Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“SWC”

1,714 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

plus 873 non-evaluative

Over time

1980 ’90 2000 ’10 ’20

Refine

More filters

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum assimilation rate had positive sensitivity to decreasing SWC when SWC was high.

Treatment: decreasing SWCe0
Outcome: Maximum photosynthetic assimilation ratee0
Direction: positivee0
Qualifier: when SWC is highe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0
“Maximum photosynthetic assimilation rate has negative sensitivity to VPD, and a positive sensitivity to decreasing SWC when SWC is high”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–892

Title

Atmospheric dryness reduces photosynthesis along a large range of soil water deficits

Zheng Fu; Philippe Ciais; I. Colin Prentice; et al. Nature Communications 2022. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-28652-7

Other claims from this paper (8)

Association GPP increased as soil water content declined from high levels.
Association GPP declined with lower soil water only below a threshold.
Association Increasing VPD negatively affected GPP throughout the soil-water range.
Association Canopy conductance declined as VPD increased regardless of SWC.
Association Canopy conductance declined with decreasing SWC on drier soils.
Association Maximum assimilation rate had negative sensitivity to VPD.
Method / resource Earth System Models underestimated the negative VPD effect on GPP.
Method / resource Earth System Models underestimated the positive SWC effect on GPP.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 25% SWC, height was 50% lower than at 100% SWC.

Taxon: fall panicumPanicum dichotomiflorume0
Treatment: 25% SWCe0
Outcome: heighte0
Direction: decreasede0
Value: 50%e0
Comparator: 100% SWCe0

Verbatim

e0
“Fall panicum height decreased by 65% and 50% at 12.5% and 25% SWC, respectively, relative to height achieved at 100% SWC.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–630

Title

Influence of soil water content on growth and panicle production of fall panicum (Panicum dichotomiflorum)

Venkatanaga Shiva Datta Kumar Sharma Chiruvelli; Hardev S. Sandhu; Ron Cherry; et al. Weed Technology 2022. doi:10.1017/wet.2022.75

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Height, leaf number and tillers declined as soil water content declined.
Intervention effect At 12.5% SWC, height was 65% lower than at 100% SWC.
Intervention effect Plants at 50% to 100% SWC reached half of tiller production in 31 to 43 days versus 28 days at 25% SWC.
Observation At 12.5% SWC plants did not reach half of tiller production.
Intervention effect Shoot and root biomass and leaf area fell as SWC fell.
Intervention effect Panicle branches per plant declined with SWC.
Intervention effect Biomass declined 83% to 85% at 12.5% SWC compared with 100% SWC.
Intervention effect Biomass declined 66% to 68% at 25% SWC compared with 100% SWC.
Intervention effect Leaf area fell 79% at 12.5% SWC versus 100% SWC.
Intervention effect Leaf area fell 65% at 25% SWC versus 100% SWC.
Observation Panicles were produced at every soil water level.
Intervention effect Panicle branches declined significantly as SWC fell.
Intervention effect Panicle branches were 82% fewer at 12.5% SWC than 100% SWC.
Intervention effect Panicle branches were 59% fewer at 25% SWC than 100% SWC.
Observation Fall panicum survived under dry conditions.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf area fell 65% at 25% SWC versus 100% SWC.

Taxon: fall panicumPanicum dichotomiflorumt0
Treatment: 25% SWCe0
Outcome: Leaf areae0
Direction: declinede0
Value: 65%e0
Comparator: 100% SWCe0

Verbatim

e0
“Leaf area declined 79% and 65% at 12.5% and 25% SWC levels, respectively, compared to the 100% SWC.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1214

t0
“fall panicum (Panicum dichotomiflorum)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–106

Title

Influence of soil water content on growth and panicle production of fall panicum (Panicum dichotomiflorum)

Venkatanaga Shiva Datta Kumar Sharma Chiruvelli; Hardev S. Sandhu; Ron Cherry; et al. Weed Technology 2022. doi:10.1017/wet.2022.75

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Height, leaf number and tillers declined as soil water content declined.
Intervention effect At 12.5% SWC, height was 65% lower than at 100% SWC.
Intervention effect At 25% SWC, height was 50% lower than at 100% SWC.
Intervention effect Plants at 50% to 100% SWC reached half of tiller production in 31 to 43 days versus 28 days at 25% SWC.
Observation At 12.5% SWC plants did not reach half of tiller production.
Intervention effect Shoot and root biomass and leaf area fell as SWC fell.
Intervention effect Panicle branches per plant declined with SWC.
Intervention effect Biomass declined 83% to 85% at 12.5% SWC compared with 100% SWC.
Intervention effect Biomass declined 66% to 68% at 25% SWC compared with 100% SWC.
Intervention effect Leaf area fell 79% at 12.5% SWC versus 100% SWC.
Observation Panicles were produced at every soil water level.
Intervention effect Panicle branches declined significantly as SWC fell.
Intervention effect Panicle branches were 82% fewer at 12.5% SWC than 100% SWC.
Intervention effect Panicle branches were 59% fewer at 25% SWC than 100% SWC.
Observation Fall panicum survived under dry conditions.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biomass declined 66% to 68% at 25% SWC compared with 100% SWC.

Taxon: fall panicumPanicum dichotomiflorume0
Treatment: 25% SWCe0
Outcome: biomasse0
Direction: decreasede0
Value: 66% to 68%e0
Comparator: 100% SWCe0

Verbatim

e0
“Fall panicum biomass decreased 83% to 85% and 66% to 68% at 12.5% and 25% SWC, respectively, relative to 100% SWC.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1114

Title

Influence of soil water content on growth and panicle production of fall panicum (Panicum dichotomiflorum)

Venkatanaga Shiva Datta Kumar Sharma Chiruvelli; Hardev S. Sandhu; Ron Cherry; et al. Weed Technology 2022. doi:10.1017/wet.2022.75

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Height, leaf number and tillers declined as soil water content declined.
Intervention effect At 12.5% SWC, height was 65% lower than at 100% SWC.
Intervention effect At 25% SWC, height was 50% lower than at 100% SWC.
Intervention effect Plants at 50% to 100% SWC reached half of tiller production in 31 to 43 days versus 28 days at 25% SWC.
Observation At 12.5% SWC plants did not reach half of tiller production.
Intervention effect Shoot and root biomass and leaf area fell as SWC fell.
Intervention effect Panicle branches per plant declined with SWC.
Intervention effect Biomass declined 83% to 85% at 12.5% SWC compared with 100% SWC.
Intervention effect Leaf area fell 79% at 12.5% SWC versus 100% SWC.
Intervention effect Leaf area fell 65% at 25% SWC versus 100% SWC.
Observation Panicles were produced at every soil water level.
Intervention effect Panicle branches declined significantly as SWC fell.
Intervention effect Panicle branches were 82% fewer at 12.5% SWC than 100% SWC.
Intervention effect Panicle branches were 59% fewer at 25% SWC than 100% SWC.
Observation Fall panicum survived under dry conditions.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Panicle branches were 59% fewer at 25% SWC than 100% SWC.

Taxon: fall panicumPanicum dichotomiflorumt0
Treatment: 25% SWCe0
Outcome: panicle branchese0
Direction: fewere0
Value: 59%e0
Comparator: 100% SWCe0

Verbatim

e0
“Plants at 12.5% and 25% SWC produced 82% and 59% fewer panicle branches, respectively, compared with plants at 100% SWC.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1359–1479

t0
“fall panicum (Panicum dichotomiflorum)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–106

Title

Influence of soil water content on growth and panicle production of fall panicum (Panicum dichotomiflorum)

Venkatanaga Shiva Datta Kumar Sharma Chiruvelli; Hardev S. Sandhu; Ron Cherry; et al. Weed Technology 2022. doi:10.1017/wet.2022.75

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Height, leaf number and tillers declined as soil water content declined.
Intervention effect At 12.5% SWC, height was 65% lower than at 100% SWC.
Intervention effect At 25% SWC, height was 50% lower than at 100% SWC.
Intervention effect Plants at 50% to 100% SWC reached half of tiller production in 31 to 43 days versus 28 days at 25% SWC.
Observation At 12.5% SWC plants did not reach half of tiller production.
Intervention effect Shoot and root biomass and leaf area fell as SWC fell.
Intervention effect Panicle branches per plant declined with SWC.
Intervention effect Biomass declined 83% to 85% at 12.5% SWC compared with 100% SWC.
Intervention effect Biomass declined 66% to 68% at 25% SWC compared with 100% SWC.
Intervention effect Leaf area fell 79% at 12.5% SWC versus 100% SWC.
Intervention effect Leaf area fell 65% at 25% SWC versus 100% SWC.
Observation Panicles were produced at every soil water level.
Intervention effect Panicle branches declined significantly as SWC fell.
Intervention effect Panicle branches were 82% fewer at 12.5% SWC than 100% SWC.
Observation Fall panicum survived under dry conditions.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 12.5% SWC, height was 65% lower than at 100% SWC.

Taxon: fall panicumPanicum dichotomiflorume0
Treatment: 12.5%e0
Outcome: heighte0
Direction: decreasede0
Value: 65%e0
Comparator: 100% SWCe0

Verbatim

e0
“Fall panicum height decreased by 65% and 50% at 12.5% and 25% SWC, respectively, relative to height achieved at 100% SWC.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–630

Title

Influence of soil water content on growth and panicle production of fall panicum (Panicum dichotomiflorum)

Venkatanaga Shiva Datta Kumar Sharma Chiruvelli; Hardev S. Sandhu; Ron Cherry; et al. Weed Technology 2022. doi:10.1017/wet.2022.75

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Height, leaf number and tillers declined as soil water content declined.
Intervention effect At 25% SWC, height was 50% lower than at 100% SWC.
Intervention effect Plants at 50% to 100% SWC reached half of tiller production in 31 to 43 days versus 28 days at 25% SWC.
Observation At 12.5% SWC plants did not reach half of tiller production.
Intervention effect Shoot and root biomass and leaf area fell as SWC fell.
Intervention effect Panicle branches per plant declined with SWC.
Intervention effect Biomass declined 83% to 85% at 12.5% SWC compared with 100% SWC.
Intervention effect Biomass declined 66% to 68% at 25% SWC compared with 100% SWC.
Intervention effect Leaf area fell 79% at 12.5% SWC versus 100% SWC.
Intervention effect Leaf area fell 65% at 25% SWC versus 100% SWC.
Observation Panicles were produced at every soil water level.
Intervention effect Panicle branches declined significantly as SWC fell.
Intervention effect Panicle branches were 82% fewer at 12.5% SWC than 100% SWC.
Intervention effect Panicle branches were 59% fewer at 25% SWC than 100% SWC.
Observation Fall panicum survived under dry conditions.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf area fell 79% at 12.5% SWC versus 100% SWC.

Taxon: fall panicumPanicum dichotomiflorumt0
Treatment: 12.5%e0
Outcome: Leaf areae0
Direction: declinede0
Value: 79%e0
Comparator: 100% SWCe0

Verbatim

e0
“Leaf area declined 79% and 65% at 12.5% and 25% SWC levels, respectively, compared to the 100% SWC.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1214

t0
“fall panicum (Panicum dichotomiflorum)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–106

Title

Influence of soil water content on growth and panicle production of fall panicum (Panicum dichotomiflorum)

Venkatanaga Shiva Datta Kumar Sharma Chiruvelli; Hardev S. Sandhu; Ron Cherry; et al. Weed Technology 2022. doi:10.1017/wet.2022.75

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Height, leaf number and tillers declined as soil water content declined.
Intervention effect At 12.5% SWC, height was 65% lower than at 100% SWC.
Intervention effect At 25% SWC, height was 50% lower than at 100% SWC.
Intervention effect Plants at 50% to 100% SWC reached half of tiller production in 31 to 43 days versus 28 days at 25% SWC.
Observation At 12.5% SWC plants did not reach half of tiller production.
Intervention effect Shoot and root biomass and leaf area fell as SWC fell.
Intervention effect Panicle branches per plant declined with SWC.
Intervention effect Biomass declined 83% to 85% at 12.5% SWC compared with 100% SWC.
Intervention effect Biomass declined 66% to 68% at 25% SWC compared with 100% SWC.
Intervention effect Leaf area fell 65% at 25% SWC versus 100% SWC.
Observation Panicles were produced at every soil water level.
Intervention effect Panicle branches declined significantly as SWC fell.
Intervention effect Panicle branches were 82% fewer at 12.5% SWC than 100% SWC.
Intervention effect Panicle branches were 59% fewer at 25% SWC than 100% SWC.
Observation Fall panicum survived under dry conditions.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biomass declined 83% to 85% at 12.5% SWC compared with 100% SWC.

Taxon: fall panicumPanicum dichotomiflorume0
Treatment: 12.5%e0
Outcome: biomasse0
Direction: decreasede0
Value: 83% to 85%e0
Comparator: 100% SWCe0

Verbatim

e0
“Fall panicum biomass decreased 83% to 85% and 66% to 68% at 12.5% and 25% SWC, respectively, relative to 100% SWC.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1114

Title

Influence of soil water content on growth and panicle production of fall panicum (Panicum dichotomiflorum)

Venkatanaga Shiva Datta Kumar Sharma Chiruvelli; Hardev S. Sandhu; Ron Cherry; et al. Weed Technology 2022. doi:10.1017/wet.2022.75

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Height, leaf number and tillers declined as soil water content declined.
Intervention effect At 12.5% SWC, height was 65% lower than at 100% SWC.
Intervention effect At 25% SWC, height was 50% lower than at 100% SWC.
Intervention effect Plants at 50% to 100% SWC reached half of tiller production in 31 to 43 days versus 28 days at 25% SWC.
Observation At 12.5% SWC plants did not reach half of tiller production.
Intervention effect Shoot and root biomass and leaf area fell as SWC fell.
Intervention effect Panicle branches per plant declined with SWC.
Intervention effect Biomass declined 66% to 68% at 25% SWC compared with 100% SWC.
Intervention effect Leaf area fell 79% at 12.5% SWC versus 100% SWC.
Intervention effect Leaf area fell 65% at 25% SWC versus 100% SWC.
Observation Panicles were produced at every soil water level.
Intervention effect Panicle branches declined significantly as SWC fell.
Intervention effect Panicle branches were 82% fewer at 12.5% SWC than 100% SWC.
Intervention effect Panicle branches were 59% fewer at 25% SWC than 100% SWC.
Observation Fall panicum survived under dry conditions.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Panicle branches were 82% fewer at 12.5% SWC than 100% SWC.

Taxon: fall panicumPanicum dichotomiflorumt0
Treatment: 12.5%e0
Outcome: panicle branchese0
Direction: fewere0
Value: 82%e0
Comparator: 100% SWCe0

Verbatim

e0
“Plants at 12.5% and 25% SWC produced 82% and 59% fewer panicle branches, respectively, compared with plants at 100% SWC.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1359–1479

t0
“fall panicum (Panicum dichotomiflorum)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–106

Title

Influence of soil water content on growth and panicle production of fall panicum (Panicum dichotomiflorum)

Venkatanaga Shiva Datta Kumar Sharma Chiruvelli; Hardev S. Sandhu; Ron Cherry; et al. Weed Technology 2022. doi:10.1017/wet.2022.75

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Height, leaf number and tillers declined as soil water content declined.
Intervention effect At 12.5% SWC, height was 65% lower than at 100% SWC.
Intervention effect At 25% SWC, height was 50% lower than at 100% SWC.
Intervention effect Plants at 50% to 100% SWC reached half of tiller production in 31 to 43 days versus 28 days at 25% SWC.
Observation At 12.5% SWC plants did not reach half of tiller production.
Intervention effect Shoot and root biomass and leaf area fell as SWC fell.
Intervention effect Panicle branches per plant declined with SWC.
Intervention effect Biomass declined 83% to 85% at 12.5% SWC compared with 100% SWC.
Intervention effect Biomass declined 66% to 68% at 25% SWC compared with 100% SWC.
Intervention effect Leaf area fell 79% at 12.5% SWC versus 100% SWC.
Intervention effect Leaf area fell 65% at 25% SWC versus 100% SWC.
Observation Panicles were produced at every soil water level.
Intervention effect Panicle branches declined significantly as SWC fell.
Intervention effect Panicle branches were 59% fewer at 25% SWC than 100% SWC.
Observation Fall panicum survived under dry conditions.

Intervention effectobservedreview summarypositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

SWC increased infiltration.

Treatment: SWCe0
Outcome: infiltratione0
Direction: increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0
“SWC increased infiltration”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1451–1477

Title

Implementation of Soil and Water Conservation in Indonesia and Its Impacts on Biodiversity, Hydrology, Soil Erosion and Microclimate

I Wayan Susi Dharmawan; Pratiwi; Chairil Anwar Siregar; et al. Applied Sciences 2023. doi:10.3390/app13137648

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect SWC increased native plant adaptation to local rainfall and soil conditions.
Intervention effect SWC improved soil hydrological characteristics.
Intervention effect Vegetation-based SWC lowered temperatures.
Intervention effect Vegetation-based SWC increased humidity.
Intervention effect Vegetation-based SWC reduced intensity levels.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“SWC”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics