View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf mass per area showed no significant relation with leaf area, average leaf width or width -to-length ratio.
8 indigenous greening species e0 leaf area,average leaf width and ratio of width to length e6 no_change inferred e6 Verbatim
e0 “leaf structure characteristics of 8 indigenous greening species in Guangzhou and Zhanjiang were studied ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 123–226 e6 “There were not significant relation between LMA and leaf area, average leaf width and ratio of width to length ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1211–1320 Other claims from this paper (15) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Maximum and average leaf length and maximum leaf width did not change significantly with depth.
maximum leaf length, average leaf length, maximum leaf width e0 changed insignificantly e0 Verbatim
e0 “the maximum leaf length, average leaf length, maximum leaf width changed insignificantly with the water depth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–803 t0 “Vallisneria natans
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–59 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Maximum and average leaf length and maximum leaf width did not change significantly.
maximum leaf length,average leaf length,maximum leaf width e0 did not change e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “while the maximum leaf length, average leaf length,maximum leaf width did not change significantly. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–626 t0 “Influences of water depth gradient on photosynthetic fluorescence characteristics of Vallisneria natans ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–103 Other claims from this paper (14) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
With increasing water depth, maximum leaf length, average leaf length and maximum leaf width did not change significantly.
water depth increasing e1 maximum leaf length, average leaf length, maximum leaf width e1 did not change e1 Verbatim
t0 “photosynthetic fluorescence characteristics of Vallisneria natans ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–103 e1 “with water depth increasing, the number of ramets and leaves, total root length, root surface area decreased significantly, while the maximum leaf length, average leaf length, maximum leaf width did not change significantly ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1162 Other claims from this paper (13) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The eight pepper treatments did not differ statistically in yield per plant, fruit number or average fruit weight, plant height, stem thickness, leaf length or leaf width .
yield per plant (RPP), number of fruits per plant (NFP), average weight per fruit (PPF) e0 no statistical differences e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “no statistical differences were found in yield per plant (RPP), number of fruits per plant (NFP), average weight per fruit (PPF), plant height (AP), stem thickness (GT), leaf length (AL) and leaf width (AH) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–834 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation Hybrids were superior for fruit base width. Observation G4, G6 and the hybrids were better for average fruit width. Observation G2, G5 and G6 stood out for fruit length. Observation G1, G3 and G4 stood out for calyx depth. Observation G4 differed from the others in peduncle length. Observation G2, G4, G6 and hybrids were superior for mesocarp thickness. Association Yield was positively correlated with fruit number, MG and fruit base width, with coefficients 0.66, 0.46 and 0.38. Observation G2, G4 and G6 F2 genotypes were highlighted for agronomic potential relative to the hybrids. Recommendation The authors suggest continuing to select G2, G4 and G6 in a breeding program. Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Average annual growth ring width did not differ significantly among trees.
annual growth rings e1 Verbatim
e0 “young Big- Leaf Mahogany (Swietenia macrophylla ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–656 e1 “the average of annual growth rings varied from 0.679 cm/year to 1.047 cm/year ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1194 e2 “was not significantly different among trees ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1200–1243 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Across doubled-haploid lines, the relationships between leaf and cell width and between leaf and cell length were not statistically different.
relationships between leaf and cell width, and leaf and cell length e1 not statistically different e1 Verbatim
e1 “Correlations for leaf and average cell size across DHLs revealed a strong and positive relationship between leaf width and cell files, while the relationships between leaf and cell width , and leaf and cell length were not statistically different ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1532–1777 t0 “Triticum aestivum L.
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–139 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Peanut skin media, fern media and their mixture did not differ significantly in growth variables of Phalaenopsis amabilis .
peanut skin media e3 growth variables e4 no significant difference e2 Verbatim
t0 “Moon Orchid (Phalaenopsis amabilis ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–84 e3 “Treatment A by giving fern media, treatment B by giving fern media mixed with peanut skin, and treatment C by giving peanut skin media ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–1024 e4 “all observed growth variables (number of leaves, leaf width , leaf length, leaf area, number of roots, average root length, and wet weight) were treated with fern ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1339–1500 e2 “there was no significant difference in the effect on the growth of the month orchid ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1565–1648 Other claims from this paper (2) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Ground speeds of 2, 4 and 6 km/h had no significant effect on system performance in apple and peach orchards.
ground speeds of 2, 4 and 6 km/h e2 system performance e2 due to ground speed e2 Verbatim
e1 “Field tests in apple and peach orchards at different stages of leaf development found the system to measure tree width and extension with <10% average error and high precision ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–545 e2 “Tests at ground speeds of 2, 4 and 6 km/h found no significant effect on system performance due to ground speed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–658 Other claims from this paper (2) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Vallisneria natans
Triticum aestivum
Phalaenopsis amabilis
Malus domestica
Prunus persica