View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Other broad-sense heritability methods differed from these and from one another.
difference with these methods e0 these methods e0 Verbatim
t0 “Cotton Crosses ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–139 e0 “the others methods of BSH had difference with these methods and with from each other ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1565–1649 Other claims from this paper (16) Method / resource observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Range condition methods and study areas differed significantly.
Kabirkooh grasslands t0 significant differences e0 different areas e0 Verbatim
e0 “The results showed that there were significant differences (p<0.01) between both range conditions’ determination methods and different areas ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–831 t0 “Kabirkooh grasslands ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–272 Other claims from this paper (2) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Critical potassium concentrations differed by plant part and estimation method.
plant parts e0 critical concentrations e0 Verbatim
e0 “The critical concentrations varied between plant parts and among the methods used. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1193 e1 “faba bean ( Vicia faba L. cv. Fiord) and chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L. T1587) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 123–200 Other claims from this paper (12) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The best spectral preprocessing method differed by wood property.
near infrared spectra pre-processing methods e0 Verbatim
e0 “The best near infrared spectra pre-processing methods differed by property. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–575 t0 “Tectona grandis wood
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–87 Other claims from this paper (2) Method / resource observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
RF estimation accuracy differed significantly across model inputs, unlike the other four models.
accuracy of model estimation e0 significantly different e0 the other four models e0 Verbatim
e0 “The accuracy of model estimation based on RF is significantly different for different model inputs, while the other four models have small differences. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1409 t0 “Cinnamomum camphora
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–116 Other claims from this paper (5) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The stability parameter and HSC methods differed in their estimates of variety traits.
difference between the both methods e0 single or integrated traits e0 Verbatim
t0 “Sugarcane ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–80 e0 “there was a difference between the both methods that were usually used to estimate single or integrated traits of varieties,respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–349 Other claims from this paper (5) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The methods differed by 7.5 to 18.6 % in 2014.
Verbatim
e0 “The difference ranged from 7.5 to 18.6 % in 2014 and from 20.8 to 45.8 % in 2015. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1552–1633 e1 “Sphagnum species
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1124 Other claims from this paper (9) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The methods differed by 20.8 to 45.8 % in 2015.
Verbatim
e0 “The difference ranged from 7.5 to 18.6 % in 2014 and from 20.8 to 45.8 % in 2015. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1552–1633 e1 “Sphagnum species
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1124 Other claims from this paper (9) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
At high h2’ the approaches differed in genotype ranking.
ranking differed e0 different approaches e0 Verbatim
e0 “At high h2’ levels the genotypes selected by the different approaches were quite coincident, although the ranking differed . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–944 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Thresholding methods differed significantly in accuracy for estimated fine-root projected area.
total projected area e0 significantly better e0 Verbatim
e0 “some of the thresholding methods perform significantly better than others in the estimation of total projected area ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–846 t0 “roots of cork oak (Quercus suber L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–720 Other claims from this paper (1) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Gossypium hirsutumt0
Vicia faba
Tectona grandis_(32109153283).jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Cinnamomum camphora
Sphagnum
Quercus suber