View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon: maize ✕
Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Salt stress similarly reduced leaf relative water content in both maize cultivars.
Outcomeleaf relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “salt stress caused a similar decrease in leaf relative water content in both maize cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1089 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Osmotic stress decrease d seedling relative water content .
Treatmentosmotic stress t0 Outcomeseedling relative water content (RWC) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a decrease in seedling relative water content (RWC) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1153 t0 “osmotic stress resistance by improving leaf photosynthetic physiology and antioxidant capacity in maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–144 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Exogenous Spd in hibited the decline in leaf relative water content under osmotic stress.
TreatmentExogenous Spd treatment e0 Outcomeleaf relative water content e0 Directioninhibited the decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Exogenous Spd treatment not only obviously in hibited the decrease of leaf relative water content ,but also in creased the content of soluble protein. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–814 t0 “Maize Seedlings ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–85 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
In maize under elevated CO2, leaf relative water content starts to decrease at a lower FTSW threshold than in wheat (0.21 vs 0.43).
Outcomeleaf relative water content e6 Directionstarts to decrease e6 Verbatim
e5 “After onset of progressive soil drying, maize plants in e[CO 2 ] showed lower FTSW thresholds than wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–899 e6 “at which e.g. g s (0.31 vs 0.40) and leaf relative water content (0.21 vs 0.43) starts to decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–999 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect Under non-drought stress, elevated CO2 increased the net photosynthetic rate only in wheat. Intervention effect Under non-drought stress, elevated CO2 increased dry matter accumulation in wheat and maize. Intervention effect Under non-drought stress, elevated CO2 decreased stomatal conductance and water consumption. Intervention effect Under non-drought stress, elevated CO2 enhanced WUE by 27.82% in maize. Intervention effect Under non-drought stress, elevated CO2 enhanced WUE by 49.86% in wheat. Association After onset of progressive soil drying, maize under elevated CO2 showed lower FTSW thresholds than wheat. Association In maize under elevated CO2, stomatal conductance starts to decrease at a lower FTSW threshold than in wheat (0.31 vs 0.40). Association The authors interpret elevated CO2 as conferring greater drought resistance in maize. Association Under combined elevated CO2 and drought, enhanced WUE was found only in wheat. Association Under combined elevated CO2 and drought, DMA increased in wheat. Association Under combined elevated CO2 and drought, water consumption was unaffected in wheat. Recommendation The authors recommend developing specific water management strategies to optimize crop WUE for different species under future drier, CO2-enriched conditions. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought sharply decrease d relative water content and pigment content in maize seedlings relative to control.
OutcomeRelative Water Content (RWC) e1 DirectionSharp decrease e1 Comparatorcontrol condition e1 Verbatim
t0 “Drought in Maize (Zea mays L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–116 e1 “Sharp decrease in Relative Water Content (RWC), Chl a, Chl b, carotenoid (Car) and total pigment content was observed under drought compared to control condition, while PAs application reversed their decreasing trends ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–578 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Water stress reduced relative water content more in BN 1133, Dhanya and Swarna.
MaterialBN 1133, Dhanya and Swarna e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Water stress in duced decrease in RWC was greater in BN 1133, Dhanya and Swarna ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1491–1569 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Exogenous Spd in hibited the fall in leaf relative water content .
TreatmentExogenous Spd treatment e0 Outcomeleaf relative water content e0 Directioninhibited the decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Exogenous Spd treatment not only obviously in hibited the decrease of leaf relative water content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–766 t0 “Effects of Polyamine on Leaf Physiological and Biochemical In dexes of Maize Seedlings under Osmotic Stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–106 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Combined As+PEG stress decrease d relative water content of maize seedlings by 35%.
Treatmentcombined As+PEG stress e2 Outcomerelative water content (RWC) e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “the relative growth rate (RGR) of maize seedlings under As and drought stress was reduced by 38 % and 50 %, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–756 e2 “with a 35 % decrease in relative water content (RWC) under combined As+PEG stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–839 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Brassinolide decrease d MDA content by 24% relative to distilled water -sprayed plants.
Comparatordistilled water-sprayed plants e5 Verbatim
t0 “Brassinolide Alleviates Maize Silk Growth Under Water Deficit ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–61 e1 “then applied foliar BR at concentrations ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–389 e5 “with distilled water -sprayed plants serving as controls ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–475 e2 “a 24% decrease in MDA content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1068 Other claims from this paper (17) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Reducing ZmHSF10 expression in maize (VIGS-silenced) decrease d chlorophyll content , cell membrane stability and relative water content in leaves under high temperature stress.
TreatmentReducing the expression level of ZmHSF10 e0 Outcomechlorophyll content, poor cell membrane stability, and lower relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Reducing the expression level of ZmHSF10 leads to a decrease in chlorophyll content , poor cell membrane stability, and lower relative water content in maize leaves under high temperature stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1377 Other claims from this paper (5) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.