View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Glycine max ✕
Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The magnitude of the nutrient-concentration decrease varied with crop species and nutrients.
magnitude of decrease e1 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e1 “the magnitude of decrease varied with the crop species and nutrients ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1073 t0 “Upland Rice, Common Bean, Corn, and Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–97 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed review summary significant (as stated) basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The magnitude of the yield decrease and WUE increase under deficit irrigation depended on the stage at which stress was imposed
significantly influenced by the stage at which the stress was imposed e6 Verbatim
t0 “deficit irrigation in soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–53 e6 “with a magnitude significantly influenced by the stage at which the stress was imposed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1243 Other claims from this paper (5) Mechanism author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in conductance-response magnitude with VPD is concluded to be due to an earlier onset of stomatal closure that terminated the pulse response.
magnitude of the integrated conductance response e2 an earlier onset of stomatal closure that terminated the pulse response e2 Verbatim
e1 “The effect of leaf-air vapor pressure difference (VPD) on the magnitude of the stomatal response to blue light was investigated in soybean (Glycine max ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–152 e2 “At 20 degrees C and 25 degrees C, the magnitude of the integrated conductance response decrease d with increasing VPD (0.4 to 2.6 kiloPascals), due to an earlier onset of stomatal closure that terminated the pulse response ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 291–512 Other claims from this paper (6) Recommendation author interpretation original result positive basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors infer that managing the identified factors could decrease the soybean yield gap.
decrease the yield gap e0 Verbatim
e0 “managing magnitude of these variables will decrease the yield gap in soybean crop ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–932 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The diurnal decrease in canopy stomatal conductance of wheat and soybean was smaller with increasing ambient CO2.
increasing ambient CO2 concentrations e2 diurnal decrease e2 Verbatim
e2 “The magnitude of this diurnal decrease in the canopy stomata! conductance of wheat and soybean decrease d with increasing ambient CO2 concentrations ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–996 Other claims from this paper (2) Association author interpretation original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The authors state that the yield and biomass increases under elevated CO2 are consistent with SoyFACE studies but larger in magnitude .
yield and biomass e1 larger effects e1 SoyFACE studies e1 Verbatim
e0 “Elevation of [CO2] will invariably influence soybean growth and yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 105–174 e1 “Our main conclusion is consistent with the results of SoyFACE studies,such as the increase in yield and biomass and the decrease in harvest index with elevated [CO2],but with larger effects than those found in the SoyFACE studies ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1632–1861 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect Elevated CO2 under FACE increased the weight of leaf, stem and pod compared with ambient CO2. Intervention effect Under FACE, above-ground biomass of two varieties was significantly increased by about 52.30% compared with ambient air. Intervention effect Elevated CO2 increased leaf area of Zhonghuang35. Intervention effect Elevated CO2 decreased leaf area of Zhonghuang13. Intervention effect Under FACE, specific leaf weight of two soybean cultivars increased at the filling pod stage. Intervention effect Under FACE, specific leaf weight of Zhonghuang35 was significantly increased by 23.08%. Intervention effect Under FACE, plant node number and branch number increased. Intervention effect Under elevated CO2, stem diameter of Zhonghuang35 significantly increased by 7.18% at harvest. Intervention effect Under elevated CO2, stem diameter of Zhonghuang13 significantly increased by 26.33% at harvest. Intervention effect Under FACE, pod number per plant and individual seed mass increased, which the paper links to higher yield. Intervention effect Under FACE, average soybean yield increased by 30.93%. Intervention effect Elevated CO2 did not significantly affect the average harvest index of soybean. Intervention effect Elevated CO2 did not significantly change the proportional allocation of leaf, stem and pod biomass to above-ground biomass over the growing season. Observation The effect of FACE on soybean differed significantly between the two cultivars. Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Glycine max
Phaseolus vulgaris
Oryza sativa
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
Triticum aestivum