Refine ·

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Clear filters
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungal growth direction did not affect carbon transfer direction.

Taxon
funguse0
Interactor
funguse0symbiont
Outcome
direction of transfere0
Direction
did not affecte0

Verbatim

e0

“The direction of growth of the fungus did not affect the direction of transfer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1526–1604

Title

Carbon transfer between plants and its control in networks of arbuscular mycorrhizas

A. H. Fitter; J. D. Graves; N. K. Watkins; et al. Functional Ecology 1998. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2435.1998.00206.x

Other claims from this paper (6)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Circular plantings showed no lodging difference by row direction.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
row directiont1
Outcome
lodging differencese0
Direction
did not occure0
Setting
circular plantingse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“in the circular plantings, lodging differences did not occur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–642
t0

“Sunflowers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–37
t1

“Row Direction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–23

Title

Effect of Row Direction on Sunflowers1

R. G. Robinson Agronomy Journal 1975. doi:10.2134/agronj1975.00021962006700010027x

Other claims from this paper (4)
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pitted morningglory had no significant direction of halosulfuron movement.

Taxon
pitted morningglorye0
Outcome
direction of movemente0
Direction
No significant directione0

Verbatim

e0

“No significant direction of movement was observed for pitted morningglory.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–969

Title

Absorption, Translocation, and Metabolism of Halosulfuron in Cucumber, Summer Squash, and Selected Weeds

Thierry. E. Besançon; Katherine M. Jennings; Wesley J. Everman Weed Science 2017. doi:10.1017/wsc.2017.15

Other claims from this paper (12)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield did not differ significantly by sowing direction.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
Direction of sowinge0
Outcome
Direction of sowinge0
Direction
did not differe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Direction of sowing did not differ significantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 291–340
t0

“Effect of plant spacing and direction of sowing on growth and yield of rainfed Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–111

Title

Effect of plant spacing and direction of sowing on growth and yield of rainfed Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)

SURAJ BHAN; S. K. UTTAM; U. D. AWASTHI Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v40i4.3855

Other claims from this paper (2)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Error of measuring total leaf area from the horizontal direction was not much different from error of vertical-direction measurement.

Taxon
citrusCitruse1
Outcome
error of measuring the total leaf areae4
Comparator
error of measuring from vertical directione4

Verbatim

e1

“LAI of citrus trees was measured from the horizontal direction,the total leaf area was calculated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–414
e4

“Besides the error of measuring the total leaf area was not much different with the error of measuring from vertical direction by using the system or WinSCANOPY Canopy analysis system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–958

Title

LAI measurement from horizontal direction for precision spraying

WU Wei-bi Huazhong Nongye Daxue xuebao 2015

Other claims from this paper (3)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing direction had little effect on barley height.

Treatment
direction of sowinge0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
no much effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“There was no much effect of direction of sowing on plant height of barley genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–572

Title

Influence of direction of sowing on growth and yield of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)

Naresh Kumar; Ram Niwas; M. L. Khichar; et al. Crop Research 2012

Other claims from this paper (6)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Row direction did not change achene yield, weight, size, or oil percentage.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
Row directione0
Outcome
achene yield, weight, size, nor oil percentagee0
Direction
did not influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Row direction did not influence achene yield, weight, size, nor oil percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–500
t0

“Sunflowers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–37

Title

Effect of Row Direction on Sunflowers1

R. G. Robinson Agronomy Journal 1975. doi:10.2134/agronj1975.00021962006700010027x

Other claims from this paper (4)
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wind direction did not influence herbicide activity.

Outcome
herbicide activitye0
Direction
did not influencee0
Setting
wind directione0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“wind direction and dew at spray time did not influence herbicide activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1075

Title

Factors Influencing Commercial Aerial Applications of 2,4,5-T

B. J. Eaton; H. M. Elwell; P. W. Santelmann Weed Science 1970. doi:10.1017/s0043174500077304

Other claims from this paper (12)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Row direction did not consistently affect barley yield in either row spacing.

Treatment
Row directione3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
did not consistently affecte3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e3

“Row direction did not consistently affect the yield of barley in either spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–459
t0

“YIELDS OF BARLEY AND OATS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–59

Title

EFFECT OF DIRECTION OF SEEDING ON YIELDS OF BARLEY AND OATS

H. M. Austenson; E. N. Larter Canadian Journal of Plant Science 1969. doi:10.4141/cjps69-069

Other claims from this paper (5)
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

There was no correlation between crown root diameter and growing direction in rice.

Taxon
rice plantsOryza sativae0
Treatment
diametere6
Outcome
growing direction of the crown rootse6
Direction
no correlatione6

Verbatim

e0

“The direction of the crown root growth of rice plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–53
e6

“There was generally no correlation between the diameter and the growing direction of the crown roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2126–2226

Title

On the Direction of the Crown Root Growth of Rice Plants

Shin-ichiro KAWATA; Manabu KATANO Japanese Journal of Crop Science 1976. doi:10.1626/jcs.45.471

Other claims from this paper (4)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.