View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
External sodium concentration did not alter the electrical potential difference .
Outcomeelectrical potential difference e0 Verbatim
e0 “An electrical potential difference between the exuding sap and the external solution of approximately 30 mV was observed. It was unaffected by the external sodium concentration. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–667 t0 “Sunflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–40 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The water- potential difference remained constant during axis growth.
Outcomedifference in water potential e1 Directionremained constant e1 Verbatim
e0 “Grand Rapids lettuce (Lac tuca sativa L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–56 e1 “the difference in water potential remained constant during the growth of the axes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–693 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Upper and lower pulvinar cells had no significant difference in membrane potential .
Outcomemembrane potential e0 Directionno significant difference e0 Comparatorupper and lower pulvinar cells e0 Verbatim
e0 “no significant difference in membrane potential could be detected between upper and lower pulvinar cells ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–683 t0 “Mimosa pudica ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–55 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
P. tonkinense showed no obvious predawn versus midday water potential difference under either condition.
Outcomeno obvious difference between the predawn water potential and the midday water potential e0 Directionno obvious difference e0 Verbatim
e0 “Under both rain-sheltered and natural conditions, there was no obvious difference between the predawn water potential and the midday water potential of P. tonkinense ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1777–1942 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Light showed no obvious difference in embryo germination potential .
Outcomegermination potential e0 Directionno obvious difference e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Ferula sinkiangensis K.M.Shen ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–66 e0 “Light had no obvious difference on the germination potential (p=0.334) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–407 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Under normal water potential melatonin treatment produced no discernible difference .
Treatmentmelatonin administration e0 Outcomeno discernible difference e0 Directionno discernible difference e0 Qualifierunder normal water potential e0 Comparatorno melatonin treatment e0 Verbatim
t0 “Carex breviculmis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–67 e0 “under normal water potential , there was no discernible difference between melatonin administration and no melatonin treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–749 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Local and improved A. macrum cultivars had little difference in yield potential .
Materiallocal and improved cultivars e0 Directionlittle difference e0 Verbatim
e0 “There was little difference in yield potential between local and improved cultivars of A. macrum . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–310 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
At the lowest water potential almost all seeds persisted, with no life history difference .
Treatmentlowest water potential treatment e0 Qualifieralmost all seeds persisted e0 Verbatim
e0 “there was no difference at the lowest water potential treatment because almost all seeds persisted ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–957 t0 “Mimulus guttatus ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–61 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Ethylene glycol had little effect on potential difference .
TreatmentEthylene glycol e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Ethylene glycol, a permeant osmoticum, had little effect on PD ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–921 e1 “Pod walls of broadbean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–22 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Global warming potential showed no net difference among the three rice systems.
TreatmentFR, FRCC and MIRI e0 Outcomeglobal warming potential e0 Directionno net difference e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “there was no net difference in global warming potential among FR, FRCC and MIRI ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1264 e1 “rice (Oryza sativa ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–130 Other claims from this paper (8) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.