Paper · 2020 · Photosynthetica

The quantitative proteomic analysis provides insight into the effects of drought stress in maize

H.-J. LI; Y.-F. WANG; C.-F. ZHAO; et al.

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
17
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Drought stress is one of the major environmental factors that limit maize yield in agriculture. However, few studies have analyzed how proteins respond to different degrees of drought at the proteome level. In this study, physiological characteristics and comparative tandem mass tag proteomics were used to analyze the responses of maize seedlings to mild and severe drought stresses in pot experiments. A total of 104 and 464 proteins were differentially expressed under mild and severe drought, respectively, but only 30 proteins were overlapped. Further Gene Ontology enrichment analysis showed maize can adapt to mild drought by activating antioxidant system and photorespiration. Under severe drought stress, photosystem and protein synthesis-related proteins were downregulated indicating severe drought damaged the photosynthetic apparatus. The plant biomass under drought stress was also reduced sharply compared to control. Taken together, our study provides insights into proteomic information of maize leaves under increasing drought stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mild drought stress changed 104 maize proteins in abundance.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
mild droughte2
Outcome
differentially expressede1
Value
104e1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“The quantitative proteomic analysis provides insight into the effects of drought stress in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–96 · show in text ↑
e1

“A total of 104 and 464 proteins were differentially expressed under mild and severe drought, respectively, but only 30 proteins were overlapped”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 405–548 · show in text ↑
e2

“maize can adapt to mild drought by activating antioxidant system and photorespiration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–684 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Severe drought stress changed 464 maize proteins in abundance.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
severe droughte1
Outcome
differentially expressede1
Value
464e1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“The quantitative proteomic analysis provides insight into the effects of drought stress in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–96 · show in text ↑
e1

“A total of 104 and 464 proteins were differentially expressed under mild and severe drought, respectively, but only 30 proteins were overlapped”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 405–548 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only 30 proteins were shared between the mild and severe drought responses.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
proteins were overlappede1
Value
30e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“The quantitative proteomic analysis provides insight into the effects of drought stress in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–96 · show in text ↑
e1

“A total of 104 and 464 proteins were differentially expressed under mild and severe drought, respectively, but only 30 proteins were overlapped”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 405–548 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize adapts to mild drought by activating the antioxidant system and photorespiration, according to GO enrichment.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
mild droughte2
Outcome
adapt to mild droughte2
Qualifier
activating antioxidant system and photorespiratione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“The quantitative proteomic analysis provides insight into the effects of drought stress in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–96 · show in text ↑
e2

“maize can adapt to mild drought by activating antioxidant system and photorespiration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–684 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under severe drought stress, photosystem and protein synthesis-related proteins were downregulated in maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
severe drought stresse3
Outcome
photosystem and protein synthesis-related proteinse3
Direction
downregulatede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“The quantitative proteomic analysis provides insight into the effects of drought stress in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–96 · show in text ↑
e3

“Under severe drought stress, photosystem and protein synthesis-related proteins were downregulated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–784 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Severe drought is interpreted as damaging the photosynthetic apparatus of maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
severe droughte4
Outcome
photosynthetic apparatuse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“The quantitative proteomic analysis provides insight into the effects of drought stress in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–96 · show in text ↑
e4

“severe drought damaged the photosynthetic apparatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–847 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant biomass of maize under drought stress was reduced sharply compared to control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
drought stresse5
Outcome
plant biomasse5
Direction
reducede5
Comparator
controle5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“The quantitative proteomic analysis provides insight into the effects of drought stress in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–96 · show in text ↑
e5

“The plant biomass under drought stress was also reduced sharply compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–932 · show in text ↑

drought · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

33 papers: 7 positive, 26 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

drought · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

385 papers: 77 positive, 308 negative or no effect

307 papers in the same direction as this paper · 77 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

381 papers more in this group

See all 385 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.