View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The tested herbicides did not inhibit germination, growth parameters or dry fodder yield in residual fodder sorghum.
TreatmentAll the herbicides tried e0 Outcomegermination, growth parameters and dry fodder yield e0 Directiondid not show any inhibitory effect e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “All the herbicides tried did not show any inhibitory effect on germination, growth parameters and dry fodder yield of residual crop of fodder sorghum. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–1003 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Sowing method did not significantly affect dry fodder yield of lucerne.
Treatmentsowing methods e1 Outcomedry fodder yield e1 Directiondid not differ e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “A field experiment on lucerne ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–29 e1 “The dry fodder yield and content arid uptake of nutrients did not differ significantly due to sowing methods ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–867 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
There was no significant difference between the 60 and 90 kg ha−1 phosphorus levels for green fodder and dry matter yield .
Treatmentthese two levels of phosphorus e5 Outcomegreen fodder and dry matter yield e5 Directionno significant difference e5 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Effect of Different Levels of Phosphorus on Yield and Quality of Fodder Ricebean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 e5 “There was no significant difference between these two levels of phosphorus for green fodder and dry matter yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–836 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Green and dry fodder yield s were similar between herbicide programs.
TaxonBajra Napier Hybrid t0 Treatmentoxadiargyl PE fb 2,4-D POE e0 Outcomegreen fodder (GF) and dry fodder (DF) yield e0 Comparatoroxadiargyl PE e0 Verbatim
t0 “Bajra Napier Hybrid ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–76 e0 “A similar green fodder (GF) and dry fodder (DF) yield was recorded in oxadiargyl PE and oxadiargyl PE fb 2,4-D POE. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1176 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
No hybrids showed significant positive standard heterosis for dry fodder yield over Kaveri super boss.
Outcomedry fodder yield per hectare e0 ComparatorKaveri super boss e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “none of hybrids over Kaveri super boss and 86 M 38 exhibited significant positive standard heterosis for dry fodder yield per hectare. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–811 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
No hybrids showed significant positive standard heterosis for dry fodder yield over 86 M 38.
Outcomedry fodder yield per hectare e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “none of hybrids over Kaveri super boss and 86 M 38 exhibited significant positive standard heterosis for dry fodder yield per hectare. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–811 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Dry fodder yield at 9.5 kg seed/ha Sugargraze was statistically at par with 7.5 kg seed/ha Sugargraze.
Treatmentsowing of Sugargraze by 9.5 kg seed/ha e1 Outcomedry fodder yield e0 Comparatorsowing of Sugargraze by 7.5 kg seed/ha e0 Verbatim
t0 “Hybrid Fodder Sorghum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–76 e0 “However, it was found at par with sowing of Sugargraze by 7.5 kg seed/ha green fodder yield (896 q/ha) and dry fodder yield (242 q/ha). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–503 e1 “green fodder yield (907 q/ha) and dry fodder yield (245 q/ha) were observed with sowing of Sugargraze by 9.5 kg seed/ha ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 142–261 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Sugargraze sown at 9.5 kg seed/ha gave dry fodder yield at par with sowing at 7.5 kg seed/ha.
Treatmentsowing of sugargraze 9.5 kg seed/ha e2 Outcomedry fodder yield e3 Comparatorsowing of sugargraze by 7.5 kg seed/ha e3 SettingAgricultural Research Station Ummedganj, Kota (Rajasthan) e1 Verbatim
t0 “Hybrid Fodder Sorghum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–36 e1 “A field experiment was conducted during two consecutive years from 2017 and 2018at Agricultural Research Station Ummedganj, Kota (Rajasthan) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–140 e2 “Pooled data of two years gave significantly higher green fodder yield (898 q/ha) and dry fodder yield (241 q/ha) were observed by sowing of sugargraze 9.5 kg seed/ha over local chari sowing by 10.0 kg seed/ha green fodder yield (659 q/ha) and dry fodder yield (166 q/ha) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–637 e3 “However, it was found at par with sowing of sugargraze by 7.5 kg seed/ha green fodder yield (887 q/ha) and dry fodder yield (238 q/ha) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–773 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Oat sole was at par with oat + vetch 4:1 for green fodder yield and dry matter accumulation
Outcomegreen fodder yield and dry matter accumulation e2 Comparatoroat + vetch 4:1 e2 Verbatim
e2 “The green fodder yield and dry matter accumulation of oat was significantly higher under oat sole than oat + vetch (2:1) and oat + vetch (1:1), however was at par to oat + vetch 4:1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–462 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Rabi dry matter yield was comparable at 50 and 75 mm CPE.
Outcomedry matter yield e0 Comparator75 mm CPE levels e0 Verbatim
e0 “dry matter yield was at par at 50 and 75 mm CPE levels ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1263 t0 “fodder ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 Other claims from this paper (19) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.