Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“decrease in relative water content”

10 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

plus 4 non-evaluative

Over time

2010

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

paper W2188723132 ✕

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought decreased relative leaf water content, stomatal conductance and net CO2 assimilation rate in maize line KS140 compared with well-watered plants.

Taxon: maizeZea mayse2
Material: line KS140e2
Organ / stage: V5 or V6 leaf stagee2
Treatment: withholding water for 10 dayse2
Outcome: relative leaf water content, stomatal conductance, net CO2 assimilation ratee1
Direction: decreasee1
Comparator: well-watered plantse1

Verbatim

e2
“inbred maize (Zea mays L.) line KS140 was subjected to drought stress by withholding water for 10 days at the V5 or V6 leaf stage”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–264

e1
“Water-deficient plants experienced a decrease in relative leaf water content, stomatal conductance, net CO2 assimilation rate, and water use efficiency compared to well-watered plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–449

Title

Physiological and proteomic analysis of the response to drought stress in an inbred Korean maize line

Sang-Gon Kim; Lee Jinseok; Jung‐Tae Kim; et al. Plant Omics 2015

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Drought decreased water use efficiency in maize line KS140 compared with well-watered plants.
Intervention effect Drought reduced leaf area in maize line KS140 by 75% compared with well-watered plants.
Intervention effect Drought reduced aerial tissue dry matter by 64% in maize line KS140 compared with well-watered plants.
Intervention effect Drought reduced root dry matter by 56% in maize line KS140 compared with well-watered plants.
Intervention effect Leaf chlorophyll content was unchanged under drought in maize line KS140.
Intervention effect Twenty-nine protein spots were differentially expressed between well-watered and water-deficient maize plants.
Intervention effect Of the differentially expressed protein spots, 24 were up-regulated in water-deficient maize plants.
Intervention effect Of the differentially expressed protein spots, 5 were down-regulated in water-deficient maize plants.
Observation 34% of the identified proteins were involved in metabolism in drought-treated maize.
Observation 24% of the identified proteins were involved in response to stress in drought-treated maize.
Observation 14% of the identified proteins were involved in photosynthesis in drought-treated maize.
Observation 7% of the identified proteins were involved in protein modification in drought-treated maize.
Observation 14% of the identified proteins were of unknown function in drought-treated maize.
Intervention effect Two pathogenesis-related proteins, an abscisic stress-ripening protein and heat shock protein 1 were expressed only under drought in maize.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought decreased water use efficiency in maize line KS140 compared with well-watered plants.

Taxon: maizeZea mayse2
Material: line KS140e2
Organ / stage: V5 or V6 leaf stagee2
Treatment: withholding water for 10 dayse2
Outcome: water use efficiencye1
Direction: decreasee1
Comparator: well-watered plantse1

Verbatim

e2
“inbred maize (Zea mays L.) line KS140 was subjected to drought stress by withholding water for 10 days at the V5 or V6 leaf stage”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–264

e1
“Water-deficient plants experienced a decrease in relative leaf water content, stomatal conductance, net CO2 assimilation rate, and water use efficiency compared to well-watered plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–449

Title

Physiological and proteomic analysis of the response to drought stress in an inbred Korean maize line

Sang-Gon Kim; Lee Jinseok; Jung‐Tae Kim; et al. Plant Omics 2015

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Drought decreased relative leaf water content, stomatal conductance and net CO2 assimilation rate in maize line KS140 compared with well-watered plants.
Intervention effect Drought reduced leaf area in maize line KS140 by 75% compared with well-watered plants.
Intervention effect Drought reduced aerial tissue dry matter by 64% in maize line KS140 compared with well-watered plants.
Intervention effect Drought reduced root dry matter by 56% in maize line KS140 compared with well-watered plants.
Intervention effect Leaf chlorophyll content was unchanged under drought in maize line KS140.
Intervention effect Twenty-nine protein spots were differentially expressed between well-watered and water-deficient maize plants.
Intervention effect Of the differentially expressed protein spots, 24 were up-regulated in water-deficient maize plants.
Intervention effect Of the differentially expressed protein spots, 5 were down-regulated in water-deficient maize plants.
Observation 34% of the identified proteins were involved in metabolism in drought-treated maize.
Observation 24% of the identified proteins were involved in response to stress in drought-treated maize.
Observation 14% of the identified proteins were involved in photosynthesis in drought-treated maize.
Observation 7% of the identified proteins were involved in protein modification in drought-treated maize.
Observation 14% of the identified proteins were of unknown function in drought-treated maize.
Intervention effect Two pathogenesis-related proteins, an abscisic stress-ripening protein and heat shock protein 1 were expressed only under drought in maize.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf chlorophyll content was unchanged under drought in maize line KS140.

Taxon: maizeZea mayse2
Material: line KS140e2
Organ / stage: V5 or V6 leaf stagee2
Treatment: withholding water for 10 dayse2
Outcome: Leaf chlorophyll contente4
Direction: unchangede4
Comparator: well-watered plantse1

Verbatim

e2
“inbred maize (Zea mays L.) line KS140 was subjected to drought stress by withholding water for 10 days at the V5 or V6 leaf stage”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–264

e1
“Water-deficient plants experienced a decrease in relative leaf water content, stomatal conductance, net CO2 assimilation rate, and water use efficiency compared to well-watered plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–449

e4
“Leaf chlorophyll content was unchanged”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–703

Title

Physiological and proteomic analysis of the response to drought stress in an inbred Korean maize line

Sang-Gon Kim; Lee Jinseok; Jung‐Tae Kim; et al. Plant Omics 2015

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Drought decreased relative leaf water content, stomatal conductance and net CO2 assimilation rate in maize line KS140 compared with well-watered plants.
Intervention effect Drought decreased water use efficiency in maize line KS140 compared with well-watered plants.
Intervention effect Drought reduced leaf area in maize line KS140 by 75% compared with well-watered plants.
Intervention effect Drought reduced aerial tissue dry matter by 64% in maize line KS140 compared with well-watered plants.
Intervention effect Drought reduced root dry matter by 56% in maize line KS140 compared with well-watered plants.
Intervention effect Twenty-nine protein spots were differentially expressed between well-watered and water-deficient maize plants.
Intervention effect Of the differentially expressed protein spots, 24 were up-regulated in water-deficient maize plants.
Intervention effect Of the differentially expressed protein spots, 5 were down-regulated in water-deficient maize plants.
Observation 34% of the identified proteins were involved in metabolism in drought-treated maize.
Observation 24% of the identified proteins were involved in response to stress in drought-treated maize.
Observation 14% of the identified proteins were involved in photosynthesis in drought-treated maize.
Observation 7% of the identified proteins were involved in protein modification in drought-treated maize.
Observation 14% of the identified proteins were of unknown function in drought-treated maize.
Intervention effect Two pathogenesis-related proteins, an abscisic stress-ripening protein and heat shock protein 1 were expressed only under drought in maize.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced leaf area in maize line KS140 by 75% compared with well-watered plants.

Taxon: maizeZea mayse2
Material: line KS140e2
Organ / stage: V5 or V6 leaf stagee2
Treatment: withholding water for 10 dayse2
Outcome: leaf areae3
Direction: decreasee3
Value: 75%e3
Comparator: well-watered plantse1

Verbatim

e2
“inbred maize (Zea mays L.) line KS140 was subjected to drought stress by withholding water for 10 days at the V5 or V6 leaf stage”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–264

e1
“Water-deficient plants experienced a decrease in relative leaf water content, stomatal conductance, net CO2 assimilation rate, and water use efficiency compared to well-watered plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–449

e3
“resulted in severe growth retardation (75% decrease in leaf area, and 64% and 56% decrease in aerial tissue and root dry matter, respectively)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–663

Title

Physiological and proteomic analysis of the response to drought stress in an inbred Korean maize line

Sang-Gon Kim; Lee Jinseok; Jung‐Tae Kim; et al. Plant Omics 2015

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Drought decreased relative leaf water content, stomatal conductance and net CO2 assimilation rate in maize line KS140 compared with well-watered plants.
Intervention effect Drought decreased water use efficiency in maize line KS140 compared with well-watered plants.
Intervention effect Drought reduced aerial tissue dry matter by 64% in maize line KS140 compared with well-watered plants.
Intervention effect Drought reduced root dry matter by 56% in maize line KS140 compared with well-watered plants.
Intervention effect Leaf chlorophyll content was unchanged under drought in maize line KS140.
Intervention effect Twenty-nine protein spots were differentially expressed between well-watered and water-deficient maize plants.
Intervention effect Of the differentially expressed protein spots, 24 were up-regulated in water-deficient maize plants.
Intervention effect Of the differentially expressed protein spots, 5 were down-regulated in water-deficient maize plants.
Observation 34% of the identified proteins were involved in metabolism in drought-treated maize.
Observation 24% of the identified proteins were involved in response to stress in drought-treated maize.
Observation 14% of the identified proteins were involved in photosynthesis in drought-treated maize.
Observation 7% of the identified proteins were involved in protein modification in drought-treated maize.
Observation 14% of the identified proteins were of unknown function in drought-treated maize.
Intervention effect Two pathogenesis-related proteins, an abscisic stress-ripening protein and heat shock protein 1 were expressed only under drought in maize.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced aerial tissue dry matter by 64% in maize line KS140 compared with well-watered plants.

Taxon: maizeZea mayse2
Material: line KS140e2
Organ / stage: V5 or V6 leaf stagee2
Treatment: withholding water for 10 dayse2
Outcome: aerial tissuee3
Direction: decreasee3
Value: 64%e3
Comparator: well-watered plantse1

Verbatim

e2
“inbred maize (Zea mays L.) line KS140 was subjected to drought stress by withholding water for 10 days at the V5 or V6 leaf stage”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–264

e1
“Water-deficient plants experienced a decrease in relative leaf water content, stomatal conductance, net CO2 assimilation rate, and water use efficiency compared to well-watered plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–449

e3
“resulted in severe growth retardation (75% decrease in leaf area, and 64% and 56% decrease in aerial tissue and root dry matter, respectively)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–663

Title

Physiological and proteomic analysis of the response to drought stress in an inbred Korean maize line

Sang-Gon Kim; Lee Jinseok; Jung‐Tae Kim; et al. Plant Omics 2015

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Drought decreased relative leaf water content, stomatal conductance and net CO2 assimilation rate in maize line KS140 compared with well-watered plants.
Intervention effect Drought decreased water use efficiency in maize line KS140 compared with well-watered plants.
Intervention effect Drought reduced leaf area in maize line KS140 by 75% compared with well-watered plants.
Intervention effect Drought reduced root dry matter by 56% in maize line KS140 compared with well-watered plants.
Intervention effect Leaf chlorophyll content was unchanged under drought in maize line KS140.
Intervention effect Twenty-nine protein spots were differentially expressed between well-watered and water-deficient maize plants.
Intervention effect Of the differentially expressed protein spots, 24 were up-regulated in water-deficient maize plants.
Intervention effect Of the differentially expressed protein spots, 5 were down-regulated in water-deficient maize plants.
Observation 34% of the identified proteins were involved in metabolism in drought-treated maize.
Observation 24% of the identified proteins were involved in response to stress in drought-treated maize.
Observation 14% of the identified proteins were involved in photosynthesis in drought-treated maize.
Observation 7% of the identified proteins were involved in protein modification in drought-treated maize.
Observation 14% of the identified proteins were of unknown function in drought-treated maize.
Intervention effect Two pathogenesis-related proteins, an abscisic stress-ripening protein and heat shock protein 1 were expressed only under drought in maize.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced root dry matter by 56% in maize line KS140 compared with well-watered plants.

Taxon: maizeZea mayse2
Material: line KS140e2
Organ / stage: V5 or V6 leaf stagee2
Treatment: withholding water for 10 dayse2
Outcome: root dry mattere3
Direction: decreasee3
Value: 56%e3
Comparator: well-watered plantse1

Verbatim

e2
“inbred maize (Zea mays L.) line KS140 was subjected to drought stress by withholding water for 10 days at the V5 or V6 leaf stage”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–264

e1
“Water-deficient plants experienced a decrease in relative leaf water content, stomatal conductance, net CO2 assimilation rate, and water use efficiency compared to well-watered plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–449

e3
“resulted in severe growth retardation (75% decrease in leaf area, and 64% and 56% decrease in aerial tissue and root dry matter, respectively)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–663

Title

Physiological and proteomic analysis of the response to drought stress in an inbred Korean maize line

Sang-Gon Kim; Lee Jinseok; Jung‐Tae Kim; et al. Plant Omics 2015

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Drought decreased relative leaf water content, stomatal conductance and net CO2 assimilation rate in maize line KS140 compared with well-watered plants.
Intervention effect Drought decreased water use efficiency in maize line KS140 compared with well-watered plants.
Intervention effect Drought reduced leaf area in maize line KS140 by 75% compared with well-watered plants.
Intervention effect Drought reduced aerial tissue dry matter by 64% in maize line KS140 compared with well-watered plants.
Intervention effect Leaf chlorophyll content was unchanged under drought in maize line KS140.
Intervention effect Twenty-nine protein spots were differentially expressed between well-watered and water-deficient maize plants.
Intervention effect Of the differentially expressed protein spots, 24 were up-regulated in water-deficient maize plants.
Intervention effect Of the differentially expressed protein spots, 5 were down-regulated in water-deficient maize plants.
Observation 34% of the identified proteins were involved in metabolism in drought-treated maize.
Observation 24% of the identified proteins were involved in response to stress in drought-treated maize.
Observation 14% of the identified proteins were involved in photosynthesis in drought-treated maize.
Observation 7% of the identified proteins were involved in protein modification in drought-treated maize.
Observation 14% of the identified proteins were of unknown function in drought-treated maize.
Intervention effect Two pathogenesis-related proteins, an abscisic stress-ripening protein and heat shock protein 1 were expressed only under drought in maize.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Of the differentially expressed protein spots, 5 were down-regulated in water-deficient maize plants.

Taxon: maizeZea mayse2
Material: line KS140e2
Organ / stage: V5 or V6 leaf stagee2
Treatment: withholding water for 10 dayse2
Outcome: protein spotse6
Direction: decreaseinferrede6
Value: 5e6
Comparator: well-watered plantse1

Verbatim

e2
“inbred maize (Zea mays L.) line KS140 was subjected to drought stress by withholding water for 10 days at the V5 or V6 leaf stage”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–264

e1
“Water-deficient plants experienced a decrease in relative leaf water content, stomatal conductance, net CO2 assimilation rate, and water use efficiency compared to well-watered plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–449

e6
“Of the 29 differentially expressed proteins, 24 and 5 protein spots were up- and down-regulated in water-deficient plants, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1255

Title

Physiological and proteomic analysis of the response to drought stress in an inbred Korean maize line

Sang-Gon Kim; Lee Jinseok; Jung‐Tae Kim; et al. Plant Omics 2015

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Drought decreased relative leaf water content, stomatal conductance and net CO2 assimilation rate in maize line KS140 compared with well-watered plants.
Intervention effect Drought decreased water use efficiency in maize line KS140 compared with well-watered plants.
Intervention effect Drought reduced leaf area in maize line KS140 by 75% compared with well-watered plants.
Intervention effect Drought reduced aerial tissue dry matter by 64% in maize line KS140 compared with well-watered plants.
Intervention effect Drought reduced root dry matter by 56% in maize line KS140 compared with well-watered plants.
Intervention effect Leaf chlorophyll content was unchanged under drought in maize line KS140.
Intervention effect Twenty-nine protein spots were differentially expressed between well-watered and water-deficient maize plants.
Intervention effect Of the differentially expressed protein spots, 24 were up-regulated in water-deficient maize plants.
Observation 34% of the identified proteins were involved in metabolism in drought-treated maize.
Observation 24% of the identified proteins were involved in response to stress in drought-treated maize.
Observation 14% of the identified proteins were involved in photosynthesis in drought-treated maize.
Observation 7% of the identified proteins were involved in protein modification in drought-treated maize.
Observation 14% of the identified proteins were of unknown function in drought-treated maize.
Intervention effect Two pathogenesis-related proteins, an abscisic stress-ripening protein and heat shock protein 1 were expressed only under drought in maize.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twenty-nine protein spots were differentially expressed between well-watered and water-deficient maize plants.

Taxon: maizeZea mayse2
Material: line KS140e2
Organ / stage: V5 or V6 leaf stagee2
Treatment: withholding water for 10 dayse2
Outcome: protein spotse5
Direction: Differential expressione5
Value: 29e5
Comparator: well-watered plantse1

Verbatim

e2
“inbred maize (Zea mays L.) line KS140 was subjected to drought stress by withholding water for 10 days at the V5 or V6 leaf stage”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–264

e1
“Water-deficient plants experienced a decrease in relative leaf water content, stomatal conductance, net CO2 assimilation rate, and water use efficiency compared to well-watered plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–449

e5
“Differential expression was observed for 29 protein spots, and these were identified using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–945

Title

Physiological and proteomic analysis of the response to drought stress in an inbred Korean maize line

Sang-Gon Kim; Lee Jinseok; Jung‐Tae Kim; et al. Plant Omics 2015

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Drought decreased relative leaf water content, stomatal conductance and net CO2 assimilation rate in maize line KS140 compared with well-watered plants.
Intervention effect Drought decreased water use efficiency in maize line KS140 compared with well-watered plants.
Intervention effect Drought reduced leaf area in maize line KS140 by 75% compared with well-watered plants.
Intervention effect Drought reduced aerial tissue dry matter by 64% in maize line KS140 compared with well-watered plants.
Intervention effect Drought reduced root dry matter by 56% in maize line KS140 compared with well-watered plants.
Intervention effect Leaf chlorophyll content was unchanged under drought in maize line KS140.
Intervention effect Of the differentially expressed protein spots, 24 were up-regulated in water-deficient maize plants.
Intervention effect Of the differentially expressed protein spots, 5 were down-regulated in water-deficient maize plants.
Observation 34% of the identified proteins were involved in metabolism in drought-treated maize.
Observation 24% of the identified proteins were involved in response to stress in drought-treated maize.
Observation 14% of the identified proteins were involved in photosynthesis in drought-treated maize.
Observation 7% of the identified proteins were involved in protein modification in drought-treated maize.
Observation 14% of the identified proteins were of unknown function in drought-treated maize.
Intervention effect Two pathogenesis-related proteins, an abscisic stress-ripening protein and heat shock protein 1 were expressed only under drought in maize.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Of the differentially expressed protein spots, 24 were up-regulated in water-deficient maize plants.

Taxon: maizeZea mayse2
Material: line KS140e2
Organ / stage: V5 or V6 leaf stagee2
Treatment: withholding water for 10 dayse2
Outcome: protein spotse6
Direction: increaseinferrede6
Value: 24e6
Comparator: well-watered plantse1

Verbatim

e2
“inbred maize (Zea mays L.) line KS140 was subjected to drought stress by withholding water for 10 days at the V5 or V6 leaf stage”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–264

e1
“Water-deficient plants experienced a decrease in relative leaf water content, stomatal conductance, net CO2 assimilation rate, and water use efficiency compared to well-watered plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–449

e6
“Of the 29 differentially expressed proteins, 24 and 5 protein spots were up- and down-regulated in water-deficient plants, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1255

Title

Physiological and proteomic analysis of the response to drought stress in an inbred Korean maize line

Sang-Gon Kim; Lee Jinseok; Jung‐Tae Kim; et al. Plant Omics 2015

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Drought decreased relative leaf water content, stomatal conductance and net CO2 assimilation rate in maize line KS140 compared with well-watered plants.
Intervention effect Drought decreased water use efficiency in maize line KS140 compared with well-watered plants.
Intervention effect Drought reduced leaf area in maize line KS140 by 75% compared with well-watered plants.
Intervention effect Drought reduced aerial tissue dry matter by 64% in maize line KS140 compared with well-watered plants.
Intervention effect Drought reduced root dry matter by 56% in maize line KS140 compared with well-watered plants.
Intervention effect Leaf chlorophyll content was unchanged under drought in maize line KS140.
Intervention effect Twenty-nine protein spots were differentially expressed between well-watered and water-deficient maize plants.
Intervention effect Of the differentially expressed protein spots, 5 were down-regulated in water-deficient maize plants.
Observation 34% of the identified proteins were involved in metabolism in drought-treated maize.
Observation 24% of the identified proteins were involved in response to stress in drought-treated maize.
Observation 14% of the identified proteins were involved in photosynthesis in drought-treated maize.
Observation 7% of the identified proteins were involved in protein modification in drought-treated maize.
Observation 14% of the identified proteins were of unknown function in drought-treated maize.
Intervention effect Two pathogenesis-related proteins, an abscisic stress-ripening protein and heat shock protein 1 were expressed only under drought in maize.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two pathogenesis-related proteins, an abscisic stress-ripening protein and heat shock protein 1 were expressed only under drought in maize.

Taxon: maizeZea mayse2
Material: line KS140e2
Organ / stage: V5 or V6 leaf stagee2
Treatment: drought conditionse0
Gene: pathogenesis-related proteinse0
Outcome: expressede0
Qualifier: an abscisic stress-ripening protein and heat shock protein 1e0
Comparator: well-watered plantse1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e2
“inbred maize (Zea mays L.) line KS140 was subjected to drought stress by withholding water for 10 days at the V5 or V6 leaf stage”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–264

e1
“Water-deficient plants experienced a decrease in relative leaf water content, stomatal conductance, net CO2 assimilation rate, and water use efficiency compared to well-watered plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–449

e0
“Two pathogenesis-related proteins, an abscisic stress-ripening protein and heat shock protein 1, were expressed only under drought conditions”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1398

Title

Physiological and proteomic analysis of the response to drought stress in an inbred Korean maize line

Sang-Gon Kim; Lee Jinseok; Jung‐Tae Kim; et al. Plant Omics 2015

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Drought decreased relative leaf water content, stomatal conductance and net CO2 assimilation rate in maize line KS140 compared with well-watered plants.
Intervention effect Drought decreased water use efficiency in maize line KS140 compared with well-watered plants.
Intervention effect Drought reduced leaf area in maize line KS140 by 75% compared with well-watered plants.
Intervention effect Drought reduced aerial tissue dry matter by 64% in maize line KS140 compared with well-watered plants.
Intervention effect Drought reduced root dry matter by 56% in maize line KS140 compared with well-watered plants.
Intervention effect Leaf chlorophyll content was unchanged under drought in maize line KS140.
Intervention effect Twenty-nine protein spots were differentially expressed between well-watered and water-deficient maize plants.
Intervention effect Of the differentially expressed protein spots, 24 were up-regulated in water-deficient maize plants.
Intervention effect Of the differentially expressed protein spots, 5 were down-regulated in water-deficient maize plants.
Observation 34% of the identified proteins were involved in metabolism in drought-treated maize.
Observation 24% of the identified proteins were involved in response to stress in drought-treated maize.
Observation 14% of the identified proteins were involved in photosynthesis in drought-treated maize.
Observation 7% of the identified proteins were involved in protein modification in drought-treated maize.
Observation 14% of the identified proteins were of unknown function in drought-treated maize.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“decrease in relative water content”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics