View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon: winter wheat ✕
Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The authors attribute reduced photosynthesis to nonstomatal factors and stomatal closure.
decrease of photosynthetic activity e0 non-stomatal factors in combination with stomatal closure e0 Verbatim
e0 “The decrease of photosynthetic activity was probably dominated by non-stomatal factors in combination with stomatal closure. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1404 t0 “WINTER WHEAT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–71 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
As irradiance decrease d, field-grown winter wheat net photosynthesis decrease d proportionally.
net photosynthesis e0 irradiance decreased e0 Verbatim
e0 “Measurements on leaves of winter wheat showed that the re was true saturation of net photosynthesis at high irradiances but as irradiance decrease d the re was a proportional decrease in net photosynthesis . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 148–351 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
A 1 ℃ temperature increase decrease d daily canopy photosynthesis by about 2.9%.
temperature increases 1 ℃ e0 daily total photosynthesis e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the canopy photosynthesis decrease s with temperature increasing,and the daily total photosynthesis will decrease by about 2.9% when the temperature increases 1 ℃ ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–1020 e1 “winter wheat canopy photosynthesis model ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 291–331 Other claims from this paper (4) Mechanism observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The ratio decline was primarily due to lower photosynthesis .
a decrease in P e0 Verbatim
e0 “The P/R ratio decrease d primarily at the expense of a decrease in P. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1035 t0 “winter wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–34 Other claims from this paper (6) Mechanism hypothesis original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The authors attributed reduced photosynthesis under excess zinc to changes in the photosynthetic apparatus.
photosynthesis rate e0 changes in the photosynthetic apparatus e0 Verbatim
e0 “It is assumed that the se changes in the photosynthetic apparatus are the main causes of a decrease of photosynthesis rate in plants under the se conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1286 e1 “Zn 1000 μM ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–523 e2 “winter wheat (cv. Mironovskaya 39) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–599 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Net photosynthesis declined across organs as irrigation frequency declined.
decrease of the irrigation time e0 net photosynthetic rate e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “winter wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–92 e0 “The net photosynthetic rate decrease d in all the investigated organs with decrease of the irrigation time ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1709–1814 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Enhanced ozone significantly decrease d the photosynthetic capacity of winter wheat.
capacity of photosynthesis e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the enhanced O3 causes a significant decrease in the capacity of photosynthesis of winter wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1549–1644 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect Ozone stress at 100 nL/L increased NPQ in winter wheat leaves by 13.5%-29.0% relative to ambient air. Intervention effect Ozone stress at 100 nL/L increased Y(NPQ) in winter wheat leaves by 13.3%-22.7% relative to ambient air. Intervention effect At 100 nL/L ozone, winter wheat yield measured under nature light decreased by 4.6%-7.6% relative to control. Intervention effect At 100 nL/L ozone, winter wheat yield measured after dark adaptation decreased by 11.3%-19.3% relative to control. Intervention effect At 100 nL/L ozone, Pn of winter wheat was reduced by 8.0%-9.8% relative to control. Intervention effect At 100 nL/L ozone, stomatal conductance (Gs) of winter wheat was reduced by 11.0%-23.1% relative to control. Intervention effect At 150 nL/L ozone, the Y(NO) of winter wheat increased by 37.9%-75.6% relative to control. Intervention effect At 150 nL/L ozone, (1-qP)/NPQ of winter wheat increased by 157.1%-325.8% relative to control. Intervention effect At 150 nL/L ozone, c(i) of winter wheat increased by 3.4%-18.1% relative to control. Intervention effect At 150 nL/L ozone, winter wheat yield measured under nature light decreased by 10.2%-13.6% relative to control. Intervention effect At 150 nL/L ozone, winter wheat yield measured under the IC condition decreased by 21.4%-29.1% relative to control. Intervention effect At 150 nL/L ozone, Pn of winter wheat decreased by 28.1%-39.9% in comparison with control. Intervention effect At 150 nL/L ozone, Ls of winter wheat decreased by 5.2%-21.3% in comparison with control. Intervention effect At 150 nL/L ozone, qP of winter wheat decreased by 15.8%-30.4% in comparison with control. Intervention effect At 150 nL/L ozone, Pm of winter wheat decreased by 27.6%-45.6% in comparison with control. Intervention effect At 150 nL/L ozone, NPQ of winter wheat decreased by 3.3%-52.9% in comparison with control. Intervention effect At 150 nL/L ozone, Y(NPQ) of winter wheat decreased by 5.7%-17.9% in comparison with control. Intervention effect At 100 nL/L ozone, Pm, qP and (1-qP)/NPQ of winter wheat were similar to control. Observation The critical load of ozone for the PS II reaction center of winter wheat lies between 100 and 150 nL/L. Mechanism author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
At 150 nl·L-1 ozone without environmental stress, authors attributed lower photosynthesis to non-stomatal limitation.
150 nl·L-1 of ozone e0 decrease of net photosynthetic rate e0 non-stomatal limitation e0 Verbatim
e0 “under no environmental stress, the decrease of net photosynthetic rate could be attributed to the stomatal and non-stomatal limitation in treatments 100 and 150 nl·L-1 of ozone,respectively. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1179 t0 “winter wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–57 Other claims from this paper (11) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Lower grain mass and starch under heat and water stress were associated with lower photosynthesis and less post anthesis assimilate accumulation.
high temperature and water stresses e0 decrease of grain mass and starch content e0 lower photosynthetic rate and less post-anthesis assimilates accumulation e0 Verbatim
e0 “the decrease of grain mass and starch content under high temperature and water stresses was associated with the lower photosynthetic rate and less post-anthesis assimilates accumulation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1541–1726 t0 “winter wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–140 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
At 280 versus 210 nitrogen, leaf and canopy photosynthesis decrease d during grain filling.
grain-filling stage e0 280 kg N·hm -2 e0 Aleaf and Acanopy e0 Verbatim
e0 “When N supply increases from 210 to 280 kg N·hm -2 , GY has no significant variation; however, the Aleaf and Acanopy during the grain-filling stage and the CGR during the flowering-ripening stage decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–971 t0 “winter wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–68 Other claims from this paper (4) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Triticum aestivumt0