View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon: spring wheat ✕
Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Under shading, the percentage decrease in leaf and culm area of spring wheat was lower than the percentage decrease in dry weight .
decreasing percentages of leaf and culm area e1 Verbatim
e0 “field-grown spring wheat (cv. Haruyutaka) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 85–126 e1 “The decreasing percentages of leaf and culm area, however, were lower compared with those of dry weight s ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–976 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Thousand-grain dry weight decrease d significantly.
1000-grain dry weight e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a significant decrease of 1000-grain dry weight (2.23% and 6.34%) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1129 t0 “spring wheat to elevated CO2 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–42 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
N nutrition decrease d root volume and dry weight under heavy water stress.
Application of N nutrition e0 root volume and root dry weight e0 under heavy water stress e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Application of N nutrition could decrease root volume and root dry weight under heavy water stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–813 t0 “spring wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–99 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing density from 500 to 800 grains per 1 m 2 reduced weed air- dry weight by 27%.
800 grains per 1 m 2 e0 Verbatim
e0 “Increasing sowing density from 500 to 800 grains per 1 m 2 resulted in a decrease by 22% in the number of weeds and by 27% in their air- dry weight . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–966 t0 “SPRING WHEAT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–95 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Wheat productive tillering, productive stems and grain weight per ear declined in 2014.
field bindweed e1 weed productive tillering, the number of productive stems and grain weight per ear e0 Verbatim
e0 “decrease of productive tillering, the number of productive stems and grain weight per ear ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1231 e1 “Dry weight stalks field bindweed in 2013 was 1.1 g ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–689 t0 “SPRING WHEAT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–12 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Shading to 70% of natural light for three weeks before heading reduced total dry weight to 75% of unshaded plants.
shading (70, 50 and 25% of natural light condition) e1 Total dry weights e3 decrease inferred e3 during three weeks before heading e2 Verbatim
e0 “field-grown spring wheat (cv. Haruyutaka) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 85–126 e1 “Three levels of shading (70, 50 and 25% of natural light condition) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–67 e2 “Effect of shading during three weeks before heading ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–346 e3 “Total dry weight s were 75, 52 and 40% of that of unshaded (light intensity=100%) in 70, 50 and 25% light plots, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–784 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Shading to 50% of natural light for three weeks before heading reduced total dry weight to 52% of unshaded plants.
shading (70, 50 and 25% of natural light condition) e1 Total dry weights e3 decrease inferred e3 during three weeks before heading e2 Verbatim
e0 “field-grown spring wheat (cv. Haruyutaka) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 85–126 e1 “Three levels of shading (70, 50 and 25% of natural light condition) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–67 e2 “Effect of shading during three weeks before heading ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–346 e3 “Total dry weight s were 75, 52 and 40% of that of unshaded (light intensity=100%) in 70, 50 and 25% light plots, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–784 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Shading to 25% of natural light for three weeks before heading reduced total dry weight to 40% of unshaded plants.
shading (70, 50 and 25% of natural light condition) e1 Total dry weights e3 decrease inferred e3 during three weeks before heading e2 Verbatim
e0 “field-grown spring wheat (cv. Haruyutaka) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 85–126 e1 “Three levels of shading (70, 50 and 25% of natural light condition) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–67 e2 “Effect of shading during three weeks before heading ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–346 e3 “Total dry weight s were 75, 52 and 40% of that of unshaded (light intensity=100%) in 70, 50 and 25% light plots, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–784 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat thousand-grain weight and grain yield relative to conventional tillage.
CTS, NTS, and NT e0 thousand-grain weight, grain yield, and dry matter yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “different conservative tillage systems (CTS, NTS, and NT) significantly ( p < 0.05) increased the plant height, number of spikes per plant, seed number per meter square, root yield, aboveground biomass yield, thousand-grain weight , grain yield, and dry matter yield compared with CT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1354 t0 “spring wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–118 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat root, aboveground biomass and dry matter yields relative to conventional tillage.
CTS, NTS, and NT e0 root yield, aboveground biomass yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “different conservative tillage systems (CTS, NTS, and NT) significantly ( p < 0.05) increased the plant height, number of spikes per plant, seed number per meter square, root yield, aboveground biomass yield, thousand-grain weight , grain yield, and dry matter yield compared with CT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1354 t0 “spring wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–118 Other claims from this paper (14) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Triticum aestivume0