Search claims · PlantClaims

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

These combinations did not significantly decrease yield.

Taxon: grapet0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“without a significant decrease in yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1025

t0
“Isabella grape variety”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–510

Title

Impact of combination application of herbicides and mineral fertilizers on the chemical composition of must and wine

Madina B. Khokonova Izvestiya of Kabardino-Balkarian State Agrarian University named after V M Kokov 2022. doi:10.55196/2411-3492-2022-3-37-26-30

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Combined herbicides and fertilizers generally left must sugar at control level.
Intervention effect Nitrate fertilizers with simazine increased wort sugar.
Intervention effect Nitrate fertilizers with atrazine increased wort sugar.
Observation Wort titratable acids did not differ significantly.
Intervention effect Atrazine plus NP slightly lowered wine titratable acids.
Intervention effect Atrazine plus NRK slightly lowered wine titratable acids.
Observation Coloring substances and total phenols tended to increase in all variants.
Observation Simazine with mineral fertilizers caused no sharp deviation in main must and wine components.
Observation Atrazine with mineral fertilizers caused no sharp deviation in main must and wine components.
Observation These herbicides and fertilizers did not negatively affect wine organoleptic properties.

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate formulation did not interact with yield decrease.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment: formulatione0
Outcome: formulation interaction with yield decreasee0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“There was not found any formulation interaction with yield decrease.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1245–1313

e1
“glyphosate-tolerant soybean”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–659

Title

Glyphosate Tolerant Soybean Response to Different Management Systems

Alfredo J. P. Albrecht; Leandro P. Albrecht; Arthur A. M. Barroso; et al. Journal of Agricultural Science 2017. doi:10.5539/jas.v10n1p204

Other claims from this paper (1)

Intervention effect Post-emergent glyphosate was associated with a season-dependent 5% soybean yield reduction without visible symptoms.

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fomesafen did not injure strawberry or decrease yield.

Taxon: strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Outcome: injure strawberry or decrease yielde2

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“provides PRE weed control in strawberry”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–150

e2
“Fomesafen did not injure strawberry or decrease yield.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–830

Title

Persistence and Movement of Fomesafen in Florida Strawberry Production

Thomas V. Reed; Nathan S. Boyd; P. Christopher Wilson; et al. Weed Science 2018. doi:10.1017/wsc.2018.48

Other claims from this paper (4)

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Simulated foliar damage alone did not decrease grain yield.

Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: did not decreasee0
Qualifier: foliar damage alonee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0
“foliar damage alone did not decrease grain yield but decreased straw yield.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–754

Title

Field evaluation and simulation of frost tolerance in Syrian durum wheat landraces

A. Elings; M.M. Nachit Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 1993. doi:10.18174/njas.v41i1.629

Other claims from this paper (8)

Observation January frosts caused under 5% apparent foliar damage.
Observation March frosts caused average foliar damage of 23%, ranging 3-65%.
Association Late frost tolerance appeared related to regional minimum winter temperatures.
Association Coastal landraces showed the highest frost sensitivity.
Intervention effect Fertilizer did not significantly affect foliar damage.
Observation Simulated foliar damage alone decreased straw yield.
Observation Simulated additional floret damage decreased grain yield.
Observation Simulated additional floret damage increased straw yield.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The evaluated herbicides did not decrease durum wheat yield.

Taxon: durum wheatTriticum turgidum subsp. durume0
Treatment: herbicides evaluatede0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: no decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“There was no decrease in durum wheat yield with the herbicides evaluated.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1294

Title

Sensitivity of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum) to various postemergence herbicides

Nader Soltani; Christy Shropshire; Peter H. Sikkema Agricultural Sciences 2011. doi:10.4236/as.2011.24058

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effect dichlorprop/2,4-D produced 0 to 2.4% visible injury in durum wheat.
Intervention effect dicamba/MCPA/mecoprop produced 0 to 6% visible injury in durum wheat.
Intervention effect clopyralid produced 0 to 0.4% visible injury in durum wheat.
Intervention effect bromoxynil/MCPA produced 0 to 1.4% visible injury in durum wheat.
Intervention effect pyrasulfotole/bromoxynil produced 0 to 3.5% visible injury in durum wheat.
Intervention effect thifensulfuron/tribenuron + MCPA amine produced 0 to 5% visible injury in durum wheat.
Intervention effect fluroxypyr + MCPA ester produced 0 to 2.6% visible injury in durum wheat.
Intervention effect tralkoxydim produced 0 to 5% visible injury in durum wheat.
Intervention effect fenoxaprop-pethyl/safener produced 0.4% to 8% visible injury in durum wheat.
Intervention effect dicamba/ MCPA/mecoprop decreased durum wheat height by as much as 5%.
Intervention effect pyrasulfotole/bromoxynil decreased durum wheat height by as much as 4%.
Intervention effect fenoxaprop-pethyl/safener decreased durum wheat height by as much as 6%.
Intervention effect Other evaluated herbicides did not affect durum wheat height.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

When soil water potential continued to decrease, no longer obvious decrease in yield was observed.

Taxon: RiceOryza sativat0
Treatment: SWP continued to be decreasede6
Outcome: yielde2
Direction: no longer obvious decreasee6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Yield and Quality of Rice”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–52

e2
“the yield of two cultivars was decreased significantly before heading stages,especially at panicle formation stage by lower SWP”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–558

e6
“but no longer obvious decrease was observed when SWP continued to be decreased”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–637

Title

Effect of Soil Moisture on Yield and Quality of Rice

Zheng Gui 2006

Other claims from this paper (7)

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 4M:6S ratio did not decrease subsequent wheat yield.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: did not decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“but it did not decrease yield of wheat.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1740–1779

Title

Row Ratios of Intercropping Maize and Soybean Can Affect Agronomic Efficiency of the System and Subsequent Wheat

Yitao Zhang; Jian Liu; Jizong Zhang; et al. PLoS ONE 2015. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0129245

Other claims from this paper (14)

Observation Maize–soybean intercropping was the optimal summer cropping system.
Intervention effect Maize–soybean intercropping improved yield, economy and land utilization relative to maize monoculture.
Intervention effect Maize–soybean intercropping reduced soil nitrate accumulation relative to maize monoculture.
Observation Maize–soybean intercropping improved the residual effect on subsequent wheat.
Observation Intercropping reduced nitrogen fertilizer use per unit area.
Observation Intercropping increased relative maize biomass.
Observation Border-row photosynthetic efficiency and nitrogen utilization were promoted during intercropping.
Observation Intercropping advantage emerged at tasseling after maize nitrogen topdressing.
Intervention effect The 4M:6S row ratio had the largest land equivalent ratio of 1.30.
Intervention effect The 4M:6S row ratio had the greatest crop nitrogen accumulation of 258 kg ha(-1).
Intervention effect The 4M:6S row ratio had the greatest economic benefit of 3,408 USD ha(-1).
Intervention effect The 4M:6S ratio lowered soil nitrate after maize harvest compared with maize monoculture.
Intervention effect The 4M:6S ratio lowered soil nitrate after subsequent wheat harvest compared with maize monoculture.
Recommendation The authors recommended alternating four maize rows with six soybean rows as the optimum ratio, subject to further multiyear confirmation.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield did not significantly decrease through the eight-day irrigation interval.

Taxon: RICEOryza sativat0
Treatment: 8We0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Comparator: continuous flooding (W)e1

Verbatim

e0
“without any significant decrease in yield up to 8W”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–955

t0
“RICE”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68

e1
“continuous flooding (W) without any significant decrease”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–937

Title

IRRIGATION REGIME AND POTASSIUM LEVELS EFFECTS ON YIELD OF SOME RICE GENOTYPES, WATER USE EFFICIENCY (WUE) AND ECONOMIC RETURNS

Howida El-Habet Journal of Plant Production 2014. doi:10.21608/jpp.2014.53654

Other claims from this paper (17)

Observation Giza179 had higher grain yield and yield attributes than GZ7112 under continuous flooding.
Intervention effect Twelve-day irrigation significantly reduced rice yield.
Intervention effect At 4W, Giza179 saved 10.36% and 8.37% irrigation water in 2012 and 2013.
Intervention effect At 4W, GZ7112 saved 10.50% and 10.36% irrigation water.
Intervention effect At 8W, Giza179 saved 17.81% and 23.66% water.
Intervention effect At 8W, GZ7112 saved 13.33% and 18.44% water.
Intervention effect At 12W, irrigation water savings were 23.91% and 27.90% across the two seasons.
Intervention effect At 12W, grain yield was reduced about 22.42% and 24.71% in 2012 and 2013.
Observation Giza179 yielded 9.70 t/ha across both seasons.
Observation GZ7112 yielded 9.33 t/ha across both seasons.
Observation Giza179 saved 20.73% water across both seasons.
Observation GZ7112 saved 15.88% water across both seasons.
Observation Giza179 water use efficiency was 0.90 kg/m3.
Observation GZ7112 water use efficiency was 0.81 kg/m3.
Observation With Giza179 at 8W, total water input was reported as 11260.88 and 10006.80 m3/ha.
Intervention effect Potassium application up to 108 K2O/ha significantly increased rice yield.
Intervention effect Potassium application up to 108 K2O/ha mitigated water stress and increased WUE and water savings.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nei2you 6 yield did not decrease significantly under light water stress.

Material: Nei2you 6e0
Treatment: light water stresse0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: did not decreasee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0
“yield of Nei2you 6 did not decrease significantly under light water stress”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 170–244

Title

Effects of soil moisture on the accumulation of rice dry matter and yield

Li Hua; Wang DongYin; Defeng Zhu Xi'nan nongye xuebao 2008

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Severe water stress reduced Nei2you 6 yield by 15.2%.
Intervention effect Yield of Ⅱyou 7954 increased under soil water stress.
Observation Nei2you 6 was more sensitive to soil water stress than Ⅱyou 7954.
Intervention effect Moderate water stress decreased Nei2you 6 dry matter accumulation by 22.0%.
Intervention effect Light water stress increased Ⅱyou 7954 dry matter accumulation by 8.4%.
Intervention effect Moderate water stress increased Ⅱyou 7954 dry matter accumulation by 4.7%.
Intervention effect Soil water stress lowered dry matter transmission to the panicle in Nei2you 6 relative to the check.
Intervention effect Soil water stress raised dry matter transmission to the panicle in Ⅱyou 7954 relative to the check.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Light water stress did not significantly decrease Nei2you6 yield.

Taxon: riceOryza sativat0
Material: Nei2you6e0
Treatment: light water stresse0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: didn't decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The results indicated that the yield of Nei2you6 didn't decrease significantly under light water stress”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–304

t0
“rice”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–63

Title

Effects of soil moisture on superficial roots and yield of rice

Li Hua; Zhang Yu-ping Ganhan diqu nongye yanjiu 2006

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Severe water stress reduced Nei2you6 yield by 15.2%.
Intervention effect Soil water stress increased yield of Ⅱyou7954.
Observation Nei2you6 was more sensitive to soil water stress than Ⅱyou7954.
Intervention effect Light water stress slightly promoted superficial root growth.
Intervention effect Severe water stress reduced superficial root dry weight of Nei2you6 by 10.5%~31.6%.
Intervention effect Severe water stress reduced superficial root dry weight of Ⅱyou7954 by 13%.
Intervention effect Soil water stress enhanced superficial root activity.
Intervention effect Root cutting at panicle initiation caused more yield reduction than at flowering.
Intervention effect Cutting roots at panicle initiation decreased grain number per panicle.
Intervention effect Cutting roots at flowering decreased spikelet fertility rate.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics