Paper · 2015 · Plant Omics

Physiological and proteomic analysis of the response to drought stress in an inbred Korean maize line

Sang-Gon Kim; Lee Jinseok; Jung‐Tae Kim; et al.

15
claims
38
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Understanding the response of a crop to water deficiency is the first step towards breeding drought-tolerant varieties. In this study, inbred maize (Zea mays L.) line KS140 was subjected to drought stress by withholding water for 10 days at the V5 or V6 leaf stage. Water-deficient plants experienced a decrease in relative leaf water content, stomatal conductance, net CO2 assimilation rate, and water use efficiency compared to well-watered plants. This was accompanied by a decrease in the relative water content that resulted in severe growth retardation (75% decrease in leaf area, and 64% and 56% decrease in aerial tissue and root dry matter, respectively). Leaf chlorophyll content was unchanged. Two-dimensional electrophoresis protein expression profiles were compared between wellwatered and water-deficient plants. Differential expression was observed for 29 protein spots, and these were identified using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Of these proteins, 34% were involved in metabolism, 24% in response to stress, 14% in photosynthesis, 7% in protein modification, and 14% were proteins of unknown function. Of the 29 differentially expressed proteins, 24 and 5 protein spots were up- and down-regulated in water-deficient plants, respectively. Two pathogenesis-related proteins, an abscisic stress-ripening protein and heat shock protein 1, were expressed only under drought conditions. This study provides a protein profile of a Korean maize inbred line during drought stress, which will be valuable for future studies of the molecular mechanisms underlying drought resistance and for development of selective breeding markers for drought tolerance in maize.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought decreased relative leaf water content, stomatal conductance and net CO2 assimilation rate in maize line KS140 compared with well-watered plants.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Material
line KS140e2
Organ / stage
V5 or V6 leaf stagee2
Treatment
withholding water for 10 dayse2
Outcome
relative leaf water content, stomatal conductance, net CO2 assimilation ratee1
Direction
decreasee1
Comparator
well-watered plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“inbred maize (Zea mays L.) line KS140 was subjected to drought stress by withholding water for 10 days at the V5 or V6 leaf stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–264 · show in text ↑
e1

“Water-deficient plants experienced a decrease in relative leaf water content, stomatal conductance, net CO2 assimilation rate, and water use efficiency compared to well-watered plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–449 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought decreased water use efficiency in maize line KS140 compared with well-watered plants.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Material
line KS140e2
Organ / stage
V5 or V6 leaf stagee2
Treatment
withholding water for 10 dayse2
Outcome
water use efficiencye1
Direction
decreasee1
Comparator
well-watered plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“inbred maize (Zea mays L.) line KS140 was subjected to drought stress by withholding water for 10 days at the V5 or V6 leaf stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–264 · show in text ↑
e1

“Water-deficient plants experienced a decrease in relative leaf water content, stomatal conductance, net CO2 assimilation rate, and water use efficiency compared to well-watered plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–449 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced leaf area in maize line KS140 by 75% compared with well-watered plants.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Material
line KS140e2
Organ / stage
V5 or V6 leaf stagee2
Treatment
withholding water for 10 dayse2
Outcome
leaf areae3
Direction
decreasee3
Value
75%e3
Comparator
well-watered plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“inbred maize (Zea mays L.) line KS140 was subjected to drought stress by withholding water for 10 days at the V5 or V6 leaf stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–264 · show in text ↑
e1

“Water-deficient plants experienced a decrease in relative leaf water content, stomatal conductance, net CO2 assimilation rate, and water use efficiency compared to well-watered plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–449 · show in text ↑
e3

“resulted in severe growth retardation (75% decrease in leaf area, and 64% and 56% decrease in aerial tissue and root dry matter, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–663 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced aerial tissue dry matter by 64% in maize line KS140 compared with well-watered plants.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Material
line KS140e2
Organ / stage
V5 or V6 leaf stagee2
Treatment
withholding water for 10 dayse2
Outcome
aerial tissuee3
Direction
decreasee3
Value
64%e3
Comparator
well-watered plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“inbred maize (Zea mays L.) line KS140 was subjected to drought stress by withholding water for 10 days at the V5 or V6 leaf stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–264 · show in text ↑
e1

“Water-deficient plants experienced a decrease in relative leaf water content, stomatal conductance, net CO2 assimilation rate, and water use efficiency compared to well-watered plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–449 · show in text ↑
e3

“resulted in severe growth retardation (75% decrease in leaf area, and 64% and 56% decrease in aerial tissue and root dry matter, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–663 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced root dry matter by 56% in maize line KS140 compared with well-watered plants.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Material
line KS140e2
Organ / stage
V5 or V6 leaf stagee2
Treatment
withholding water for 10 dayse2
Outcome
root dry mattere3
Direction
decreasee3
Value
56%e3
Comparator
well-watered plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“inbred maize (Zea mays L.) line KS140 was subjected to drought stress by withholding water for 10 days at the V5 or V6 leaf stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–264 · show in text ↑
e1

“Water-deficient plants experienced a decrease in relative leaf water content, stomatal conductance, net CO2 assimilation rate, and water use efficiency compared to well-watered plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–449 · show in text ↑
e3

“resulted in severe growth retardation (75% decrease in leaf area, and 64% and 56% decrease in aerial tissue and root dry matter, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–663 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf chlorophyll content was unchanged under drought in maize line KS140.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Material
line KS140e2
Organ / stage
V5 or V6 leaf stagee2
Treatment
withholding water for 10 dayse2
Outcome
Leaf chlorophyll contente4
Direction
unchangede4
Comparator
well-watered plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“inbred maize (Zea mays L.) line KS140 was subjected to drought stress by withholding water for 10 days at the V5 or V6 leaf stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–264 · show in text ↑
e1

“Water-deficient plants experienced a decrease in relative leaf water content, stomatal conductance, net CO2 assimilation rate, and water use efficiency compared to well-watered plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–449 · show in text ↑
e4

“Leaf chlorophyll content was unchanged”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–703 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twenty-nine protein spots were differentially expressed between well-watered and water-deficient maize plants.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Material
line KS140e2
Organ / stage
V5 or V6 leaf stagee2
Treatment
withholding water for 10 dayse2
Outcome
protein spotse5
Direction
Differential expressione5
Value
29e5
Comparator
well-watered plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“inbred maize (Zea mays L.) line KS140 was subjected to drought stress by withholding water for 10 days at the V5 or V6 leaf stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–264 · show in text ↑
e1

“Water-deficient plants experienced a decrease in relative leaf water content, stomatal conductance, net CO2 assimilation rate, and water use efficiency compared to well-watered plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–449 · show in text ↑
e5

“Differential expression was observed for 29 protein spots, and these were identified using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–945 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Of the differentially expressed protein spots, 24 were up-regulated in water-deficient maize plants.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Material
line KS140e2
Organ / stage
V5 or V6 leaf stagee2
Treatment
withholding water for 10 dayse2
Outcome
protein spotse6
Direction
increaseinferrede6
Value
24e6
Comparator
well-watered plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“inbred maize (Zea mays L.) line KS140 was subjected to drought stress by withholding water for 10 days at the V5 or V6 leaf stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–264 · show in text ↑
e1

“Water-deficient plants experienced a decrease in relative leaf water content, stomatal conductance, net CO2 assimilation rate, and water use efficiency compared to well-watered plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–449 · show in text ↑
e6

“Of the 29 differentially expressed proteins, 24 and 5 protein spots were up- and down-regulated in water-deficient plants, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1255 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Of the differentially expressed protein spots, 5 were down-regulated in water-deficient maize plants.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Material
line KS140e2
Organ / stage
V5 or V6 leaf stagee2
Treatment
withholding water for 10 dayse2
Outcome
protein spotse6
Direction
decreaseinferrede6
Value
5e6
Comparator
well-watered plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“inbred maize (Zea mays L.) line KS140 was subjected to drought stress by withholding water for 10 days at the V5 or V6 leaf stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–264 · show in text ↑
e1

“Water-deficient plants experienced a decrease in relative leaf water content, stomatal conductance, net CO2 assimilation rate, and water use efficiency compared to well-watered plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–449 · show in text ↑
e6

“Of the 29 differentially expressed proteins, 24 and 5 protein spots were up- and down-regulated in water-deficient plants, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1255 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

34% of the identified proteins were involved in metabolism in drought-treated maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Material
line KS140e2
Organ / stage
V5 or V6 leaf stagee2
Treatment
withholding water for 10 dayse2
Outcome
involved in metabolisme7
Value
34%e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“inbred maize (Zea mays L.) line KS140 was subjected to drought stress by withholding water for 10 days at the V5 or V6 leaf stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–264 · show in text ↑
e7

“Of these proteins, 34% were involved in metabolism, 24% in response to stress, 14% in photosynthesis, 7% in protein modification, and 14% were proteins of unknown function”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1118 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

24% of the identified proteins were involved in response to stress in drought-treated maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Material
line KS140e2
Organ / stage
V5 or V6 leaf stagee2
Treatment
withholding water for 10 dayse2
Outcome
in response to stresse7
Value
24%e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“inbred maize (Zea mays L.) line KS140 was subjected to drought stress by withholding water for 10 days at the V5 or V6 leaf stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–264 · show in text ↑
e7

“Of these proteins, 34% were involved in metabolism, 24% in response to stress, 14% in photosynthesis, 7% in protein modification, and 14% were proteins of unknown function”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1118 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

14% of the identified proteins were involved in photosynthesis in drought-treated maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Material
line KS140e2
Organ / stage
V5 or V6 leaf stagee2
Treatment
withholding water for 10 dayse2
Outcome
in photosynthesise7
Value
14%e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“inbred maize (Zea mays L.) line KS140 was subjected to drought stress by withholding water for 10 days at the V5 or V6 leaf stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–264 · show in text ↑
e7

“Of these proteins, 34% were involved in metabolism, 24% in response to stress, 14% in photosynthesis, 7% in protein modification, and 14% were proteins of unknown function”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1118 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

7% of the identified proteins were involved in protein modification in drought-treated maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Material
line KS140e2
Organ / stage
V5 or V6 leaf stagee2
Treatment
withholding water for 10 dayse2
Outcome
in protein modificatione7
Value
7%e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“inbred maize (Zea mays L.) line KS140 was subjected to drought stress by withholding water for 10 days at the V5 or V6 leaf stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–264 · show in text ↑
e7

“Of these proteins, 34% were involved in metabolism, 24% in response to stress, 14% in photosynthesis, 7% in protein modification, and 14% were proteins of unknown function”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1118 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

14% of the identified proteins were of unknown function in drought-treated maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Material
line KS140e2
Organ / stage
V5 or V6 leaf stagee2
Treatment
withholding water for 10 dayse2
Outcome
proteins of unknown functione7
Value
14%e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“inbred maize (Zea mays L.) line KS140 was subjected to drought stress by withholding water for 10 days at the V5 or V6 leaf stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–264 · show in text ↑
e7

“Of these proteins, 34% were involved in metabolism, 24% in response to stress, 14% in photosynthesis, 7% in protein modification, and 14% were proteins of unknown function”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two pathogenesis-related proteins, an abscisic stress-ripening protein and heat shock protein 1 were expressed only under drought in maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Material
line KS140e2
Organ / stage
V5 or V6 leaf stagee2
Treatment
drought conditionse0
Gene
pathogenesis-related proteinse0
Outcome
expressede0
Qualifier
an abscisic stress-ripening protein and heat shock protein 1e0
Comparator
well-watered plantse1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“inbred maize (Zea mays L.) line KS140 was subjected to drought stress by withholding water for 10 days at the V5 or V6 leaf stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–264 · show in text ↑
e1

“Water-deficient plants experienced a decrease in relative leaf water content, stomatal conductance, net CO2 assimilation rate, and water use efficiency compared to well-watered plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–449 · show in text ↑
e0

“Two pathogenesis-related proteins, an abscisic stress-ripening protein and heat shock protein 1, were expressed only under drought conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1398 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

85 papers: 10 positive, 75 negative or no effect

74 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

81 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

121 papers: 13 positive, 108 negative or no effect

107 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

117 papers more in this group

See all 121 papers →

drought · physiology: water · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

155 papers: 39 positive, 116 negative or no effect

115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 39 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

151 papers more in this group

See all 155 papers →

drought · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

385 papers: 77 positive, 308 negative or no effect

307 papers in the same direction as this paper · 77 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

381 papers more in this group

See all 385 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.