Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“decrease of grain weight per panicle”

99 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

plus 3 non-evaluative

Over time

1960 ’70 ’80 ’90 2000 ’10 ’20

Refine

More filters

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Night warming during reproduction reduced yield.

Taxon: riceOryza sativat0
Treatment: Mild increase in night temperature during the reproductive growth stagee0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Mild increase in night temperature during the reproductive growth stage reduced yield which was attributed to decrease in grain weight, harvest index, grain filling (2009WS), and spikelets number per panicle (2010DS and 2011DS).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1383

t0
“rice”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–81

Title

Effects of high night temperature on yield and agronomic traits of irrigated rice under field chamber system condition

Yunbo Zhang; Qiyuan Tang; Peng Shaobing; et al. Australian Journal of Crop Science 2013

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Grain yield differed significantly between low and high night temperature in all experiments.
Intervention effect High night temperature decreased grain yield by 16.7% in the first season.
Intervention effect High night temperature decreased grain yield by 9.1% in the second season.
Intervention effect High night temperature decreased grain yield by 9.6% in the third season.
Intervention effect High night temperature decreased grain yield by 8.0% in the fourth season.
Mechanism Lower biomass and harvest index partly accounted for yield loss under high night temperature.
Mechanism Low night temperature produced higher total dry weight through higher crop growth rate.
Mechanism Yield loss under night warming was attributed to lower grain weight and harvest index.
Mechanism Yield loss in 2009WS was attributed to decreased grain filling.
Mechanism Yield loss in 2010DS and 2011DS was attributed to fewer spikelets per panicle.
Intervention effect An approximately 4-degree high versus low night temperature difference reduced mean yield 11% across four seasons.
Observation N22 was tolerant to high night temperature.
Observation PSBRc52 was tolerant to high night temperature.
Observation Swarna was tolerant to high night temperature.
Observation IR8 was tolerant to high night temperature.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity reduced spikelet fertility by 6.27%.

Taxon: riceOryza sativat0
Treatment: salinitye0 e1
Outcome: spikelet fertility per cente0 e1
Direction: decreaseinferrede0 e1
Value: 6.27e0 e1
Comparator: normale0 e1

Verbatim

e0
“spikelet fertility per cent (6.27), plant height (9.79%), panicle length (12.76%), panicle weight (17.22%), grain yield (30.25%), number of filled grains panicle−1(31.20%) and number of productive tillers plant−1 (61.33%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–755

t0
“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–100

e1
“Eight parents along with 28 hybrids were evaluated under normal as well as saline soil conditions of Agricultural Research Station, Machilipatnam during kharif 2010 to study the effect of salinity on various yield components.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–225

Title

Screening of parents, hybrids and their progenies for yield under salinity in rice (Oryza sativa L.).

M. Sudharani; P. R. Reddy; V. R. Badu; et al. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding 2013

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Salinity stunted rice growth and reduced tillering, florets per panicle, spikelet fertility, and grain yield.
Intervention effect Salinity reduced 1000-grain weight by 5.95%.
Intervention effect Salinity reduced plant height by 9.79%.
Intervention effect Salinity reduced panicle length by 12.76%.
Intervention effect Salinity reduced panicle weight by 17.22%.
Intervention effect Salinity reduced grain yield by 30.25%.
Intervention effect Salinity reduced filled grains per panicle by 31.20%.
Intervention effect Salinity reduced productive tillers per plant by 61.33%.
Observation SR26B and CSRC(S)7-1-4 were judged the best donors for saline tolerance and high yield.
Observation SR26B x CST7-1 and Swarna x CSRC(S)7-1-4 were superior hybrids under saline conditions.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NS22 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 13.97% under TR6.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: NS22e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Organ / stage: inferior grainse0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Treatment: TR6e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Outcome: average grain-filling rate (AGFR)e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Direction: decreasee0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Value: 13.97%e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Comparator: TR4e0 e1 e2 e3 e4

Verbatim

e0
“greater decrease in grain weight and average grain-filling rate (AGFR) of inferior grains (NS22: 23.19%, 13.97%; NS44: 7.78%, 5.86%) than the superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1390

t0
“wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113

e1
“after the number of wheat rows served by a single tube increased from four (TR4, control) to six (TR6)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1039

e2
“grain weight per panicle (GWP) and AGFR of superior and inferior grains in the third wheat row (RW3) of NS22 and NS44”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1615

e3
“greater decrease in grain weight and average grain-filling rate (AGFR) of inferior grains (NS22: 23.19%, 13.97%; NS44: 7.78%, 5.86%) than the superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1390

e4
“for both NS22 and NS44, the yield of TR6S was significantly higher than that of TR6 and TR6L”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2087–2179

Title

Narrowing row spacing and adding inter-block promote the grain filling and flag leaf photosynthetic rate of wheat under enlarged drip tube spacing system

Jianguo Jing; Fu Qian; Xinyi Chang; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2024. doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1368410

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS22 yield by 9.93% versus TR4.
Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS44 yield by 9.04% versus TR4.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain weight decreased 23.19% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain weight decreased 7.78% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 5.86% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain weight decreased 10.60% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain AGFR decreased 8.33% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain weight decreased 4.89% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain AGFR decreased 4.62% under TR6.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS22 third-row grain weight per panicle by 26.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS44 third-row grain weight per panicle by 8.22%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 14.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 10.50%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 5.09%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 5.01%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS22 by 20.78%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS44 by 9.91%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased AGFR in the two cultivars.
Intervention effect TR6S yielded significantly more than TR6 and TR6L in both cultivars and had the highest economic benefit.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NS44 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 5.86% under TR6.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: NS44e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Organ / stage: inferior grainse0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Treatment: TR6e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Outcome: average grain-filling rate (AGFR)e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Direction: decreasee0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Value: 5.86%e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Comparator: TR4e0 e1 e2 e3 e4

Verbatim

e0
“greater decrease in grain weight and average grain-filling rate (AGFR) of inferior grains (NS22: 23.19%, 13.97%; NS44: 7.78%, 5.86%) than the superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1390

t0
“wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113

e1
“after the number of wheat rows served by a single tube increased from four (TR4, control) to six (TR6)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1039

e2
“grain weight per panicle (GWP) and AGFR of superior and inferior grains in the third wheat row (RW3) of NS22 and NS44”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1615

e3
“greater decrease in grain weight and average grain-filling rate (AGFR) of inferior grains (NS22: 23.19%, 13.97%; NS44: 7.78%, 5.86%) than the superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1390

e4
“for both NS22 and NS44, the yield of TR6S was significantly higher than that of TR6 and TR6L”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2087–2179

Title

Narrowing row spacing and adding inter-block promote the grain filling and flag leaf photosynthetic rate of wheat under enlarged drip tube spacing system

Jianguo Jing; Fu Qian; Xinyi Chang; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2024. doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1368410

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS22 yield by 9.93% versus TR4.
Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS44 yield by 9.04% versus TR4.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain weight decreased 23.19% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 13.97% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain weight decreased 7.78% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain weight decreased 10.60% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain AGFR decreased 8.33% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain weight decreased 4.89% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain AGFR decreased 4.62% under TR6.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS22 third-row grain weight per panicle by 26.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS44 third-row grain weight per panicle by 8.22%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 14.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 10.50%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 5.09%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 5.01%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS22 by 20.78%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS44 by 9.91%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased AGFR in the two cultivars.
Intervention effect TR6S yielded significantly more than TR6 and TR6L in both cultivars and had the highest economic benefit.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NS22 superior-grain AGFR decreased 8.33% under TR6.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: NS22e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Organ / stage: superior grainse0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Treatment: TR6e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Outcome: average grain-filling ratee0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Direction: decreasee0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Value: 8.33%e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Comparator: TR4e0 e1 e2 e3 e4

Verbatim

e0
“superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1333–1390

t0
“wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113

e1
“after the number of wheat rows served by a single tube increased from four (TR4, control) to six (TR6)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1039

e2
“grain weight per panicle (GWP) and AGFR of superior and inferior grains in the third wheat row (RW3) of NS22 and NS44”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1615

e3
“greater decrease in grain weight and average grain-filling rate (AGFR) of inferior grains (NS22: 23.19%, 13.97%; NS44: 7.78%, 5.86%) than the superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1390

e4
“for both NS22 and NS44, the yield of TR6S was significantly higher than that of TR6 and TR6L”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2087–2179

Title

Narrowing row spacing and adding inter-block promote the grain filling and flag leaf photosynthetic rate of wheat under enlarged drip tube spacing system

Jianguo Jing; Fu Qian; Xinyi Chang; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2024. doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1368410

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS22 yield by 9.93% versus TR4.
Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS44 yield by 9.04% versus TR4.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain weight decreased 23.19% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 13.97% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain weight decreased 7.78% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 5.86% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain weight decreased 10.60% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain weight decreased 4.89% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain AGFR decreased 4.62% under TR6.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS22 third-row grain weight per panicle by 26.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS44 third-row grain weight per panicle by 8.22%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 14.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 10.50%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 5.09%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 5.01%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS22 by 20.78%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS44 by 9.91%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased AGFR in the two cultivars.
Intervention effect TR6S yielded significantly more than TR6 and TR6L in both cultivars and had the highest economic benefit.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NS44 superior-grain AGFR decreased 4.62% under TR6.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: NS44e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Organ / stage: superior grainse0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Treatment: TR6e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Outcome: average grain-filling ratee0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Direction: decreasee0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Value: 4.62%e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Comparator: TR4e0 e1 e2 e3 e4

Verbatim

e0
“superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1333–1390

t0
“wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113

e1
“after the number of wheat rows served by a single tube increased from four (TR4, control) to six (TR6)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1039

e2
“grain weight per panicle (GWP) and AGFR of superior and inferior grains in the third wheat row (RW3) of NS22 and NS44”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1615

e3
“greater decrease in grain weight and average grain-filling rate (AGFR) of inferior grains (NS22: 23.19%, 13.97%; NS44: 7.78%, 5.86%) than the superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1390

e4
“for both NS22 and NS44, the yield of TR6S was significantly higher than that of TR6 and TR6L”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2087–2179

Title

Narrowing row spacing and adding inter-block promote the grain filling and flag leaf photosynthetic rate of wheat under enlarged drip tube spacing system

Jianguo Jing; Fu Qian; Xinyi Chang; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2024. doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1368410

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS22 yield by 9.93% versus TR4.
Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS44 yield by 9.04% versus TR4.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain weight decreased 23.19% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 13.97% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain weight decreased 7.78% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 5.86% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain weight decreased 10.60% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain AGFR decreased 8.33% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain weight decreased 4.89% under TR6.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS22 third-row grain weight per panicle by 26.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS44 third-row grain weight per panicle by 8.22%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 14.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 10.50%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 5.09%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 5.01%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS22 by 20.78%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS44 by 9.91%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased AGFR in the two cultivars.
Intervention effect TR6S yielded significantly more than TR6 and TR6L in both cultivars and had the highest economic benefit.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Introgressing Sub1 into local swamp rice raised the percentage of plants surviving 14 days of submergence compared with parents.

Taxon: riceOryza sativae0
Material: BC1F1e1
Treatment: submergence stress for 14 dayse1
Gene: Sub1 genee2
Outcome: percentage of survived plantse2
Direction: highere2
Comparator: parentse2

Verbatim

e0
“increase rice production at swamp area”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–65

e1
“plant tolerance after submergence stress for 14 days in BC1F1 of crosses between local superior varieties and Sub1 gen donor (FR13A)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–324

e2
“The results showed that introgression of Sub1 gene into local varieties improved submergence tolerance as indicated by higher percentage of survived plants, lower decrease of plant dry weight, and lower decrease of grain weight per panicle compared to parents”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1380

Title

Peningkatan Toleransi Rendaman Padi Lokal Rawa Lebak dengan Introgresi Gen Sub1

Gusmiatun ,; Rujito A. Suwignyo; Rujito A. Suwignyo; et al. Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Agronomy) 2015. doi:10.24831/jai.v43i2.10409

Other claims from this paper (2)

Intervention effect Introgressing Sub1 lowered the decrease in plant dry weight after submergence compared with parents.
Intervention effect Introgressing Sub1 lowered the decrease in grain weight per panicle after submergence compared with parents.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under elevated CO2, rice vegetative tillers increased by 18% relative to ambient CO2.

Taxon: riceOryza sativae0
Treatment: elevated CO2e1
Outcome: vegetative tillerse0
Direction: moree0
Value: 18%e0
Comparator: ambient CO2e0

Verbatim

e0
“rice plants had more vegetative tillers (18%) and reproductive tillers (22.1%), but there was a decrease in 1000-seed weight (11.2%), seed number per panicle (3.91%), and grain yield (18.8%) in comparison to ambient CO2 grown rice plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–596

e1
“Under elevated CO2”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 339–357

Title

EVALUATION OF THE EFFECT OF ELEVATED CO2 ON BIOEFFICACY OF BUPROFEZIN INSECTICIDE AGAINST BROWN PLANT HOPPER, Nilaparvata lugens (STÅL)

Srinivasa N; Subhash Chander; Padala Vinod Kumar Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences 2021. doi:10.18006/2021.9(1).5.11

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Under elevated CO2, rice reproductive tillers increased by 22.1% relative to ambient CO2.
Intervention effect Under elevated CO2, rice 1000-seed weight decreased by 11.2% relative to ambient CO2.
Intervention effect Under elevated CO2, rice seed number per panicle decreased by 3.91% relative to ambient CO2.
Intervention effect Under elevated CO2, rice grain yield decreased by 18.8% relative to ambient CO2.
Intervention effect 700 l/ha spray gave higher BPH mortality at ambient than elevated CO2.
Intervention effect 600 l/ha spray gave higher BPH mortality at ambient than elevated CO2.
Intervention effect 500 l/ha spray gave higher BPH mortality at ambient than elevated CO2.
Intervention effect 400 l/ha spray gave higher BPH mortality at ambient than elevated CO2.
Observation BPH population was higher in 2017 than in 2018.
Mechanism Higher canopy size under elevated CO2 could explain lower efficacy of 500 l/ha spray against BPH.
Recommendation The authors recommend revising spray volumes for effective BPH management under climate change.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under elevated CO2, rice reproductive tillers increased by 22.1% relative to ambient CO2.

Taxon: riceOryza sativae0
Treatment: elevated CO2e1
Outcome: reproductive tillerse0
Direction: moree0
Value: 22.1%e0
Comparator: ambient CO2e0

Verbatim

e0
“rice plants had more vegetative tillers (18%) and reproductive tillers (22.1%), but there was a decrease in 1000-seed weight (11.2%), seed number per panicle (3.91%), and grain yield (18.8%) in comparison to ambient CO2 grown rice plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–596

e1
“Under elevated CO2”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 339–357

Title

EVALUATION OF THE EFFECT OF ELEVATED CO2 ON BIOEFFICACY OF BUPROFEZIN INSECTICIDE AGAINST BROWN PLANT HOPPER, Nilaparvata lugens (STÅL)

Srinivasa N; Subhash Chander; Padala Vinod Kumar Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences 2021. doi:10.18006/2021.9(1).5.11

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Under elevated CO2, rice vegetative tillers increased by 18% relative to ambient CO2.
Intervention effect Under elevated CO2, rice 1000-seed weight decreased by 11.2% relative to ambient CO2.
Intervention effect Under elevated CO2, rice seed number per panicle decreased by 3.91% relative to ambient CO2.
Intervention effect Under elevated CO2, rice grain yield decreased by 18.8% relative to ambient CO2.
Intervention effect 700 l/ha spray gave higher BPH mortality at ambient than elevated CO2.
Intervention effect 600 l/ha spray gave higher BPH mortality at ambient than elevated CO2.
Intervention effect 500 l/ha spray gave higher BPH mortality at ambient than elevated CO2.
Intervention effect 400 l/ha spray gave higher BPH mortality at ambient than elevated CO2.
Observation BPH population was higher in 2017 than in 2018.
Mechanism Higher canopy size under elevated CO2 could explain lower efficacy of 500 l/ha spray against BPH.
Recommendation The authors recommend revising spray volumes for effective BPH management under climate change.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 14.05%.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: NS22e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Treatment: TR6Le0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Outcome: AGFRe0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Direction: increasede0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Value: 14.05%e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Comparator: TR6e0 e1 e2 e3 e4

Verbatim

e0
“under TR6L increased significantly by 26.05%, 8.22%, 14.05%, 10.50%, 5.09%, and 5.01%, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1616–1715

t0
“wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113

e1
“after the number of wheat rows served by a single tube increased from four (TR4, control) to six (TR6)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1039

e2
“grain weight per panicle (GWP) and AGFR of superior and inferior grains in the third wheat row (RW3) of NS22 and NS44”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1615

e3
“greater decrease in grain weight and average grain-filling rate (AGFR) of inferior grains (NS22: 23.19%, 13.97%; NS44: 7.78%, 5.86%) than the superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1390

e4
“for both NS22 and NS44, the yield of TR6S was significantly higher than that of TR6 and TR6L”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2087–2179

Title

Narrowing row spacing and adding inter-block promote the grain filling and flag leaf photosynthetic rate of wheat under enlarged drip tube spacing system

Jianguo Jing; Fu Qian; Xinyi Chang; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2024. doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1368410

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS22 yield by 9.93% versus TR4.
Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS44 yield by 9.04% versus TR4.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain weight decreased 23.19% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 13.97% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain weight decreased 7.78% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 5.86% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain weight decreased 10.60% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain AGFR decreased 8.33% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain weight decreased 4.89% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain AGFR decreased 4.62% under TR6.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS22 third-row grain weight per panicle by 26.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS44 third-row grain weight per panicle by 8.22%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 10.50%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 5.09%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 5.01%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS22 by 20.78%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS44 by 9.91%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased AGFR in the two cultivars.
Intervention effect TR6S yielded significantly more than TR6 and TR6L in both cultivars and had the highest economic benefit.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“decrease of grain weight per panicle”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics