidant enzyme activities in cotton seedlings, with catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POD), and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activities increasing by 136.56%, 125.00%, and 45.73%, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–658 Other claims from this paper (18) Intervention effect The agent increased cotton seedling chlorophyll content by 6.6% in pot experiments. Intervention effect The agent enhanced cotton seedling root activity by 87.69% in pot experiments. Intervention effect The agent decreased malondialdehyde (MDA) content of cotton seedlings by 44.36%. Intervention effect The agent treatment increased peroxidase (POD) activity in cotton seedlings by 125.00%. Intervention effect The agent treatment increased superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity in cotton seedlings by 45.73%. Intervention effect In field plot trials the agent increased cotton yield by 20.00%-24.34%. Intervention effect The agent improved cotton fiber quality in field plots: spinning consistency index, breaking fiber strength and elongation increased by 7.35%, 7.48% and 3.06%, respectively. Intervention effect Compared with the control group, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium contents in cotton leaves increased by 33.27%, 68.24% and 37.76%, respectively. Intervention effect Compared with the control group, cotton rhizosphere soil pH decreased by 2.78%. Intervention effect Compared with the control group, rhizosphere soil available phosphorus, organic matter and total phosphorus increased by 33.43%, 17.40% and 73.26%, respectively. Intervention effect Compared with the control group, the bacterial community Chao1 index decreased by 7.93%. Intervention effect Compared with the control group, the bacterial community Shannon index increased by 0.29%. Intervention effect Compared with the control group, fungal community Chao1 and Shannon indices increased by 17.54% and 1.07%, respectively. Intervention effect At the genus level the relative abundances of Iamia, Polycyclovorans, Arenimonas and Verticillium increased by 43.48%, 10.51%, 31.27% and 67.58%, respectively. Intervention effect The relative abundances of Bacillus and Fusarium decreased by 35.37% and 21.00%, respectively. Intervention effect Terpenoid and nitrogen-containing compound contents in cotton rhizosphere soil increased. Intervention effect Phenol content in cotton rhizosphere soil decreased. Intervention effect Tryptamine, L-tryptophan and serotonin accumulated significantly in the rhizosphere soil. Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The agent treatment increased peroxidase (POD) activity in cotton seedlings by 125.00%.
Treatmentthe agent treatment e0 Outcomeperoxidase (POD) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the agent treatment significantly enhanced the antioxidant enzyme activities in cotton seedlings, with catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POD), and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activities increasing by 136.56%, 125.00%, and 45.73%, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–658 Other claims from this paper (18) Intervention effect The agent increased cotton seedling chlorophyll content by 6.6% in pot experiments. Intervention effect The agent enhanced cotton seedling root activity by 87.69% in pot experiments. Intervention effect The agent decreased malondialdehyde (MDA) content of cotton seedlings by 44.36%. Intervention effect The agent treatment increased catalase (CAT) activity in cotton seedlings by 136.56%. Intervention effect The agent treatment increased superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity in cotton seedlings by 45.73%. Intervention effect In field plot trials the agent increased cotton yield by 20.00%-24.34%. Intervention effect The agent improved cotton fiber quality in field plots: spinning consistency index, breaking fiber strength and elongation increased by 7.35%, 7.48% and 3.06%, respectively. Intervention effect Compared with the control group, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium contents in cotton leaves increased by 33.27%, 68.24% and 37.76%, respectively. Intervention effect Compared with the control group, cotton rhizosphere soil pH decreased by 2.78%. Intervention effect Compared with the control group, rhizosphere soil available phosphorus, organic matter and total phosphorus increased by 33.43%, 17.40% and 73.26%, respectively. Intervention effect Compared with the control group, the bacterial community Chao1 index decreased by 7.93%. Intervention effect Compared with the control group, the bacterial community Shannon index increased by 0.29%. Intervention effect Compared with the control group, fungal community Chao1 and Shannon indices increased by 17.54% and 1.07%, respectively. Intervention effect At the genus level the relative abundances of Iamia, Polycyclovorans, Arenimonas and Verticillium increased by 43.48%, 10.51%, 31.27% and 67.58%, respectively. Intervention effect The relative abundances of Bacillus and Fusarium decreased by 35.37% and 21.00%, respectively. Intervention effect Terpenoid and nitrogen-containing compound contents in cotton rhizosphere soil increased. Intervention effect Phenol content in cotton rhizosphere soil decreased. Intervention effect Tryptamine, L-tryptophan and serotonin accumulated significantly in the rhizosphere soil. Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The agent treatment increased superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity in cotton seedlings by 45.73%.
Treatmentthe agent treatment e0 Outcomesuperoxide dismutase (SOD) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the agent treatment significantly enhanced the antioxidant enzyme activities in cotton seedlings, with catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POD), and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activities increasing by 136.56%, 125.00%, and 45.73%, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–658 Other claims from this paper (18) Intervention effect The agent increased cotton seedling chlorophyll content by 6.6% in pot experiments. Intervention effect The agent enhanced cotton seedling root activity by 87.69% in pot experiments. Intervention effect The agent decreased malondialdehyde (MDA) content of cotton seedlings by 44.36%. Intervention effect The agent treatment increased catalase (CAT) activity in cotton seedlings by 136.56%. Intervention effect The agent treatment increased peroxidase (POD) activity in cotton seedlings by 125.00%. Intervention effect In field plot trials the agent increased cotton yield by 20.00%-24.34%. Intervention effect The agent improved cotton fiber quality in field plots: spinning consistency index, breaking fiber strength and elongation increased by 7.35%, 7.48% and 3.06%, respectively. Intervention effect Compared with the control group, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium contents in cotton leaves increased by 33.27%, 68.24% and 37.76%, respectively. Intervention effect Compared with the control group, cotton rhizosphere soil pH decreased by 2.78%. Intervention effect Compared with the control group, rhizosphere soil available phosphorus, organic matter and total phosphorus increased by 33.43%, 17.40% and 73.26%, respectively. Intervention effect Compared with the control group, the bacterial community Chao1 index decreased by 7.93%. Intervention effect Compared with the control group, the bacterial community Shannon index increased by 0.29%. Intervention effect Compared with the control group, fungal community Chao1 and Shannon indices increased by 17.54% and 1.07%, respectively. Intervention effect At the genus level the relative abundances of Iamia, Polycyclovorans, Arenimonas and Verticillium increased by 43.48%, 10.51%, 31.27% and 67.58%, respectively. Intervention effect The relative abundances of Bacillus and Fusarium decreased by 35.37% and 21.00%, respectively. Intervention effect Terpenoid and nitrogen-containing compound contents in cotton rhizosphere soil increased. Intervention effect Phenol content in cotton rhizosphere soil decreased. Intervention effect Tryptamine, L-tryptophan and serotonin accumulated significantly in the rhizosphere soil. Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
In field plot trials the agent increased cotton yield by 20.00%-24.34%.
SettingField plot trials e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Field plot trials showed that the agent increased cotton yield by 20.00%–24.34% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–739 Other claims from this paper (18) Intervention effect The agent increased cotton seedling chlorophyll content by 6.6% in pot experiments. Intervention effect The agent enhanced cotton seedling root activity by 87.69% in pot experiments. Intervention effect The agent decreased malondialdehyde (MDA) content of cotton seedlings by 44.36%. Intervention effect The agent treatment increased catalase (CAT) activity in cotton seedlings by 136.56%. Intervention effect The agent treatment increased peroxidase (POD) activity in cotton seedlings by 125.00%. Intervention effect The agent treatment increased superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity in cotton seedlings by 45.73%. Intervention effect The agent improved cotton fiber quality in field plots: spinning consistency index, breaking fiber strength and elongation increased by 7.35%, 7.48% and 3.06%, respectively. Intervention effect Compared with the control group, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium contents in cotton leaves increased by 33.27%, 68.24% and 37.76%, respectively. Intervention effect Compared with the control group, cotton rhizosphere soil pH decreased by 2.78%. Intervention effect Compared with the control group, rhizosphere soil available phosphorus, organic matter and total phosphorus increased by 33.43%, 17.40% and 73.26%, respectively. Intervention effect Compared with the control group, the bacterial community Chao1 index decreased by 7.93%. Intervention effect Compared with the control group, the bacterial community Shannon index increased by 0.29%. Intervention effect Compared with the control group, fungal community Chao1 and Shannon indices increased by 17.54% and 1.07%, respectively. Intervention effect At the genus level the relative abundances of Iamia, Polycyclovorans, Arenimonas and Verticillium increased by 43.48%, 10.51%, 31.27% and 67.58%, respectively. Intervention effect The relative abundances of Bacillus and Fusarium decreased by 35.37% and 21.00%, respectively. Intervention effect Terpenoid and nitrogen-containing compound contents in cotton rhizosphere soil increased. Intervention effect Phenol content in cotton rhizosphere soil decreased. Intervention effect Tryptamine, L-tryptophan and serotonin accumulated significantly in the rhizosphere soil. Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The agent improved cotton fiber quality in field plots: spinning consistency index, breaking fiber strength and elongation increased by 7.35%, 7.48% and 3.06%, respectively.
Outcomespinning consistency index, breaking fiber strength, and elongation e0 Value7.35%, 7.48%, and 3.06% e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the agent increased cotton yield by 20.00%–24.34% and improved fiber quality, with the spinning consistency index, breaking fiber strength, and elongation increased by 7.35%, 7.48%, and 3.06%, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–895 Other claims from this paper (18) Intervention effect The agent increased cotton seedling chlorophyll content by 6.6% in pot experiments. Intervention effect The agent enhanced cotton seedling root activity by 87.69% in pot experiments. Intervention effect The agent decreased malondialdehyde (MDA) content of cotton seedlings by 44.36%. Intervention effect The agent treatment increased catalase (CAT) activity in cotton seedlings by 136.56%. Intervention effect The agent treatment increased peroxidase (POD) activity in cotton seedlings by 125.00%. Intervention effect The agent treatment increased superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity in cotton seedlings by 45.73%. Intervention effect In field plot trials the agent increased cotton yield by 20.00%-24.34%. Intervention effect Compared with the control group, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium contents in cotton leaves increased by 33.27%, 68.24% and 37.76%, respectively. Intervention effect Compared with the control group, cotton rhizosphere soil pH decreased by 2.78%. Intervention effect Compared with the control group, rhizosphere soil available phosphorus, organic matter and total phosphorus increased by 33.43%, 17.40% and 73.26%, respectively. Intervention effect Compared with the control group, the bacterial community Chao1 index decreased by 7.93%. Intervention effect Compared with the control group, the bacterial community Shannon index increased by 0.29%. Intervention effect Compared with the control group, fungal community Chao1 and Shannon indices increased by 17.54% and 1.07%, respectively. Intervention effect At the genus level the relative abundances of Iamia, Polycyclovorans, Arenimonas and Verticillium increased by 43.48%, 10.51%, 31.27% and 67.58%, respectively. Intervention effect The relative abundances of Bacillus and Fusarium decreased by 35.37% and 21.00%, respectively. Intervention effect Terpenoid and nitrogen-containing compound contents in cotton rhizosphere soil increased. Intervention effect Phenol content in cotton rhizosphere soil decreased. Intervention effect Tryptamine, L-tryptophan and serotonin accumulated significantly in the rhizosphere soil. Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Compared with the control group, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium contents in cotton leaves increased by 33.27%, 68.24% and 37.76%, respectively.
Organ / stagecotton leaves e0 TreatmentBacillus compound agent t1 Outcomenitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) contents e0 Value33.27%, 68.24%, and 37.76% e0 Comparatorthe control group e0 Verbatim
e0 “compared with the control group: nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) contents in cotton leaves increased by 33.27%, 68.24%, and 37.76%, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1222 t1 “Bacillus compound agent ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–35 Other claims from this paper (18) Intervention effect The agent increased cotton seedling chlorophyll content by 6.6% in pot experiments. Intervention effect The agent enhanced cotton seedling root activity by 87.69% in pot experiments. Intervention effect The agent decreased malondialdehyde (MDA) content of cotton seedlings by 44.36%. Intervention effect The agent treatment increased catalase (CAT) activity in cotton seedlings by 136.56%. Intervention effect The agent treatment increased peroxidase (POD) activity in cotton seedlings by 125.00%. Intervention effect The agent treatment increased superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity in cotton seedlings by 45.73%. Intervention effect In field plot trials the agent increased cotton yield by 20.00%-24.34%. Intervention effect The agent improved cotton fiber quality in field plots: spinning consistency index, breaking fiber strength and elongation increased by 7.35%, 7.48% and 3.06%, respectively. Intervention effect Compared with the control group, cotton rhizosphere soil pH decreased by 2.78%. Intervention effect Compared with the control group, rhizosphere soil available phosphorus, organic matter and total phosphorus increased by 33.43%, 17.40% and 73.26%, respectively. Intervention effect Compared with the control group, the bacterial community Chao1 index decreased by 7.93%. Intervention effect Compared with the control group, the bacterial community Shannon index increased by 0.29%. Intervention effect Compared with the control group, fungal community Chao1 and Shannon indices increased by 17.54% and 1.07%, respectively. Intervention effect At the genus level the relative abundances of Iamia, Polycyclovorans, Arenimonas and Verticillium increased by 43.48%, 10.51%, 31.27% and 67.58%, respectively. Intervention effect The relative abundances of Bacillus and Fusarium decreased by 35.37% and 21.00%, respectively. Intervention effect Terpenoid and nitrogen-containing compound contents in cotton rhizosphere soil increased. Intervention effect Phenol content in cotton rhizosphere soil decreased. Intervention effect Tryptamine, L-tryptophan and serotonin accumulated significantly in the rhizosphere soil. Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Compared with the control group, cotton rhizosphere soil pH decreased by 2.78%.
TreatmentBacillus compound agent t1 Outcomerhizosphere soil pH e0 Comparatorthe control group e1 Verbatim
e0 “rhizosphere soil pH decreased by 2.78% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1262 e1 “compared with the control group ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1093 t0 “cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 t1 “Bacillus compound agent ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–35 Other claims from this paper (18) Intervention effect The agent increased cotton seedling chlorophyll content by 6.6% in pot experiments. Intervention effect The agent enhanced cotton seedling root activity by 87.69% in pot experiments. Intervention effect The agent decreased malondialdehyde (MDA) content of cotton seedlings by 44.36%. Intervention effect The agent treatment increased catalase (CAT) activity in cotton seedlings by 136.56%. Intervention effect The agent treatment increased peroxidase (POD) activity in cotton seedlings by 125.00%. Intervention effect The agent treatment increased superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity in cotton seedlings by 45.73%. Intervention effect In field plot trials the agent increased cotton yield by 20.00%-24.34%. Intervention effect The agent improved cotton fiber quality in field plots: spinning consistency index, breaking fiber strength and elongation increased by 7.35%, 7.48% and 3.06%, respectively. Intervention effect Compared with the control group, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium contents in cotton leaves increased by 33.27%, 68.24% and 37.76%, respectively. Intervention effect Compared with the control group, rhizosphere soil available phosphorus, organic matter and total phosphorus increased by 33.43%, 17.40% and 73.26%, respectively. Intervention effect Compared with the control group, the bacterial community Chao1 index decreased by 7.93%. Intervention effect Compared with the control group, the bacterial community Shannon index increased by 0.29%. Intervention effect Compared with the control group, fungal community Chao1 and Shannon indices increased by 17.54% and 1.07%, respectively. Intervention effect At the genus level the relative abundances of Iamia, Polycyclovorans, Arenimonas and Verticillium increased by 43.48%, 10.51%, 31.27% and 67.58%, respectively. Intervention effect The relative abundances of Bacillus and Fusarium decreased by 35.37% and 21.00%, respectively. Intervention effect Terpenoid and nitrogen-containing compound contents in cotton rhizosphere soil increased. Intervention effect Phenol content in cotton rhizosphere soil decreased. Intervention effect Tryptamine, L-tryptophan and serotonin accumulated significantly in the rhizosphere soil. Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.