View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Triticum aestivum ✕
Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The magnitude of the decrease caused by waterlogging after booting stage became larger as the wheat plant developed.
TreatmentAfter booting stage, waterlogging e3 Outcomemagnitude of the decrease e3 Qualifierwith the progress of the growth and development of the wheat plant e3 Verbatim
t0 “the Root System of Winter Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–95 e3 “After booting stage, waterlogging would invariably cause pronounced decrease of these characters, and the magnitude of the decrease became larger with the progress of the growth and development of the wheat plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–770 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Scab infestation comparably decrease d kernel mass and volume.
Directionrelative decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “comparable magnitude of relative decrease (due to infestation) of two features (mass and volume) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–468 t0 “winter wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–64 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
After booting stage, waterlogging caused a pronounced decrease of these characters in winter wheat.
TreatmentAfter booting stage, waterlogging e3 Outcomethese characters e3 Directionpronounced decrease e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “the Root System of Winter Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–95 e3 “After booting stage, waterlogging would invariably cause pronounced decrease of these characters, and the magnitude of the decrease became larger with the progress of the growth and development of the wheat plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–770 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Wheat potassium content decrease d by 2.0 at 20 mg/kg sulphur.
Outcomepotassium content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The magnitude of decrease in potassium content was 2.0, 6.1 and 8.2 at 20, 40 and 60 mg/kg sulphur. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1531–1630 t0 “wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–76 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Wheat potassium content decrease d by 6.1 at 40 mg/kg sulphur.
Outcomepotassium content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The magnitude of decrease in potassium content was 2.0, 6.1 and 8.2 at 20, 40 and 60 mg/kg sulphur. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1531–1630 t0 “wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–76 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf chlorophyll declined across drought, heat and combined stress, with increasing severity.
Treatmentdrought<high temperature<combined stress e0 Outcomeleaf chlorophyll e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a decrease in leaf chlorophyll, individual grain weight and grain yield in an increasing magnitude of drought<high temperature<combined stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–1032 e1 “wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–122 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield declined across drought, heat and combined stress, with increasing severity.
Treatmentdrought<high temperature<combined stress e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a decrease in leaf chlorophyll, individual grain weight and grain yield in an increasing magnitude of drought<high temperature<combined stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–1032 e1 “wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–122 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Wheat potassium content decrease d by 8.2 at 60 mg/kg sulphur.
Treatment60 mg/kg sulphur e0 Outcomepotassium content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The magnitude of decrease in potassium content was 2.0, 6.1 and 8.2 at 20, 40 and 60 mg/kg sulphur. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1531–1630 t0 “wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–76 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Individual grain weight declined across drought, heat and combined stress, with increasing severity.
Treatmentdrought<high temperature<combined stress e0 Outcomeindividual grain weight e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a decrease in leaf chlorophyll, individual grain weight and grain yield in an increasing magnitude of drought<high temperature<combined stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–1032 e1 “wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–122 Other claims from this paper (12) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Most wheat yield and yield components decrease d with decreasing irrigation schedules.
Treatmentdecreasing irrigation schedules e0 Outcomeyield and yield component characters e0 Verbatim
e0 “a gradual decrease in most of the yield and yield component characters were in line with decreasing irrigation schedules ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–844 t0 “wheat genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–71 Other claims from this paper (4) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.