View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Small temperature differences produced large yield differences .
Taxonsoft red winter wheat t0 Treatmenttemperature differences e0 Outcomedifferences in yield e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Small temperature differences resulted in large differences in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–980 t0 “soft red winter wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–66 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Grain protein yield differences were closely related to grain yield differences .
Outcomegrain protein yield e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Differences in grain protein yield were closely related to the differences in grain yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1172 t0 “durum wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–44 Other claims from this paper (9) Mechanism author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Cultivar yield differences were due to harvest-index differences .
OutcomeYield differences among cultivars e0 QualifierHI differences e0 Verbatim
e0 “Yield differences among cultivars were due to HI differences ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1093 t0 “rice ( Oryza sativa L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–216 Other claims from this paper (9) Mechanism author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield differences were attributed to cultivar yield potential.
OutcomeYield differences e0 Qualifierdifferences in yield potential e0 Verbatim
e0 “Yield differences were attributed to differences in yield potential between cultivars. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–956 e1 “peanut cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–868 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Differences in yield potential contributed to grain yield differences in all stress environments.
Outcomegrain yield differences e0 Settingall stress environments e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Differences in yield potential contributed to grain yield differences in all stress environments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–976 t0 “sorghum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–29 Other claims from this paper (7) Mechanism author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield differences among treatments reflected differences in fruit set.
Outcomedifferences in yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “the differences in yield between the various treatments were due to differences in fruit set ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2110–2202 t0 “STRAWBERRY ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–29 Other claims from this paper (11) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Seed yield differences were not associated with specific differences in plant architecture.
Organ / stageplant architecture e0 Outcomeseed yield differences e0 Directionno_change inferred e0 Verbatim
e0 “There was no evidence that seed yield differences were associated with specific differences in plant architecture. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1709–1823 t0 “Cowpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–44 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Within-color cultivar differences in yield exceeded between-color differences .
Outcomeyield differences e0 Verbatim
e0 “yield differences among cultivars within a color group were greater than differences between color groups ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–523 t0 “Winter Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation Red cultivars averaged greater total season forage yield in one season. Observation Total season forage yield was greatest for four red cultivars and Trego. Observation Color had no effect on forage nutritive value. Observation Crude protein averaged 230, 240, and 140 g kg −1 in December, March, and May, respectively. Observation Acid detergent fiber averaged 190, 240, and 320 g kg −1 across December, March, and May. Observation Neutral detergent fiber averaged 430, 410, and 550 g kg −1 across December, March, and May. Observation Total digestible nutrients averaged 790, 740, and 670 g kg −1 across December, March, and May. Observation Nitrate nitrogen averaged 247, 550, and 1366 mg kg −1 across December, March, and May. Recommendation Both red and white wheat cultivars can serve dual purpose systems without adverse forage effects. Recommendation Producers should select cultivars adapted to grazing systems and environment. Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Hybrid yield differences were related to trait-value differences .
OutcomeHybrid yield differences e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Hybrid yield differences were related to hybrid differences in trait values. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–607 t0 “corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–85 Other claims from this paper (4) Mechanism hypothesis original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors suggest that phenological differences may play an important role in explaining the yield differences among the chickpea accessions studied.
Outcomeyield differences e1 QualifierPhenological differences e1 Verbatim
e1 “Phenological differences may play an important role in explaining yield differences in the accessions studied ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1518–1627 t0 “chickpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–18 Other claims from this paper (3) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.