“decrease in A”

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan treatment of dieffenbachia against Myrothecium gave more than 85% Myrothecium leaf spot response under leaf spraying.

Taxon

dieffenbachiaDieffenbachiae0

Treatment

chitosane0

Interactor

MyrotheciumMyrotheciume0pathogen

Outcome

Myrothecium leaf spote0

Direction

inhibitede0

Value

more than 85%e0

Qualifier

leaf sprayinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Chitosan, (Biochikol 020 PC) a potential elicitor of plant defence and also an active inhibitor of fungal growth was used in experiments. The compound was used at concentrations 0.01 to 0.2% as a plant spray for rose protection against Sphaerotheca pannosa var. rosae, Peronospora sparsa and Diplocarpon rosae, Oidium chrysanthemi and Puccinia horiana on chrysanthemum, against Melampsora epitea on willow. Myrothecium r…” Show full quote

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan treatment of willow against Melampsora epitea gave 10 to 25% uredinia response under 01-0.04%.

Taxon

willowSalixe0

Treatment

chitosane0

Interactor

Melampsora epiteaMelampsora epiteae0pathogen

Outcome

urediniae0

Direction

dried upe0

Value

10 to 25%e0

Qualifier

01-0.04%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Chitosan, (Biochikol 020 PC) a potential elicitor of plant defence and also an active inhibitor of fungal growth was used in experiments. The compound was used at concentrations 0.01 to 0.2% as a plant spray for rose protection against Sphaerotheca pannosa var. rosae, Peronospora sparsa and Diplocarpon rosae, Oidium chrysanthemi and Puccinia horiana on chrysanthemum, against Melampsora epitea on willow. Myrothecium r…” Show full quote

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan treatment of Pinus sylvestris against Lophodermium spp gave below 50% effectiveness of chitosan response under short programme.

Taxon

Pinus sylvestrisPinus sylvestrise0

Treatment

chitosane0

Interactor

Lophodermium sppLophodermiume0pathogen

Outcome

effectiveness of chitosane0

Direction

effectivenesse0

Value

below 50%e0

Qualifier

short programmee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Chitosan, (Biochikol 020 PC) a potential elicitor of plant defence and also an active inhibitor of fungal growth was used in experiments. The compound was used at concentrations 0.01 to 0.2% as a plant spray for rose protection against Sphaerotheca pannosa var. rosae, Peronospora sparsa and Diplocarpon rosae, Oidium chrysanthemi and Puccinia horiana on chrysanthemum, against Melampsora epitea on willow. Myrothecium r…” Show full quote

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan treatment of Pinus sylvestris against Lophodermium spp gave more than 50% effectiveness of chitosan response under long programme.

Taxon

Pinus sylvestrisPinus sylvestrise0

Treatment

chitosane0

Interactor

Lophodermium sppLophodermiume0pathogen

Outcome

effectiveness of chitosane0

Direction

effectivenesse0

Value

more than 50%e0

Qualifier

long programmee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Chitosan, (Biochikol 020 PC) a potential elicitor of plant defence and also an active inhibitor of fungal growth was used in experiments. The compound was used at concentrations 0.01 to 0.2% as a plant spray for rose protection against Sphaerotheca pannosa var. rosae, Peronospora sparsa and Diplocarpon rosae, Oidium chrysanthemi and Puccinia horiana on chrysanthemum, against Melampsora epitea on willow. Myrothecium r…” Show full quote

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan treatment of rose against D. rosae gave 18 to 60% effectiveness of the compound response under 3-week-protection.

Taxon

rosee0

Treatment

chitosane0

Interactor

D. rosaeDiplocarpon rosaee0pathogen

Outcome

effectiveness of the compounde0

Direction

effectivenesse0

Value

18 to 60%e0

Qualifier

3-week-protectione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Chitosan, (Biochikol 020 PC) a potential elicitor of plant defence and also an active inhibitor of fungal growth was used in experiments. The compound was used at concentrations 0.01 to 0.2% as a plant spray for rose protection against Sphaerotheca pannosa var. rosae, Peronospora sparsa and Diplocarpon rosae, Oidium chrysanthemi and Puccinia horiana on chrysanthemum, against Melampsora epitea on willow. Myrothecium r…” Show full quote

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan treatment of chrysanthemum against Puccinia horiana gave 54-97% Effectiveness of chitosan response under 0.01 to 0.05%.

Taxon

chrysanthemumChrysanthemume0

Treatment

chitosane0

Interactor

Puccinia horianaPuccinia horianae0pathogen

Outcome

Effectiveness of chitosane0

Direction

effectivenesse0

Value

54-97%e0

Qualifier

0.01 to 0.05%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Chitosan, (Biochikol 020 PC) a potential elicitor of plant defence and also an active inhibitor of fungal growth was used in experiments. The compound was used at concentrations 0.01 to 0.2% as a plant spray for rose protection against Sphaerotheca pannosa var. rosae, Peronospora sparsa and Diplocarpon rosae, Oidium chrysanthemi and Puccinia horiana on chrysanthemum, against Melampsora epitea on willow. Myrothecium r…” Show full quote

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan treatment of rose against Sphaerotheca pannosa var. rosae gave 43-60% rose powdery mildew symptoms response under 2-week-protection.

Taxon

rosee0

Treatment

chitosane0

Interactor

Sphaerotheca pannosa var. rosaePodosphaera pannosae0pathogen

Outcome

rose powdery mildew symptomse0

Direction

effectivenesse0

Value

43-60%e0

Qualifier

2-week-protectione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Chitosan, (Biochikol 020 PC) a potential elicitor of plant defence and also an active inhibitor of fungal growth was used in experiments. The compound was used at concentrations 0.01 to 0.2% as a plant spray for rose protection against Sphaerotheca pannosa var. rosae, Peronospora sparsa and Diplocarpon rosae, Oidium chrysanthemi and Puccinia horiana on chrysanthemum, against Melampsora epitea on willow. Myrothecium r…” Show full quote

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan treatment of rose against D. rosae gave 16 to 23% effectiveness of tested product response under 9 weeks of protection.

Taxon

rosee0

Treatment

chitosane0

Interactor

D. rosaeDiplocarpon rosaee0pathogen

Outcome

effectiveness of tested producte0

Direction

effectivenesse0

Value

16 to 23%e0

Qualifier

9 weeks of protectione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Chitosan, (Biochikol 020 PC) a potential elicitor of plant defence and also an active inhibitor of fungal growth was used in experiments. The compound was used at concentrations 0.01 to 0.2% as a plant spray for rose protection against Sphaerotheca pannosa var. rosae, Peronospora sparsa and Diplocarpon rosae, Oidium chrysanthemi and Puccinia horiana on chrysanthemum, against Melampsora epitea on willow. Myrothecium r…” Show full quote

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan treatment of chrysanthemum against Oidium chrysanthemi gave 69 to 79% Effectiveness of chitosan response under 0.01 to 0.05%.

Taxon

chrysanthemumChrysanthemume0

Treatment

chitosane0

Interactor

Oidium chrysanthemiGolovinomyces chrysanthemie0pathogen

Outcome

Effectiveness of chitosane0

Direction

effectivenesse0

Value

69 to 79%e0

Qualifier

0.01 to 0.05%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Chitosan, (Biochikol 020 PC) a potential elicitor of plant defence and also an active inhibitor of fungal growth was used in experiments. The compound was used at concentrations 0.01 to 0.2% as a plant spray for rose protection against Sphaerotheca pannosa var. rosae, Peronospora sparsa and Diplocarpon rosae, Oidium chrysanthemi and Puccinia horiana on chrysanthemum, against Melampsora epitea on willow. Myrothecium r…” Show full quote

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 enrichment increased lettuce leaf dry weight gain by 39–75% at moderate PPF.

Taxon

lettuceLactuca sativae0

Organ / stage

leavese0

Treatment

Enrichment of CO2 to 46 mmol m-3 (1000 mm3 dm-3)e0

Outcome

dry weight gaine0

Direction

stimulatede0

Value

39% to 75%e0

Comparator

plants at 16 mmol m-3 CO2 (350 mm3 dm-3)e0

Verbatim

e0

“Enrichment of CO2 to 46 mmol m-3 (1000 mm3 dm-3) at a moderate photosynthetic photon flux (PPF) of 450 micromoles m-2 s-1 stimulated fresh and dry weight gain of lettuce leaves 39% to 75% relative to plants at 16 mmol m-3 CO2 (350 mm3 dm-3).”

e1

“Enrichment of CO2 to 46 mmol m-3 (1000 mm3 dm-3) at a moderate photosynthetic photon flux (PPF) of 450 micromoles m-2 s-1 stimulated fresh and dry weight gain of lettuce leaves 39% to 75% relative to plants at 16 mmol m-3 CO2 (350 mm3 dm-3).”

t0

“Effects of CO2and Photosynthetic Photon Flux on Yield, Gas Exchange and Growth Rate ofLactuca SativaL. ‘Waldmann’s Green”

e2

“Enrichment of CO2 to 46 mmol m-3 (1000 mm3 dm-3) at a moderate photosynthetic photon flux (PPF) of 450 micromoles m-2 s-1 stimulated fresh and dry weight gain of lettuce leaves 39% to 75% relative to plants at 16 mmol m-3 CO2 (350 mm3 dm-3).”

e3

“high PPF of 880-900 micromoles m-2 s-1 gave further, substantial increases in growth, RGR, net assimilation rate (NAR) and photosynthetic rate (Pn), but a decrease in leaf area ratio (LAR), at 46 or 69 mmol m-3 (1000 or 1500 mm3 dm-3) CO2”

e4

“Enrichment of CO2 to a supraoptimal level of 92 mmol m-3 (2000 mm3 dm-3) at high PPF increased leaf area and LAR”