Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“decrease in density”

8 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

plus 1 non-evaluative

Over time

1990 2000 ’10

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

Taxon: tomato ✕

Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sesame produced the greatest significant reduction in broomrape density.

Taxon: tomatoSolanum lycopersicume1
Treatment: sesamee0
Interactor: Broomrapee0parasite
Outcome: Broomrape densitye0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Results showed that sesame had most significant decrease in Broomrape density.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–967

e1
“damage reduction to tomato”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–246

Title

Evaluations of some trap crop efficiencies to Broomrape (Orobanche aegyptiaca) damage reduction in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum).

Sirwan Babaei; Hassan Alizadeh; Mohammad Reza Jahansuz; et al. 2010

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effect Black-eyed pea partly reduced broomrape damage to tomato.
Intervention effect Mungbean partly reduced broomrape damage to tomato.
Intervention effect Black-eyed pea increased tomato yield.
Intervention effect Mungbean increased tomato yield.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing wood fiber density significantly decreased nutrient solution EC.

Taxon: TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
Material: Emotion F1e1
Treatment: wood fiber with an increasing densitye0
Outcome: EC in nutrient solutione0
Direction: decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Greenhouse Tomato”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–89

e0
“Decrease of the main nutrients in the root environment of plants grown in the wood fiber with an increasing density, significantly decreased EC in nutrient solution”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1040

e1
“greenhouse tomato cv. Emotion F1 grown in the slabs of wood fiber”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–419

Title

Changes of Macro and Micronutrients Contents in the Root Environment of Greenhouse Tomato Grown in Fiber Wood

Andrzej Komosa; Józef Piróg; Tomasz Kleiber Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Research 2009. doi:10.2478/v10032-009-0007-x

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effect Higher wood fiber density decreased N-NO 3, P and K contents in the tomato root environment.
Intervention effect Higher wood fiber density decreased Ca, S-SO 4 and Fe contents.
Intervention effect Higher wood fiber density increased N-NH 4 and Mn contents.
Intervention effect Wood fiber density had no significant effect on Mg, Zn and Cu contents.
Intervention effect Wood fiber density had no significant effect on B and Na contents.
Intervention effect Increasing wood fiber density did not significantly change pH.
Intervention effect At equal density, wood fiber and rockwool differed significantly in N-NH 4, N-NO 3 and K contents.
Intervention effect At equal density, wood fiber and rockwool differed significantly in Fe and Zn contents.
Intervention effect Wood fiber had higher N-NO 3, K and Zn contents than rockwool.
Intervention effect Rockwool had higher N-NH 4 and Fe contents than wood fiber.
Intervention effect Rockwool showed a ranked series of decreasing nutrient contents.
Intervention effect Wood fiber showed a ranked series of decreasing nutrient contents.
Intervention effect In wood fiber, Cu, Fe and N-NH 4 concentration showed no effect, unlike in rockwool.

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Density of Tuta absoluta infestation was strongly negatively correlated with tomato crop yield

Taxon: tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment: density of infestatione1
Interactor: Tuta absolutaTuta absolutae1pest
Outcome: crop yield of tomatoe1
Direction: decreaseinferrede1
Setting: EL- Sharkia governoratee0

Verbatim

t0
“TUTA ABSOLUTA (MEYRICK) IN TOMATO CROPS”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–108

e0
“experiment was carried out for two successive seasons (2016 and 2017) at EL- Sharkia governorate”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–96

e1
“strong significantly negative indicating a strong negative relationship between the density of infestation (Tuta absoluta) and the corresponding crop yield of tomato produced”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 363–537

Title

LOSS ASSESSMENT AND THE ESTIMATION OF ECONOMIC INFESTATION LEVELS OF TUTA ABSOLUTA (MEYRICK) IN TOMATO CROPS AT EL- SHARKIA GOVERNORATE

MONA. I. AMMAR; MOHAMED H. SOLIMAN; AFAF M. EL- ROBY Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research 2018. doi:10.21608/ejar.2018.142678

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Brushing before transplanting to the field significantly decreased stem elongation of tomato by about 20%.

Taxon: tomatoSolanum lycopersicume1
Treatment: Brushing before transplanting to the fielde6
Outcome: stem elongatione6
Direction: decreasee6
Value: ~20%e6
Setting: the fielde6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1
“Brushing was applied to tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) seedlings growing at a density of 2100 plants m-2 by daily stroking with a piece of polystyrene.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–354

e6
“Brushing before transplanting to the field resulted in a significant decrease in stem elongation (~20%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–957

Title

COMMERCIAL ADAPTATIONS OF MECHANICAL STIMULATION FOR THE CONTROL OF TRANSPLANT GROWTH

L. Garner; F. Allen Langton; T. Björkman Acta Horticulturae 1997. doi:10.17660/actahortic.1997.435.21

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effect Ten or twenty daily strokes provided significant height control in tomato seedlings without plant damage.
Intervention effect Brushing intervals of up to 10 minutes gave the same height control in tomato as continuous brushing.
Intervention effect Treating tomato plants at 0800 or at 1700 hours produced no differences.
Intervention effect Brushing begun at the first or second true leaf stage achieved significant height control in tomato.
Intervention effect Brushing begun at a later stage of development caused leaf damage in tomato.
Intervention effect Brushed and unbrushed tomato plants showed no significant differences in long-term growth or final fruit yield after transplanting to the field.
Observation In geranium and impatiens, reductions in plant stature were associated with significant plant damage.
Intervention effect Brushing induced a prostrate growth habit and leaf distortion in petunia.
Intervention effect Brushing significantly reduced leaf area and shoot dry weight of petunia.
Intervention effect Pansy plants were undamaged by 10 or 20 brush strokes per day.
Intervention effect Brushing significantly decreased petiole length of pansy by 17–22%.
Intervention effect Brushing typically had no significant effects on leaf area, dry weight or days to flower of pansy.
Recommendation Brushing is an effective method for controlling tomato and pansy transplant size without adversely affecting quality or long-term growth.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

APRI decreased 15N loss by 35.4-54.6% compared with CI.

Taxon: tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
Treatment: APRIe4
Outcome: 15N losse4
Direction: decreasee4
Value: 35.4-54.6%e4
Comparator: compared to CIe4

Verbatim

e0
“Results showed that, compared to CI, APRI did not significantly (p>0.05) impact the growth and biomass accumulation in aboveground part of tomato, while it enhanced the root, reflecting by greater length density and more dry mass”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–777

e4
“Significant (p<0.05) 15N recovery increase of 10.2-13.2% and 15N loss decrease of 35.4-54.6% were found for APRI compared to CI”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1361

Title

Growth, Water Use, and Nitrate-15N Uptake of Greenhouse Tomato as Influenced by Different Irrigation Patterns, 15N Labeled Depths, and Transplant Times

Maomao Hou; Qiu Jin; Xinyu Lu; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2017. doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.00666

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect APRI did not significantly affect aboveground growth and biomass accumulation of tomato compared with CI.
Intervention effect APRI enhanced root length density of tomato compared with CI.
Intervention effect APRI increased root dry mass of tomato compared with CI.
Intervention effect APRI produced marginally lower tomato yields than CI.
Intervention effect APRI saved 34.9% of irrigation water compared with CI.
Intervention effect APRI gave a 37.6-49.9% higher water use efficiency than CI.
Intervention effect APRI increased soluble solid content of tomato fruit by 12.8-21.6% compared with CI.
Intervention effect APRI increased vitamin C content of tomato fruit by 2.8-12.7% compared with CI.
Intervention effect APRI increased the sugar/acid ratio of tomato fruit by 3.5-8.5% compared with CI.
Intervention effect The 15N utilization efficiency of tomato was higher under APRI than under CI, more evidently when 15N was labeled at 50 cm depth.
Intervention effect APRI increased 15N recovery by 10.2-13.2% compared with CI.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ten or twenty daily strokes provided significant height control in tomato seedlings without plant damage.

Taxon: tomatoSolanum lycopersicume1
Treatment: Ten or twenty daily strokese2
Outcome: height controle2
Direction: decreaseinferrede2
Qualifier: without plant damagee2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1
“Brushing was applied to tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) seedlings growing at a density of 2100 plants m-2 by daily stroking with a piece of polystyrene.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–354

e2
“Ten or twenty daily strokes typically provided significant height control without plant damage”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–449

Title

COMMERCIAL ADAPTATIONS OF MECHANICAL STIMULATION FOR THE CONTROL OF TRANSPLANT GROWTH

L. Garner; F. Allen Langton; T. Björkman Acta Horticulturae 1997. doi:10.17660/actahortic.1997.435.21

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effect Brushing intervals of up to 10 minutes gave the same height control in tomato as continuous brushing.
Intervention effect Treating tomato plants at 0800 or at 1700 hours produced no differences.
Intervention effect Brushing begun at the first or second true leaf stage achieved significant height control in tomato.
Intervention effect Brushing begun at a later stage of development caused leaf damage in tomato.
Intervention effect Brushing before transplanting to the field significantly decreased stem elongation of tomato by about 20%.
Intervention effect Brushed and unbrushed tomato plants showed no significant differences in long-term growth or final fruit yield after transplanting to the field.
Observation In geranium and impatiens, reductions in plant stature were associated with significant plant damage.
Intervention effect Brushing induced a prostrate growth habit and leaf distortion in petunia.
Intervention effect Brushing significantly reduced leaf area and shoot dry weight of petunia.
Intervention effect Pansy plants were undamaged by 10 or 20 brush strokes per day.
Intervention effect Brushing significantly decreased petiole length of pansy by 17–22%.
Intervention effect Brushing typically had no significant effects on leaf area, dry weight or days to flower of pansy.
Recommendation Brushing is an effective method for controlling tomato and pansy transplant size without adversely affecting quality or long-term growth.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Brushing begun at the first or second true leaf stage achieved significant height control in tomato.

Taxon: tomatoSolanum lycopersicume1
Organ / stage: first or second true leaf stagee5
Treatment: treatments were begun at the first or second true leaf stagee5
Outcome: height controle5
Direction: decreaseinferrede5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1
“Brushing was applied to tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) seedlings growing at a density of 2100 plants m-2 by daily stroking with a piece of polystyrene.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–354

e5
“Significant height control was achieved if treatments were begun at the first or second true leaf stage, but treatments begun at a later stage of development resulted in leaf damage.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–853

Title

COMMERCIAL ADAPTATIONS OF MECHANICAL STIMULATION FOR THE CONTROL OF TRANSPLANT GROWTH

L. Garner; F. Allen Langton; T. Björkman Acta Horticulturae 1997. doi:10.17660/actahortic.1997.435.21

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effect Ten or twenty daily strokes provided significant height control in tomato seedlings without plant damage.
Intervention effect Brushing intervals of up to 10 minutes gave the same height control in tomato as continuous brushing.
Intervention effect Treating tomato plants at 0800 or at 1700 hours produced no differences.
Intervention effect Brushing begun at a later stage of development caused leaf damage in tomato.
Intervention effect Brushing before transplanting to the field significantly decreased stem elongation of tomato by about 20%.
Intervention effect Brushed and unbrushed tomato plants showed no significant differences in long-term growth or final fruit yield after transplanting to the field.
Observation In geranium and impatiens, reductions in plant stature were associated with significant plant damage.
Intervention effect Brushing induced a prostrate growth habit and leaf distortion in petunia.
Intervention effect Brushing significantly reduced leaf area and shoot dry weight of petunia.
Intervention effect Pansy plants were undamaged by 10 or 20 brush strokes per day.
Intervention effect Brushing significantly decreased petiole length of pansy by 17–22%.
Intervention effect Brushing typically had no significant effects on leaf area, dry weight or days to flower of pansy.
Recommendation Brushing is an effective method for controlling tomato and pansy transplant size without adversely affecting quality or long-term growth.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

APRI increased 15N recovery by 10.2-13.2% compared with CI.

Taxon: tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
Treatment: APRIe4
Outcome: 15N recoverye4
Direction: increasee4
Value: 10.2-13.2%e4
Comparator: compared to CIe4

Verbatim

e0
“Results showed that, compared to CI, APRI did not significantly (p>0.05) impact the growth and biomass accumulation in aboveground part of tomato, while it enhanced the root, reflecting by greater length density and more dry mass”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–777

e4
“Significant (p<0.05) 15N recovery increase of 10.2-13.2% and 15N loss decrease of 35.4-54.6% were found for APRI compared to CI”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1361

Title

Growth, Water Use, and Nitrate-15N Uptake of Greenhouse Tomato as Influenced by Different Irrigation Patterns, 15N Labeled Depths, and Transplant Times

Maomao Hou; Qiu Jin; Xinyu Lu; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2017. doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.00666

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect APRI did not significantly affect aboveground growth and biomass accumulation of tomato compared with CI.
Intervention effect APRI enhanced root length density of tomato compared with CI.
Intervention effect APRI increased root dry mass of tomato compared with CI.
Intervention effect APRI produced marginally lower tomato yields than CI.
Intervention effect APRI saved 34.9% of irrigation water compared with CI.
Intervention effect APRI gave a 37.6-49.9% higher water use efficiency than CI.
Intervention effect APRI increased soluble solid content of tomato fruit by 12.8-21.6% compared with CI.
Intervention effect APRI increased vitamin C content of tomato fruit by 2.8-12.7% compared with CI.
Intervention effect APRI increased the sugar/acid ratio of tomato fruit by 3.5-8.5% compared with CI.
Intervention effect The 15N utilization efficiency of tomato was higher under APRI than under CI, more evidently when 15N was labeled at 50 cm depth.
Intervention effect APRI decreased 15N loss by 35.4-54.6% compared with CI.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“decrease in density”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics