View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism names are matched through NCBI Taxonomy: “fusarium” → Fusarium . Claims whose organism was placed there count as matches whatever the abstract calls it (maize, corn, Zea mays).
Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Fusarium head blight incidence differed among the study years.
OutcomeFusarium head blight incidencee0 Verbatim
e0 “Fusarium head blight incidence differed throughout the study years ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–308 t0 “winter wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–76 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Cultivar by location interaction was significant for Fusarium head blight incidence .
OutcomeFusarium head blight incidencee0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e7 “Fusarium head blight of barley (Hordeum vulgare ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–48 e0 “Cultivar × location interactions for DON concentration, Fusarium head blight incidence , and head ing date were significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1553–1674 Other claims from this paper (13) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Final field incidence of fusarium head blight depended on exserted anthers.
Organ / stageexserted anthers e0 Outcomefinal incidence of fusarium head blight e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “The final incidence of fusarium head blight , in the field, was dependent on the presence of exserted anthers. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–925 t0 “fusarium head blight in wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–94 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Several years of low Fusarium head blight incidence followed 2016.
Verbatim
e0 “disease of wheat in Canada ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–70 e1 “followed by several years of low incidence ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–541 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Maximum fusarium head blight incidence was at 25 C after 50 h of wetting.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the susceptible wheat cultivar BR 23 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 58–94 e1 “the maximum incidence was at 25oC, both after 50h wetting ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–471 e2 “fusarium head blight (FHB) intensity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–242 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Fusarium head blight incidence was generally lower on organically grown wheat than on wheat grown in other systems.
Treatmentgrown organically e0 OutcomeFusarium head blight incidencee0 Comparatorother systems e0 Verbatim
e0 “Fusarium head blight incidence was generally less on wheat grown organically than on wheat grown in other systems ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 456–569 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Fusarium head blight incidence in Canadian wheat rose steadily from 1995.
Verbatim
e0 “disease of wheat in Canada ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–70 e1 “a steady increase in FHB incidence from 1995 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–466 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Time of disease assessment affected the relationship between incidence and severity of Fusarium head blight in wheat.
TreatmentTime of disease assessment e1 Outcomerelationship between incidence and severity e1 Verbatim
e0 “for Fusarium head blight of wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–191 e1 “Time of disease assessment affected the relationship between incidence and severity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1099 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Fusarium head blight severity was not always correlated with incidence .
Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “disease of wheat in Canada ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–70 e1 “FHB severity has been stable over time, but not always correlated with incidence ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–651 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
All four models explained variation in Fusarium head blight incidence and severity in wheat.
Outcomedisease incidence and severity e0 Not reported Setting Direction Value
Verbatim
t0 “fusarium head blight of wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–67 e0 “Four models that use different factors were tested, and results showed all were able to explain variation for disease incidence and severity. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1079 Other claims from this paper (2) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.