View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
At N levels below 51 kg N ha−1, inorganic and green manure N utilization were similar in 1984.
Outcomeinorganic N utilization e0 Comparatorgreen manure N utilization e0 Verbatim
e0 “At N levels < 51 kg N ha −1 , inorganic N utilization was inferior to green manure N utilization in 1983 but similar in 1984. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1095 e1 “rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 191–195 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The maximum N utilization from fertilizer for dry matter did not correspond to the maximum N utilization by pods.
Outcomemaximum N utilization by pods e5 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
t0 “Phaseolus vulgaris ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–95 e5 “The maximum N utilization from fertilizer to produce dry matter did not correspond to maximum N utilization by pods ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–534 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation had little effect on N utilization efficiency.
OutcomeN utilization efficiency e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Irrigation had little effect on N utilization efficiency ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–954 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Rice N- utilization rates did not differ significantly between two N-fertilization levels by the difference method.
Treatment2 N-fertilization levels e0 OutcomeN-utilization rates e0 Directionno significant difference e0 Comparator2 N-fertilization levels e0 Verbatim
e0 “the N- utilization rates of the 2 N-fertilization levels had no significant difference ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–418 t0 “Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–120 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Further doses of N fertilizer did not increase wheat N utilization
Treatmentfurther doses of N fertilizer e1 Outcomewheat N utilization e1 Directiondid not increase e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “durum wheat cultivars in Southern Italy ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–500 e1 “indicating that further doses of N fertilizer did not increase wheat N utilization ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1663–1745 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
There were no N source effects on grain protein concentration or N utilization efficiencies.
Outcomegrain protein concentration or N utilization efficiencies e1 Directionno_change inferred e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Triticum aestivum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–68 e1 “There were no N source effects on grain protein concentration or N utilization efficiencies ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1367 Other claims from this paper (13) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
N utilization did not vary among emergence classes.
Materialemergence classes e0 Directionabsence of variations e0 Verbatim
e0 “The absence of variations in N utilization across emergence classes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1325 t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–31 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
N and K utilization efficiency did not differ significantly among cultivars.
Outcomeutilization efficiency of N and K e0 Directionno significant differences e0 Verbatim
e0 “utilization efficiency of N and Kamong cultivars have no significant differences ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1835–1915 t0 “garlic cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–100 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Ammonium sulfate and urea did not differ significantly in N utilization by the crop.
TreatmentAmmonium sulfate e2 OutcomeN utilization by the crop e2 Directionno_change inferred e2 Verbatim
t0 “Utilization of Labelled Urea and Ammonium Sulfate by Lowland Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–65 e2 “Ammonium sulfate and urea did not differ significantly in N utilization by the crop ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–874 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen utilization efficiency stayed almost the same with increased nitrogen application.
Treatmentincreased N application e0 OutcomeN utilization efficiency e0 Directionalmost the same e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “With increased N application, N uptake efficiency and N use efficiency decreased significantly, whereas N utilization efficiency almost the same. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–637 t0 “maize hybrids ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–67 Other claims from this paper (9) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.