Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“decrease in relative water content”

6 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

plus 1 non-evaluative

Over time

2010 ’20

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

Taxon: winter wheat ✕

Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought decreased relative water content across all cultivars.

Taxon: winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: drought-treatede0
Outcome: relative water content (RWC)e0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“winter wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–49

e0
“a decrease in relative water content (RWC) and increase of malondialdehyde content were observed in drought-treated plants of all cultivars.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–697

Title

Metabolic response to drought in six winter wheat genotypes

Tihana Marček; Kamirán Áron Hamow; Balázs Végh; et al. PLoS ONE 2019. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0212411

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Drought lowered CO2 assimilation and transpiration rate across all cultivars.
Observation Drought caused stomata closure across all cultivars.
Intervention effect Drought increased malondialdehyde content across all cultivars.
Observation The drought-related changes were most pronounced in Ellvis.
Observation Soissons retained higher relative water content and CO2 assimilation under drought.
Intervention effect Sugars, organic acids, amino acids and sugar alcohols accumulated to higher levels with drought than in controls.
Association Several metabolites accumulated differently among genotypes under drought.
Intervention effect Drought induced sucrose, malic and oxalic acids in four of six genotypes.
Intervention effect Drought induced unknown organic acid 1 and unknown disaccharides 1, 2 and 3 in four of six genotypes.
Intervention effect Drought induced GABA, L-threonine and glutamic acid in four of six genotypes.
Observation Soissons accumulated the highest amount of unknown disaccharide 5, galactonic and phosphoric acids.
Intervention effect Srpanjka increased glucose and fructose under drought.
Observation Srpanjka accumulated unidentified sugar alcohols 1 and 2 under drought.
Intervention effect In Ellvis, drought decreased Pn, gs and RWC.
Intervention effect In Ellvis, drought decreased accumulation of sucrose, glucose and fructose.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green manure did not decrease subsequent wheat season soil water content and storage in the first two years.

Taxon: winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment: GMe0
Outcome: soil water content and storagee0
Direction: did not decreasee0
Qualifier: 0–200 cm layere0
Comparator: BLe0

Verbatim

e0
“GM did not decrease the soil water content and storage (0–200 cm layer) during the subsequent winter wheat season, relative to BL”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1276

Title

Legume Green Manure Further Improves the Effects of Fertilization on the Long-Term Yield and Water and Nitrogen Utilization of Winter Wheat in Rainfed Agriculture

Xiushuang Li; Juan Chen; Jianglan Shi; et al. Plants 2025. doi:10.3390/plants14162476

Other claims from this paper (18)

Intervention effect Green manure raised winter wheat grain yield by 3.2% in year three.
Intervention effect Green manure raised winter wheat grain yield by 3.8% in year four.
Intervention effect B increased winter wheat grain yield by 14.4% in year three.
Intervention effect BS increased winter wheat grain yield by 22.2% in year three.
Intervention effect B increased winter wheat grain yield by 12.7% in year four.
Intervention effect BS increased winter wheat grain yield by 19.4% in year four.
Mechanism Yield increases arose primarily through increased wheat population density.
Mechanism Higher grain yield contributed to higher wheat water use efficiency.
Intervention effect In year three, GM increased wheat water consumption (WC) by 2.4%.
Intervention effect In year three, GM increased wheat WUE by 1.7%.
Intervention effect In year three, B increased wheat water consumption (WC) by 8.3%.
Intervention effect In year three, B increased wheat WUE by 5.6%.
Intervention effect In year three, BS increased wheat water consumption (WC) by 10.4%.
Intervention effect In year three, BS increased wheat WUE by 10.7%.
Intervention effect Basal fertilizer and basal fertilizer with straw produced higher yield and nitrogen nutrition than green manure alone.
Intervention effect Green manure with basal fertilizer and straw achieved the highest yield and nitrogen nutrition.
Intervention effect Green manure combined with fertilization decreased nitrogen uptake efficiency.
Intervention effect Green manure combined with fertilization increased nitrogen productivity.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusarium culmorum inoculation increased protein content, ash content and flour water absorption relative to the water control.

Taxon: Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: Fusarium culmorum inoculatione0
Interactor: Fusarium culmorumFusarium culmorume0pathogen
Outcome: protein, ash content, and flour water absorptione0
Direction: increasee0
Comparator: distilled watere2

Verbatim

e0
“Fusarium culmorum inoculation resulted in an increase in protein, ash content, and flour water absorption, changes in dough rheological properties, and a decrease in the sedimentation index”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–942

t0
“Winter Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–77

e2
“distilled water”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–586

Title

The Influence of Fusarium culmorum on the Technological Value of Winter Wheat Cultivars

Edyta Aleksandrowicz; Krzysztof Dziedzic; Anna Szafrańska; et al. Agriculture 2025. doi:10.3390/agriculture15060666

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought lowered CO2 assimilation and transpiration rate across all cultivars.

Taxon: winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: drought-treatede0
Outcome: CO2 assimilation (Pn) and transpiration ratee0
Direction: declinee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“winter wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–49

e0
“A decline in CO2 assimilation (Pn) and transpiration rate, stomata closure, a decrease in relative water content (RWC) and increase of malondialdehyde content were observed in drought-treated plants of all cultivars.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–697

Title

Metabolic response to drought in six winter wheat genotypes

Tihana Marček; Kamirán Áron Hamow; Balázs Végh; et al. PLoS ONE 2019. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0212411

Other claims from this paper (15)

Observation Drought caused stomata closure across all cultivars.
Intervention effect Drought decreased relative water content across all cultivars.
Intervention effect Drought increased malondialdehyde content across all cultivars.
Observation The drought-related changes were most pronounced in Ellvis.
Observation Soissons retained higher relative water content and CO2 assimilation under drought.
Intervention effect Sugars, organic acids, amino acids and sugar alcohols accumulated to higher levels with drought than in controls.
Association Several metabolites accumulated differently among genotypes under drought.
Intervention effect Drought induced sucrose, malic and oxalic acids in four of six genotypes.
Intervention effect Drought induced unknown organic acid 1 and unknown disaccharides 1, 2 and 3 in four of six genotypes.
Intervention effect Drought induced GABA, L-threonine and glutamic acid in four of six genotypes.
Observation Soissons accumulated the highest amount of unknown disaccharide 5, galactonic and phosphoric acids.
Intervention effect Srpanjka increased glucose and fructose under drought.
Observation Srpanjka accumulated unidentified sugar alcohols 1 and 2 under drought.
Intervention effect In Ellvis, drought decreased Pn, gs and RWC.
Intervention effect In Ellvis, drought decreased accumulation of sucrose, glucose and fructose.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green manure raised winter wheat grain yield by 3.2% in year three.

Taxon: winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment: GMe0
Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: increasede0
Value: 3.2%e0
Comparator: BLe1

Verbatim

e0
“in the third and fourth years, GM increased the grain yield of winter wheat by 3.2% and 3.8%, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1388

t0
“Winter Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–139

e1
“GM did not decrease the soil water content and storage (0–200 cm layer) during the subsequent winter wheat season, relative to BL”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1276

Title

Legume Green Manure Further Improves the Effects of Fertilization on the Long-Term Yield and Water and Nitrogen Utilization of Winter Wheat in Rainfed Agriculture

Xiushuang Li; Juan Chen; Jianglan Shi; et al. Plants 2025. doi:10.3390/plants14162476

Other claims from this paper (18)

Intervention effect Green manure did not decrease subsequent wheat season soil water content and storage in the first two years.
Intervention effect Green manure raised winter wheat grain yield by 3.8% in year four.
Intervention effect B increased winter wheat grain yield by 14.4% in year three.
Intervention effect BS increased winter wheat grain yield by 22.2% in year three.
Intervention effect B increased winter wheat grain yield by 12.7% in year four.
Intervention effect BS increased winter wheat grain yield by 19.4% in year four.
Mechanism Yield increases arose primarily through increased wheat population density.
Mechanism Higher grain yield contributed to higher wheat water use efficiency.
Intervention effect In year three, GM increased wheat water consumption (WC) by 2.4%.
Intervention effect In year three, GM increased wheat WUE by 1.7%.
Intervention effect In year three, B increased wheat water consumption (WC) by 8.3%.
Intervention effect In year three, B increased wheat WUE by 5.6%.
Intervention effect In year three, BS increased wheat water consumption (WC) by 10.4%.
Intervention effect In year three, BS increased wheat WUE by 10.7%.
Intervention effect Basal fertilizer and basal fertilizer with straw produced higher yield and nitrogen nutrition than green manure alone.
Intervention effect Green manure with basal fertilizer and straw achieved the highest yield and nitrogen nutrition.
Intervention effect Green manure combined with fertilization decreased nitrogen uptake efficiency.
Intervention effect Green manure combined with fertilization increased nitrogen productivity.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green manure raised winter wheat grain yield by 3.8% in year four.

Taxon: winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment: GMe0
Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: increasede0
Value: 3.8%e0
Comparator: BLe1

Verbatim

e0
“in the third and fourth years, GM increased the grain yield of winter wheat by 3.2% and 3.8%, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1388

t0
“Winter Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–139

e1
“GM did not decrease the soil water content and storage (0–200 cm layer) during the subsequent winter wheat season, relative to BL”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1276

Title

Legume Green Manure Further Improves the Effects of Fertilization on the Long-Term Yield and Water and Nitrogen Utilization of Winter Wheat in Rainfed Agriculture

Xiushuang Li; Juan Chen; Jianglan Shi; et al. Plants 2025. doi:10.3390/plants14162476

Other claims from this paper (18)

Intervention effect Green manure did not decrease subsequent wheat season soil water content and storage in the first two years.
Intervention effect Green manure raised winter wheat grain yield by 3.2% in year three.
Intervention effect B increased winter wheat grain yield by 14.4% in year three.
Intervention effect BS increased winter wheat grain yield by 22.2% in year three.
Intervention effect B increased winter wheat grain yield by 12.7% in year four.
Intervention effect BS increased winter wheat grain yield by 19.4% in year four.
Mechanism Yield increases arose primarily through increased wheat population density.
Mechanism Higher grain yield contributed to higher wheat water use efficiency.
Intervention effect In year three, GM increased wheat water consumption (WC) by 2.4%.
Intervention effect In year three, GM increased wheat WUE by 1.7%.
Intervention effect In year three, B increased wheat water consumption (WC) by 8.3%.
Intervention effect In year three, B increased wheat WUE by 5.6%.
Intervention effect In year three, BS increased wheat water consumption (WC) by 10.4%.
Intervention effect In year three, BS increased wheat WUE by 10.7%.
Intervention effect Basal fertilizer and basal fertilizer with straw produced higher yield and nitrogen nutrition than green manure alone.
Intervention effect Green manure with basal fertilizer and straw achieved the highest yield and nitrogen nutrition.
Intervention effect Green manure combined with fertilization decreased nitrogen uptake efficiency.
Intervention effect Green manure combined with fertilization increased nitrogen productivity.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“decrease in relative water content”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics