View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Variation between packsheds with water blasters was as great as variation between packsheds without them.
Outcomevariability between packsheds with water blasters installed e1 Comparatorpacksheds without water blasters e1 Verbatim
e0 “surface of the fruit ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 216–236 e1 “the variability between packsheds with water blasters installed was as great as the variability between packsheds without water blasters ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–839 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource author interpretation original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Small instantaneous fields of view offered no great advantage over large ones for remote sensing barley crop temperature.
Outcomeremote sensing of crop temperature e0 Directionno great advantage e0 Verbatim
e0 “There appears to be no great advantage in utilizing a small ifov instead of a large one for remote sensing of crop temperature. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–468 e1 “commercial barley field ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 61–84 Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
At least one transgenic potato line showed no morphological variability relative to the unmodified control.
Materialtransgenic lines e0 Treatmenttransgenic lines e0 Outcomemorphological variability e0 Directionno morphological variability e0 Comparatorunmodified control line e0 Verbatim
e0 “at least one of the transgenic lines studied has great potential for further study, bearing no morphological variability with respect to the unmodified control line. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–701 t0 “potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–46 Other claims from this paper (1) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
First harvest IVDMD showed no significant variability among RS lines (H = 0.26).
Taxonintergeneric wheatgrass hybrids e0 Outcomefirst harvest IVDMD e2 Verbatim
e0 “evaluate intergeneric wheatgrass hybrids for their potential as range and pasture grasses ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 32–121 e2 “except for first harvest IVDMD ( H = 0.26) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–667 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Biochar did not give significant differences in absolute yields between the treatments, owing to large variability between farms.
Directionno_change inferred e1 Comparatorthe treatments e1 Verbatim
e1 “However, due to a great variability between farms there were no significant differences in absolute yields between the treatments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1120 e2 “we studied the effects of biochar made of maize cobs ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–247 e3 “crop yield of maize ( Zea mays ) and groundnuts ( Arachis hypogaea ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 363–431 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect Biochar addition gave a consistent positive response in crop yield at all sites. Intervention effect In the sandy soils at Mongu, relative grain yield of maize with biochar at recommended fertilizer rates was significantly increased (232 ± 60%) relative to the same fertilizer rate without biochar. Intervention effect In the sandy soils at Mongu, relative stover yield of maize with biochar at half the recommended fertilizer rate was significantly increased (128 ± 6%) relative to the same fertilizer rate without biochar. Intervention effect Biochar significantly increased concentrations of K and P in maize stover. Intervention effect In situ soil nutrient supply rates were highly spatially variable with no consistent effects of the treatments in the three regions. Intervention effect Biochar significantly increased the fraction of plant-available water in all three soils. Intervention effect In Mongu, biochar at 10% increased plant-available water by a factor of 2.5, from 4.5% to 11.2%. Intervention effect In Kaoma, biochar at 10% increased plant-available water by a factor of 1.2, from 14.7% to 18.2%. Intervention effect In Mkushi, biochar at 10% increased plant-available water by a factor of 1.2, from 18.2% to 22.7%. Intervention effect Cation exchange capacity, pH and exchangeable K significantly increased with 10% biochar in all three regions. Intervention effect Biochar at 10% (w:w) was followed by an increase in base saturation. Intervention effect Biochar at 10% (w:w) was followed by a decrease of available Al 3+. Mechanism The positive effect of biochar with conservation farming on crop growth is mainly caused by increases in plant-available water and decreased available Al, according to the authors. Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Total dry mass of root nodules doubled under elevated CO2, but the effect was not significant.
Organ / stageroot nodules e7 Treatmentelevated [CO2] e7 OutcomeTotal dry mass of root nodules e7 Qualifierbecause of the great variability of root nodule formation e7 Comparatorambient (350 ppm) e1 Verbatim
e0 “1-year-old Robinia pseudoacacia ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–187 e1 “Seedlings were grown for 16 weeks in ambient (350 ppm) or elevated [CO2] (700 ppm) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 258–340 e7 “Total dry mass of root nodules doubled in response to elevated [CO2], but this effect was not significant because of the great variability of root nodule formation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1217 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
IBA treatment of Eugenia uniflora stem cuttings did not increase rooting.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Eugenia uniflora is a species that presents great phytochemical variability ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–75 e5 “The treatment of the stem cuttings with IBA did not result in increase of rooting ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1308 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Rejuvenated and non-rejuvenated Eugenia uniflora cuttings showed no anatomical changes.
Outcomeanatomical changes e4 Directionno_change inferred e4 Comparatornon-rejuvenated plant material e4 Verbatim
e0 “Eugenia uniflora is a species that presents great phytochemical variability ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–75 e4 “No anatomical changes were observed between cuttings from rejuvenated and non-rejuvenated plant material ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1059 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The Caulorrhizae Section showed the same rooting pattern as the Erectoides Section.
MaterialCaulorrhizae Section e3 ComparatorErectoides Section e3 Verbatim
e0 “Leaf rooting observed in the wild species confirmed the great genetic variability typical of the Arachis genus ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–740 e3 “The Caulorrhizae Section showed the same pattern observed in the Erectoides Section ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–966 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Concentrations of individual aflatoxins in the 2007 dried figs were not significantly different from those reported in previous studies.
OutcomeConcentrations of individual aflatoxins e1 Directionnot significantly different e1 Comparatorprevious studies e1 Verbatim
e0 “Dried figs (4917 samples) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–25 e1 “Concentrations of individual aflatoxins exhibited great variability among the samples but were not significantly different from those reported in previous studies ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1505 Other claims from this paper (10) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.