Search claims · PlantClaims

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn yield was slightly higher with EPP followed by PRE than with EPP alone.

Taxon: CornZea mays subsp. mayse0
Treatment: EPP fb PREe0
Outcome: Corn yieldse0
Direction: slightly highere0
Comparator: EPP alonee0

Verbatim

e0
“Corn yields were slightly higher with EPP fb PRE and PRE fb EPOST dicamba than with EPP alone.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1150

Title

Application Timing Affects Weed Control with Metolachlor Plus Atrazine in No-Till Corn (Zea mays)

William G. Johnson; Michael S. Defelice; Cheryl S. Holman Weed Technology 1997. doi:10.1017/s0890037x00042858

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Weed control at seven weeks was more variable with EPP than with EPP followed by PRE or PRE treatments.
Intervention effect Giant foxtail control was greatest when metolachlor was applied PRE.
Intervention effect Fall panicum control was greatest when metolachlor was applied PRE.
Intervention effect Velvetleaf control was greatest with atrazine or dicamba EPOST.
Intervention effect Common cocklebur control was greatest with atrazine or dicamba EPOST.
Intervention effect Velvetleaf control was generally below 80% with soil-applied herbicides.
Intervention effect Common cocklebur control was generally below 80% with soil-applied herbicides.
Intervention effect Common lambsquarters control exceeded 90% with all treatments including metolachlor, atrazine or dicamba regardless of timing.
Intervention effect Corn yield was slightly higher with PRE followed by EPOST dicamba than with EPP alone.
Recommendation The authors infer that applications nearer planting give less variable weed control and corn yield than applications more than 15 days EPP.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EPP–MPOST strategies controlled weeds less effectively than EPP acetochlor or atrazine followed by postemergence treatment.

Taxon: cornZea mays subsp. mayst0
Treatment: EPP–MPOST strategiese0
Outcome: weed controle0
Direction: lowere0
Comparator: strategies using acetochlor or atrazine EPP followed by a postemergence applicatione0

Verbatim

e0
“EPP–MPOST strategies generally provided lower weed control than strategies using acetochlor or atrazine EPP followed by a postemergence application”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1070

t0
“Corn”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–75

Title

Weed Management and Economic Returns in No-Tillage Herbicide-Resistant Corn (Zea mays)¹

KALEB B. HELLWIG; WILLIAM G. JOHNSON; RAYMOND E. MASSEY Weed Technology 2003. doi:10.1614/0890-037x(2003)017[0239:wmaeri]2.0.co;2

Other claims from this paper (14)

Observation Herbicide injury reduced corn vigor by 10% or less across treatments.
Intervention effect Early preplant burndown plus full-rate residual herbicide generally controlled giant foxtail, common waterhemp and common cocklebur by less than 80%.
Intervention effect The same strategy generally controlled common ragweed and common lambsquarters by more than 85%.
Intervention effect Two-pass strategies generally controlled all evaluated weed species by more than 85%.
Intervention effect Early postemergence strategies gave inconsistent and poor overall weed control.
Intervention effect Mid-postemergence strategies gave inconsistent and poor overall weed control.
Intervention effect Late postemergence strategies gave inconsistent and poor overall weed control.
Association Corn yield followed the weed control trend.
Association Net economic returns followed the weed control trend.
Association Strategies providing greater than 80% weed control showed minimal crop vigor reduction and high grain yields.
Intervention effect Two-pass strategies with residual herbicides generally gave the highest yields and economic returns.
Intervention effect Two-pass strategies with residual herbicides had low variation in net income.
Observation EPP strategies yielded economic returns similar to some two-pass strategies.
Observation EPP strategies had higher coefficients of variation and thus greater economic risk than some two-pass strategies.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed control at seven weeks was more variable with EPP than with EPP followed by PRE or PRE treatments.

Taxon: CornZea mays subsp. mayst0
Treatment: EPP treatmentse0
Outcome: Weed controle0
Direction: more variablee0
Qualifier: 7 wk after plantinge0
Comparator: EPP fb PRE or PRE treatmentse0

Verbatim

t0
“Corn (Zea mays)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–97

e0
“Weed control at 7 wk after planting was more variable with EPP treatments than with EPP fb PRE or PRE treatments.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–649

Title

Application Timing Affects Weed Control with Metolachlor Plus Atrazine in No-Till Corn (Zea mays)

William G. Johnson; Michael S. Defelice; Cheryl S. Holman Weed Technology 1997. doi:10.1017/s0890037x00042858

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Giant foxtail control was greatest when metolachlor was applied PRE.
Intervention effect Fall panicum control was greatest when metolachlor was applied PRE.
Intervention effect Velvetleaf control was greatest with atrazine or dicamba EPOST.
Intervention effect Common cocklebur control was greatest with atrazine or dicamba EPOST.
Intervention effect Velvetleaf control was generally below 80% with soil-applied herbicides.
Intervention effect Common cocklebur control was generally below 80% with soil-applied herbicides.
Intervention effect Common lambsquarters control exceeded 90% with all treatments including metolachlor, atrazine or dicamba regardless of timing.
Intervention effect Corn yield was slightly higher with EPP followed by PRE than with EPP alone.
Intervention effect Corn yield was slightly higher with PRE followed by EPOST dicamba than with EPP alone.
Recommendation The authors infer that applications nearer planting give less variable weed control and corn yield than applications more than 15 days EPP.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No regression adjustment was observed for maize germination with EPP.

Taxon: maizeZea mayse0
Treatment: EPPe0
Outcome: regression adjustmente0
Direction: no regression adjustmente0

Verbatim

e0
“In maize, no regression adjustment was observed for germination with EPP”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1451–1523

Title

Germination of Forage Seeds in Pyroligneous Extract

Kárida Kauane Dias Soares; Vinicius Makoto Kumi; Espedito Jamerson Tavares Luna; et al. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental 2025. doi:10.24857/rgsa.v19n5-051

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Extracts reduced germination in B. decumbens cv. Basilisk.
Intervention effect Extracts reduced root meristem development in B. decumbens cv. Basilisk.
Intervention effect Lower extract concentrations promoted apical meristem development in B. decumbens cv. Basilisk.
Intervention effect Extracts favored germination in P. maximum cv. Miyagui, except EPA.
Intervention effect Extracts favored apical and root meristem development in P. maximum cv. Miyagui, except EPA.
Intervention effect Higher doses suppressed favorable effects in P. maximum cv. Miyagui.
Intervention effect EPA had favorable effects on maize germination at lower concentrations.
Intervention effect EPC had favorable effects on maize germination at lower concentrations.

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Environment largely determined EPP in winter wheat trial II.

Outcome: EPPe0
Setting: environmente0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0
“In trial II, EPP was largely determined by environment”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–952

Title

Association Between % SDS‐Unextractable Polymeric Protein (%UPP) and End‐Use Quality in Chinese Bread Wheat Cultivars

Pingping Zhang; Zhonghu He; Yan Zhang; et al. Cereal Chemistry 2008. doi:10.1094/cchem-85-5-0696

Other claims from this paper (11)

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EPP correlated positively with dough extensibility in both trials.

Compound: EPPe0
Outcome: dough extensibilitye0
Direction: positively correlatede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0
“The EPP was positively correlated with dough extensibility”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1176

Title

Association Between % SDS‐Unextractable Polymeric Protein (%UPP) and End‐Use Quality in Chinese Bread Wheat Cultivars

Pingping Zhang; Zhonghu He; Yan Zhang; et al. Cereal Chemistry 2008. doi:10.1094/cchem-85-5-0696

Other claims from this paper (11)

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

L8 had the second highest EPP at 1.63.

Taxon: MaizeZea mayst0
Material: L8e0
Outcome: EPPe0
Direction: 2nd higheste0
Value: 1.63e0

Verbatim

e0
“The highest yielding line (L8) had the 2nd highest EPP (1.63)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1299

t0
“Maize”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–70

Title

Performance Evaluation and Identification of New Quality Protein Maize Inbred Lines

Goshime Muluneh Mekasha; Solomon Admassu Seyoum; Demewoz Negera Woreti; et al. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science 2022. doi:10.9734/ijpss/2022/v34i2331572

Other claims from this paper (18)

Observation Lines differed significantly for 28 traits at Ambo.
Observation Lines differed significantly for 24 traits at Arsi-Negele.
Observation L8 grain yield exceeded the mean of all checks by 34.89%.
Observation L8 grain yield exceeded mean QPM checks by 54.80%.
Observation L8 grain yield exceeded FS67 by 7.30%.
Observation L8 grain yield exceeded CML144 by 25.31%.
Observation EPP ranged from 0.91 in L14 to 1.85 in L3.
Observation L3 had EPP of 1.85.
Observation Overall mean EPP was 1.19.
Observation Top five QPM lines had 5.45% lower EPP than all checks.
Observation Top five QPM lines had 4.96% lower EPP than QPM line checks.
Observation Top five QPM lines had 22.41% lower EPP than best QPM check.
Observation Top five QPM lines had 6.41% lower EPP than CM check.
Observation L8 exceeded mean line checks by 25.71% in the reported mean value.
Observation L8 exceeded mean QPM line checks by 26.36% in the reported mean value.
Observation L8 exceeded best QPM check by 3.16% in the reported mean value.
Observation L8 exceeded FS67 by 24.43% in the reported mean value.
Recommendation The study identified promising QPM parental lines for breeding.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EPP contained 4.24% w/w lupeol by HPLC.

Taxon: Pyrus pashiaPyrus pashiae0
Outcome: lupeole1
Value: 4.24% w/we1

Verbatim

e0
“Pyrus pashia (EPP)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1144

e1
“The HPLC chromatogram suggested that EPP contained 4.24% w/w of lupeol”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1501–1571

Title

Quality Control standardization of Wild Himalayan Pear: Pyrus pashia

Siva Hemalatha; Priyanka Sharma; Satyendra Kuldip Prasad Pharmacognosy Journal 2016. doi:10.5530/pj.2016.4.8

Other claims from this paper (7)

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Overall mean EPP was 1.19.

Taxon: MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome: EPPe0
Value: 1.19e0

Verbatim

e0
“The value of EPP ranged from 0.91 (L14) to 1.85 (L3) with an overall mean of 1.19”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1235

t0
“Maize”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–70

Title

Performance Evaluation and Identification of New Quality Protein Maize Inbred Lines

Goshime Muluneh Mekasha; Solomon Admassu Seyoum; Demewoz Negera Woreti; et al. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science 2022. doi:10.9734/ijpss/2022/v34i2331572

Other claims from this paper (18)

Observation Lines differed significantly for 28 traits at Ambo.
Observation Lines differed significantly for 24 traits at Arsi-Negele.
Observation L8 grain yield exceeded the mean of all checks by 34.89%.
Observation L8 grain yield exceeded mean QPM checks by 54.80%.
Observation L8 grain yield exceeded FS67 by 7.30%.
Observation L8 grain yield exceeded CML144 by 25.31%.
Observation EPP ranged from 0.91 in L14 to 1.85 in L3.
Observation L3 had EPP of 1.85.
Observation L8 had the second highest EPP at 1.63.
Observation Top five QPM lines had 5.45% lower EPP than all checks.
Observation Top five QPM lines had 4.96% lower EPP than QPM line checks.
Observation Top five QPM lines had 22.41% lower EPP than best QPM check.
Observation Top five QPM lines had 6.41% lower EPP than CM check.
Observation L8 exceeded mean line checks by 25.71% in the reported mean value.
Observation L8 exceeded mean QPM line checks by 26.36% in the reported mean value.
Observation L8 exceeded best QPM check by 3.16% in the reported mean value.
Observation L8 exceeded FS67 by 24.43% in the reported mean value.
Recommendation The study identified promising QPM parental lines for breeding.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

L3 had EPP of 1.85.

Taxon: MaizeZea mayst0
Material: L3e0
Outcome: EPPe0
Value: 1.85e0

Verbatim

e0
“The value of EPP ranged from 0.91 (L14) to 1.85 (L3) with an overall mean of 1.19”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1235

t0
“Maize”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–70

Title

Performance Evaluation and Identification of New Quality Protein Maize Inbred Lines

Goshime Muluneh Mekasha; Solomon Admassu Seyoum; Demewoz Negera Woreti; et al. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science 2022. doi:10.9734/ijpss/2022/v34i2331572

Other claims from this paper (18)

Observation Lines differed significantly for 28 traits at Ambo.
Observation Lines differed significantly for 24 traits at Arsi-Negele.
Observation L8 grain yield exceeded the mean of all checks by 34.89%.
Observation L8 grain yield exceeded mean QPM checks by 54.80%.
Observation L8 grain yield exceeded FS67 by 7.30%.
Observation L8 grain yield exceeded CML144 by 25.31%.
Observation EPP ranged from 0.91 in L14 to 1.85 in L3.
Observation Overall mean EPP was 1.19.
Observation L8 had the second highest EPP at 1.63.
Observation Top five QPM lines had 5.45% lower EPP than all checks.
Observation Top five QPM lines had 4.96% lower EPP than QPM line checks.
Observation Top five QPM lines had 22.41% lower EPP than best QPM check.
Observation Top five QPM lines had 6.41% lower EPP than CM check.
Observation L8 exceeded mean line checks by 25.71% in the reported mean value.
Observation L8 exceeded mean QPM line checks by 26.36% in the reported mean value.
Observation L8 exceeded best QPM check by 3.16% in the reported mean value.
Observation L8 exceeded FS67 by 24.43% in the reported mean value.
Recommendation The study identified promising QPM parental lines for breeding.

“EPP”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics