View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
ROS production did not correlate significantly with the decrease in stomatal aperture.
Outcomedecrease in stomatal apertures e5 Directiondid not have a significant correlation e5 Verbatim
e5 “ROS production did not have a significant correlation with the decrease in stomatal apertures ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1069 t0 “Arabidopsis thaliana ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–59 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Ozone treatment caused a nonsignificant decrease in firmness, anthocyanin content, and color.
TreatmentOzone treatment e0 Outcomefirmness, anthocyanin content, and color e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Ozone treatment resulted in a non-significant decrease in firmness, anthocyanin content, and color of onion. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–785 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Chilling part of the root did not cause a significant decrease in shoot water content.
Treatmentchilling of a part of the root e1 Outcomeshoot water content e1 Directiondid not cause any significant decrease e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “maize plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 e1 “The chilling of a part of the root did not cause any significant decrease in shoot water content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–96 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Five days of water immersion caused a nonsignificant decrease in mean phenolics.
Treatmentimmersion in water for 5 days e0 Outcomemean phenolic content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The decrease in mean phenolic content following immersion in water for 5 days was not statistically significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–962 e1 “Umbilicaria mammulata (Ach.) Tuck ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–660 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Full season maize hybrids showed a nonsignificant yield decrease with maturity.
Materialfull season hybrids e0 Verbatim
e0 “non-significant decrease in grain yield with relative maturity in full season hybrids ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1130 t0 “Maize (Zea mays L.) Hybrids ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–85 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Shading did not produce a detected significant decrease in Satsuma mandarin yield.
Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “A significant decrease in yield due to shading was not detected ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–502 e1 “Satsuma mandarin (Citrus unshiu Marc.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–437 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Elevated CO2 caused a nonsignificant decrease in Bt cotton fiber quality components except uniformity.
Outcomefiber quality components e0 Qualifierexcept uniform e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “non-significant decrease the fiber quality components of Bt cotton except uniform ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–995 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
At -0.5 atm, moisture stress tended to decrease germination compared with control, without a significant difference.
Treatmentmoisture stress of -0.5 atm e0 Outcomeseed germination e0 Verbatim
e0 “Even the slighest moisture stress of -0.5 atm tended to decrease the seed germination' but the decrease in germination under the moisture stress of -O.5 atm was not significantly different from control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–460 t0 “Spruce ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–55 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Reduced water supply did not significantly decrease gas exchange parameters.
Treatmenta reduction in water supply e0 Outcomegas exchange parameters e0 Directiondid not lead to a significant decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a reduction in water supply did not lead to a significant decrease in gas exchange parameters ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–562 t0 “durum wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–113 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing gamma irradiation dose was associated with a nonsignificant decrease in mitotic in dex in mung bean meristematic cells.
Organ / stagemeristematic cells e0 Treatmentincreasing dose of gamma irradiation e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The in creasing dose of gamma irradiation caused an in significant decrease (p>0.05) in the mitotic in dex of V. radiata meristematic cells. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–703 Other claims from this paper (2) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.