View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Zea mays ✕ paper W1996912701 ✕
Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
High humidity did not decrease maize fresh or dry weight .
Treatment>95% relative humidity e1 Outcomegrowth (fresh weight and dry weight) e0 Directionneither a decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “there was neither a decrease in growth (fresh weight and dry weight ) nor in ash content of the ‘humid’plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–487 e1 “Maize plants were grown with nutrients supplied at adequate levels in hydroculture or in soil at 50–60% and at >95% relative humidity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–277 e2 “there was neither a decrease in growth (fresh weight and dry weight ) nor in ash content of the ‘humid’plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–487 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
High humidity did not decrease maize ash content.
Treatment>95% relative humidity e1 Directionneither a decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “there was neither a decrease in growth (fresh weight and dry weight ) nor in ash content of the ‘humid’plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–487 e1 “Maize plants were grown with nutrients supplied at adequate levels in hydroculture or in soil at 50–60% and at >95% relative humidity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–277 e2 “there was neither a decrease in growth (fresh weight and dry weight ) nor in ash content of the ‘humid’plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–487 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The upper shoot also showed no decrease in growth or ash content under high humidity.
Organ / stageupper part of the shoot e0 Treatment>95% relative humidity e1 Outcomeupper part of the shoot e0 Directionneither a decrease e2 Verbatim
e0 “This was also found when the upper part of the shoot (70–150 cm) was tested separately ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–575 e1 “Maize plants were grown with nutrients supplied at adequate levels in hydroculture or in soil at 50–60% and at >95% relative humidity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–277 e2 “there was neither a decrease in growth (fresh weight and dry weight ) nor in ash content of the ‘humid’plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–487 Other claims from this paper (4) Mechanism author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The authors suggest transpiration is not essential for long-distance mineral transport.
Outcomelong‐distance transport of mineral elements e0 Qualifiertranspiration is not essential e0 Verbatim
e0 “It is suggested that transpiration is not essential for long‐distance transport of mineral elements in plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–686 e1 “Maize plants were grown with nutrients supplied at adequate levels in hydroculture or in soil at 50–60% and at >95% relative humidity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–277 e2 “there was neither a decrease in growth (fresh weight and dry weight ) nor in ash content of the ‘humid’plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–487 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Water loss differed by a factor of two to three across humidity conditions.
Treatment>95% relative humidity e1 Outcomeamount of water lost e0 Verbatim
e0 “the amount of water lost by the plants under these conditions differed by a factor 2 to 3 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–377 e1 “Maize plants were grown with nutrients supplied at adequate levels in hydroculture or in soil at 50–60% and at >95% relative humidity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–277 e2 “there was neither a decrease in growth (fresh weight and dry weight ) nor in ash content of the ‘humid’plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–487 Other claims from this paper (4) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.