Search claims · PlantClaims

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gin reflectance repeatability was lower than laboratory repeatability.

Taxon: cottonGossypium hirsutume1
Outcome: reflectance measurementse0
Direction: lowere0
Comparator: laboratory measurementse0

Verbatim

e0
“reflectance measurements had a lower repeatability for the gin measurements than for the laboratory measurements.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1018

e1
“Samples were collected from the cotton during gin processing throughout the ginning seasons”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–460

Title

Field Evaluation of Color/Trash Meters

W. S. Anthony Applied Engineering in Agriculture 1992. doi:10.13031/2013.26068

Other claims from this paper (12)

Method / resource Gin meters operated without maintenance problems through the seasons.
Method / resource Trash repeatability was acceptable 72% of the time for gin meters.
Method / resource Reflectance repeatability was acceptable 49% of the time for gin meters.
Method / resource Yellowness repeatability was acceptable 79% of the time for gin meters.
Method / resource Laboratory meter trash repeatability was acceptable 75% of the time.
Method / resource Laboratory meter reflectance repeatability was acceptable 81% of the time.
Method / resource With doubled tolerances, gin trash repeatability rose to 84%.
Method / resource With doubled tolerances, gin reflectance repeatability rose to 73%.
Method / resource With doubled tolerances, gin yellowness repeatability rose to 87%.
Method / resource Color grades were estimated correctly about 55% of the time.
Method / resource Color grades were estimated within one grade 94% of the time.
Recommendation Video meters were judged usable for color and trash estimation in commercial ginning.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Repeatability coefficients for leaf dry matter were high.

Taxon: Panicum maximumMegathyrsus maximust0
Outcome: repeatability coefficientse1
Direction: Highe1
Qualifier: leaf DMe1

Verbatim

t0
“Panicum maximum Jacq.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–91

e1
“High repeatability coefficients were found for the characteristic leaf DM”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1093

Title

Repeatability and genotypic stability of agronomic characteristics in Panicum maximum Jacq.

Mariane Rodrigues Ferreira; Janaina Azevedo Martuscello; Thiago Gomes dos Santos Braz; et al. Chilean journal of agricultural research 2019. doi:10.4067/s0718-58392019000400547

Other claims from this paper (5)

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Repeatability for average fruit mass was estimated at 42.06%.

Taxon: strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Outcome: repeatabilitye0
Value: 42.06%e0
Qualifier: same characterse0

Verbatim

e0
“the repeatability ranged from 9.00 to 42.06% for the same characters”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–871

t0
“strawberry”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–69

Title

Repeatability and heritability of production characters in strawberry fruits

Valter C Andrade Júnior; Altino JM Oliveira; Amanda G Guimarães; et al. Horticultura Brasileira 2020. doi:10.1590/s0102-053620200114

Other claims from this paper (6)

Observation Heritability for fruit number was estimated at 3.13%.
Observation Heritability for average fruit mass was estimated at 40.20%.
Observation Repeatability for fruit number was estimated at 9.00%.
Method / resource Forty evaluations were estimated as the maximum needed for fruit number at about 80% accuracy.
Method / resource Six evaluations were estimated as the minimum needed for average fruit mass at about 80% accuracy.
Recommendation The authors state that marketable fruit mass requires at least 20 evaluations, or at least 20 months.

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Repeatability coefficients for strawberry production and quality traits ranged from low to medium.

Taxon: strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Outcome: repeatability coefficientse0
Comparator: low to mediume0

Verbatim

t0
“strawberry”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–89

e0
“The repeatability coefficients ranged from low to medium.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1077

Title

Repeatability coefficients and number of measurements for evaluating traits in strawberry

Maria Inês Diel; Alessandro Dal'Col Lúcio; Tiago Olivoto; et al. Acta Scientiarum Agronomy 2020. doi:10.4025/actasciagron.v42i1.43357

Other claims from this paper (12)

Method / resource ANOVA gave the lowest repeatability coefficients.
Method / resource PCcov gave the highest repeatability coefficients.
Method / resource PCcov required 3.6 measurements for MF at 80% confidence.
Method / resource PCcov required 2.9 measurements for NF at 80% confidence.
Method / resource PCcov required 6.2 measurements for SST at 80% confidence.
Method / resource PCcov required 3.2 measurements for AT at 80% confidence.
Method / resource PCcov required 3.8 measurements for FIR at 80% confidence.
Method / resource PCcov required 7.3 measurements for MF at 95% confidence.
Method / resource PCcov required 14.0 measurements for NF at 95% confidence.
Method / resource PCcov required 29.6 measurements for SST at 95% confidence.
Method / resource PCcov required 15.4 measurements for AT at 95% confidence.
Method / resource PCcov required 18.1 measurements for FIR at 95% confidence.

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit weight had the highest repeatability among production characters.

Taxon: strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Organ / stage: fruite0
Outcome: repeatabilitye0
Direction: higheste0

Verbatim

e0
“the fruit weight, the character with the highest repeatability”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1006

t0
“strawberry cultivars”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–116

Title

Repeatability coefficients and the number of harvests required to estimate productivity in nine strawberry cultivars

José Luís Trevizan Chiomento; Alana Grando Dornelles; Thomas dos Santos Trentin; et al. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 2025. doi:10.1080/14620316.2025.2556866