“Panicum maximum Jacq. using a temperature‐free air‐controlled enhancement (T‐FACE) system. The wS and eT treatments showed no effects on photosystem II photochemistry. However, wS under ambient temperature decreased net photosynthesis rate ( A ), stomatal conductance ( g s ) and maximum rate of carboxylation of Rubisco ( V cmax ), leading to a reduced starch content in leaves. A 16% reduction in leaf dry mass (LDM) a…” Show full quote
“Panicum maximum Jacq. using a temperature‐free air‐controlled enhancement (T‐FACE) system. The wS and eT treatments showed no effects on photosystem II photochemistry. However, wS under ambient temperature decreased net photosynthesis rate ( A ), stomatal conductance ( g s ) and maximum rate of carboxylation of Rubisco ( V cmax ), leading to a reduced starch content in leaves. A 16% reduction in leaf dry mass (LDM) a…” Show full quote
“Panicum maximum Jacq. using a temperature‐free air‐controlled enhancement (T‐FACE) system. The wS and eT treatments showed no effects on photosystem II photochemistry. However, wS under ambient temperature decreased net photosynthesis rate ( A ), stomatal conductance ( g s ) and maximum rate of carboxylation of Rubisco ( V cmax ), leading to a reduced starch content in leaves. A 16% reduction in leaf dry mass (LDM) a…” Show full quote
“The combined wSeT treatment reduced A , g s , V cmax and the forage quality”
e1
“Panicum maximum Jacq. using a temperature‐free air‐controlled enhancement (T‐FACE) system. The wS and eT treatments showed no effects on photosystem II photochemistry. However, wS under ambient temperature decreased net photosynthesis rate ( A ), stomatal conductance ( g s ) and maximum rate of carboxylation of Rubisco ( V cmax ), leading to a reduced starch content in leaves. A 16% reduction in leaf dry mass (LDM) a…” Show full quote
“reduced the forage quality, increasing the lignin content and reducing starch, CP and digestibility”
e1
“Panicum maximum Jacq. using a temperature‐free air‐controlled enhancement (T‐FACE) system. The wS and eT treatments showed no effects on photosystem II photochemistry. However, wS under ambient temperature decreased net photosynthesis rate ( A ), stomatal conductance ( g s ) and maximum rate of carboxylation of Rubisco ( V cmax ), leading to a reduced starch content in leaves. A 16% reduction in leaf dry mass (LDM) a…” Show full quote
“The combined wSeT treatment reduced A , g s , V cmax and the forage quality”
e1
“Panicum maximum Jacq. using a temperature‐free air‐controlled enhancement (T‐FACE) system. The wS and eT treatments showed no effects on photosystem II photochemistry. However, wS under ambient temperature decreased net photosynthesis rate ( A ), stomatal conductance ( g s ) and maximum rate of carboxylation of Rubisco ( V cmax ), leading to a reduced starch content in leaves. A 16% reduction in leaf dry mass (LDM) a…” Show full quote
“reduction in forage quality by increasing fibers, reducing crude protein (CP) and decreasing the IVDMD was also observed by effect of wS”
e1
“Panicum maximum Jacq. using a temperature‐free air‐controlled enhancement (T‐FACE) system. The wS and eT treatments showed no effects on photosystem II photochemistry. However, wS under ambient temperature decreased net photosynthesis rate ( A ), stomatal conductance ( g s ) and maximum rate of carboxylation of Rubisco ( V cmax ), leading to a reduced starch content in leaves. A 16% reduction in leaf dry mass (LDM) a…” Show full quote
“reduction in forage quality by increasing fibers, reducing crude protein (CP) and decreasing the IVDMD was also observed by effect of wS”
e1
“Panicum maximum Jacq. using a temperature‐free air‐controlled enhancement (T‐FACE) system. The wS and eT treatments showed no effects on photosystem II photochemistry. However, wS under ambient temperature decreased net photosynthesis rate ( A ), stomatal conductance ( g s ) and maximum rate of carboxylation of Rubisco ( V cmax ), leading to a reduced starch content in leaves. A 16% reduction in leaf dry mass (LDM) a…” Show full quote
“reduction in forage quality by increasing fibers, reducing crude protein (CP) and decreasing the IVDMD was also observed by effect of wS”
e1
“Panicum maximum Jacq. using a temperature‐free air‐controlled enhancement (T‐FACE) system. The wS and eT treatments showed no effects on photosystem II photochemistry. However, wS under ambient temperature decreased net photosynthesis rate ( A ), stomatal conductance ( g s ) and maximum rate of carboxylation of Rubisco ( V cmax ), leading to a reduced starch content in leaves. A 16% reduction in leaf dry mass (LDM) a…” Show full quote
“the lignin content in leaves increased by 43, 28 and 17% in wS , eT and wSeT , respectively”
e1
“Panicum maximum Jacq. using a temperature‐free air‐controlled enhancement (T‐FACE) system. The wS and eT treatments showed no effects on photosystem II photochemistry. However, wS under ambient temperature decreased net photosynthesis rate ( A ), stomatal conductance ( g s ) and maximum rate of carboxylation of Rubisco ( V cmax ), leading to a reduced starch content in leaves. A 16% reduction in leaf dry mass (LDM) a…” Show full quote
Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.