Refine

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Small temperature differences produced large yield differences.

Taxon
soft red winter wheatt0
Treatment
temperature differencese0
Outcome
differences in yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Small temperature differences resulted in large differences in yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–980
t0

“soft red winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–66

Title

Freeze symptoms and associated yield loss in soft red winter wheat

Laura E. Lindsey; Douglas S. Alt; Alexander J. Lindsey Crop Forage & Turfgrass Management 2020. doi:10.1002/cft2.20078

Other claims from this paper (7)
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain protein yield differences were closely related to grain yield differences.

Outcome
grain protein yielde0
Comparator
grain yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Differences in grain protein yield were closely related to the differences in grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1172
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–44

Title

Grain protein and grain yield of durum wheats from south-eastern Anatolia, Turkey

M Koç; C. Barutçular; N. Zencirci Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 2000. doi:10.1071/ar97126

Other claims from this paper (9)
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar yield differences were due to harvest-index differences.

Outcome
Yield differences among cultivarse0
Qualifier
HI differencese0

Verbatim

e0

“Yield differences among cultivars were due to HI differences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1093
t0

“rice ( Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–216

Title

Rice Parameters Describing Crop Performance of Four U.S. Cultivars

James R. Kiniry; Garry McCauley; Yun Xie; et al. Agronomy Journal 2001. doi:10.2134/agronj2001.1354

Other claims from this paper (9)
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield differences were attributed to cultivar yield potential.

Material
cultivarse0
Outcome
Yield differencese0
Qualifier
differences in yield potentiale0

Verbatim

e0

“Yield differences were attributed to differences in yield potential between cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–956
e1

“peanut cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–868

Title

Foliar Penetration and Phytotoxicity of Paraquat as Influenced by Peanut Cultivar1

G. Wehtje; J. W. Wilcut; J. A. McGuire; et al. Peanut Science 1991. doi:10.3146/i0095-3679-18-2-2

Other claims from this paper (4)
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Differences in yield potential contributed to grain yield differences in all stress environments.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
grain yield differencese0
Setting
all stress environmentse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Differences in yield potential contributed to grain yield differences in all stress environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–976
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–29

Title

Hybrid performance of sorghum and its relationship to morphological and physiological traits under variable drought stress in Kenya

B. I. G. Haussmann; A. B. Obilana; A. Blum; et al. Plant Breeding 1998. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0523.1998.tb01930.x

Other claims from this paper (7)
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield differences among treatments reflected differences in fruit set.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Organ / stage
fruit sete0
Outcome
differences in yielde0

Verbatim

e0

“the differences in yield between the various treatments were due to differences in fruit set”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2110–2202
t0

“STRAWBERRY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–29

Title

THE PERFORMANCE OF STRAWBERRY PLUGS IN QUEENSLAND

M.C. Menzel; G.K. Waite Acta Horticulturae 2006. doi:10.17660/actahortic.2006.708.35

Other claims from this paper (11)
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed yield differences were not associated with specific differences in plant architecture.

Organ / stage
plant architecturee0
Outcome
seed yield differencese0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0

Verbatim

e0

“There was no evidence that seed yield differences were associated with specific differences in plant architecture.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1709–1823
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–44

Title

Distribution Pattern of Seed Yield in Cowpea

Brain A. Kahn; Peter J. Stoffella Crop Science 1989. doi:10.2135/cropsci1989.0011183x002900040032x

Other claims from this paper (9)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Within-color cultivar differences in yield exceeded between-color differences.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
yield differencese0
Direction
greatere0

Verbatim

e0

“yield differences among cultivars within a color group were greater than differences between color groups”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–523
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72

Title

Forage Yield and Nutritive Value of Hard Red and Hard White Winter Wheat

Johnathon D. Holman; Curtis R. Thompson; Ronald L. Hale; et al. Agronomy Journal 2010. doi:10.2134/agronj2009.0378

Other claims from this paper (10)
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrid yield differences were related to trait-value differences.

Material
hybride0
Outcome
Hybrid yield differencese0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Hybrid yield differences were related to hybrid differences in trait values.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–607
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–85

Title

Analysis of biological traits contributing to grain yield of short-to mid-season corn (Zea mays L.) hybrids

L. M. Dwyer; H. N. Hayhoe; W. Royds; et al. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 1991. doi:10.4141/cjps91-078

Other claims from this paper (4)
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest that phenological differences may play an important role in explaining the yield differences among the chickpea accessions studied.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
yield differencese1
Qualifier
Phenological differencese1

Verbatim

e1

“Phenological differences may play an important role in explaining yield differences in the accessions studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1518–1627
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–18

Title

Screening chickpea resistance to water deficits: the yield perspective.

Isabel Duarte; Luís Leopoldo Silva; N. Simões; et al. Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) 2012

Other claims from this paper (3)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.