View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The best processing parameters for Arctium lappa were 300 ℃ drying temperature and 4-5 minutes processing time .
Outcomebest processing parameters e0 Qualifier4-5 minutes of processing time e0 Verbatim
e0 “the best processing parameters for Arctium Lappa consisted of 300 ℃ of the drying tempera-ture and 4-5 minutes of processing time ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–461 Other claims from this paper (1) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The pH differential method had the shortest processing time .
OutcomeProcessing time (incubation time) e0 ComparatorpH differential method e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “Processing time (incubation time ) was lowest in the pH differential method ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1295 t0 “Strawberries ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–93 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Hand picking working time for processing tomato reached 142.4 hrs/10a.
Verbatim
t0 “Processing Tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–74 e0 “working time has reached 142.4hrs/10a ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1280 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Mean image processing time was 0.17s.
Outcomeaverage processing time e0 Verbatim
e0 “the average processing time is 0.17s ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–978 t0 “Ramie ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–43 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The segmentation approach has low inference time for near real- time processing .
Qualifiernear real-time processing e5 Verbatim
e1 “generate realistic and high resolution images of plant roots ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–267 e5 “low inference time for near real- time processing ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1131 Other claims from this paper (5) Method / resource author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The described confocal data processing method reduced processing time .
Organ / stagepollen and pistil e1 Outcometime needed for processing data in LCSM e0 Not reported Value
Verbatim
e0 “the time needed for processing data in LCSM will be largely decreased ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–279 e1 “with pollen and pistil of pear ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–194 Other claims from this paper (2) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
YOLOv11 required less processing time than YOLOv10.
Not reported Comparator Value
Verbatim
t0 “Crop ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–33 e0 “YOLOv11 was more efficient, consuming less computational resources and processing time ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1470 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Hand picking accounts for 52.2% of the total working time for processing tomato culture.
Outcometotal working time e0 Verbatim
t0 “Processing Tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–74 e0 “occupies 52.2% of total working time for processing tomato culture ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1351 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Image processing reduced processing time and significantly improved crop identification.
Outcometime of action and enhanced the crop identification e0 Not reported Comparator Value
Verbatim
e0 “The performance of image processing condensed the time of action and enhanced the crop identification significantly ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1353 t0 “Rice Granules ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–25 Other claims from this paper (1) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
FTIR distinguished Forsythis samples by processing time .
TaxonForsythis suspense(Thunb.)Vahl e0 Outcomedifferent processing time e0 Comparatordifferent processing time e0 Verbatim
e0 “Forsythis suspense(Thunb.)Vahl can be distinguished by different processing methods and different processing time ,according to the number,the shape and the relative intensity of the absorption peaks ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–867 Other claims from this paper (3) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.