Search claims · PlantClaims

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IND efficacy was comparable between spring and winter wheat.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume0
Interactor: FusariumFusariumt0pathogen
Outcome: efficacy against INDe0
Direction: comparablee0

Verbatim

e0
“All application programs had comparable efficacy against IND between spring and winter wheat types”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1990–2088

t0
“Fusarium Head Blight and Deoxynivalenol in Spring and Winter Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–153

Title

Effects of Pre- and Postanthesis Applications of Demethylation Inhibitor Fungicides on Fusarium Head Blight and Deoxynivalenol in Spring and Winter Wheat

Pierce A. Paul; Carl A. Bradley; Laurence V. Madden; et al. Plant Disease 2018. doi:10.1094/pdis-03-18-0466-re

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Every fungicide program reduced FHB index and DON versus the nontreated check.
Intervention effect CA controlled IND by 52.2%.
Intervention effect PA controlled IND by 51.5%.
Intervention effect CL controlled IND by 45.9%.
Intervention effect PL controlled IND by 41.3%.
Intervention effect CE and PE controlled IND by less than 33%.
Intervention effect Anthesis and postanthesis treatments reduced IND relative to preanthesis treatment by 14.9 to 29.7%.
Intervention effect CA reduced IND by 11.7% relative to CL.
Intervention effect PA reduced disease by 17.4% relative to PL.
Intervention effect Same-timing comparisons between the two fungicide combinations found no significant difference in IND efficacy.
Intervention effect CA exceeded PA in DON efficacy by 7%.
Intervention effect CL exceeded PL in DON efficacy by 12.8%.
Intervention effect DON efficacy was 10 to 16% greater in spring than winter wheat for applications at or after anthesis.
Intervention effect All programs increased grain yield and test weight relative to the nontreated check.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Same-timing comparisons between the two fungicide combinations found no significant difference in IND efficacy.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: prothioconazole + tebuconazolee0
Interactor: FusariumFusariumt0pathogen
Outcome: efficacy against INDe0
Comparator: metconazolee0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“Differences in efficacy against IND between pairs of prothioconazole + tebuconazole and metconazole treatments applied at the same timing (CE versus PE, CA versus PA, and CL versus PL) were not statistically significant.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1663–1883

t0
“Fusarium Head Blight and Deoxynivalenol in Spring and Winter Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–153

Title

Effects of Pre- and Postanthesis Applications of Demethylation Inhibitor Fungicides on Fusarium Head Blight and Deoxynivalenol in Spring and Winter Wheat

Pierce A. Paul; Carl A. Bradley; Laurence V. Madden; et al. Plant Disease 2018. doi:10.1094/pdis-03-18-0466-re

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Every fungicide program reduced FHB index and DON versus the nontreated check.
Intervention effect CA controlled IND by 52.2%.
Intervention effect PA controlled IND by 51.5%.
Intervention effect CL controlled IND by 45.9%.
Intervention effect PL controlled IND by 41.3%.
Intervention effect CE and PE controlled IND by less than 33%.
Intervention effect Anthesis and postanthesis treatments reduced IND relative to preanthesis treatment by 14.9 to 29.7%.
Intervention effect CA reduced IND by 11.7% relative to CL.
Intervention effect PA reduced disease by 17.4% relative to PL.
Intervention effect CA exceeded PA in DON efficacy by 7%.
Intervention effect CL exceeded PL in DON efficacy by 12.8%.
Observation IND efficacy was comparable between spring and winter wheat.
Intervention effect DON efficacy was 10 to 16% greater in spring than winter wheat for applications at or after anthesis.
Intervention effect All programs increased grain yield and test weight relative to the nontreated check.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A+2 reduced FHB index 30% relative to anthesis application.

Taxon: WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: A+2e0
Outcome: INDe0
Direction: reducede0
Value: 30e0
Comparator: anthesis applicatione0

Verbatim

e0
“A+2 and A+6 significantly reduced IND by 30 and 14%, respectively, relative to the anthesis application.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1257

t0
“Soft Red Winter Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–133

Title

Efficacy of Fungicide Applications During and After Anthesis Against Fusarium Head Blight and Deoxynivalenol in Soft Red Winter Wheat

D. L. D'Angelo; C. A. Bradley; K. A. Ames; et al. Plant Disease 2014. doi:10.1094/pdis-01-14-0091-re

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect All fungicide application timings significantly reduced transformed FHB index versus untreated wheat.
Intervention effect All fungicide timings significantly reduced transformed damaged-kernel incidence versus untreated wheat.
Intervention effect All fungicide timings significantly reduced log DON versus untreated wheat.
Intervention effect Postanthesis and anthesis fungicide applications generally did not differ significantly in transformed FHB index, damaged kernels, or DON.
Intervention effect A+2 controlled FHB index by 69% versus untreated check.
Intervention effect A+2 controlled DON by 54% versus untreated check.
Intervention effect A+4 controlled FHB index by 62% versus untreated check.
Intervention effect A+4 controlled DON by 52% versus untreated check.
Intervention effect A+6 controlled FHB index by 62% versus untreated check.
Intervention effect A+6 controlled DON by 48% versus untreated check.
Intervention effect Anthesis application controlled FHB index by 56% versus untreated check.
Intervention effect Anthesis application controlled DON by 50% versus untreated check.
Intervention effect A+6 reduced FHB index 14% relative to anthesis application.
Intervention effect Postanthesis applications did not reduce DON relative to anthesis application.
Recommendation The authors conclude fungicide use through six days after anthesis may match or exceed anthesis use for FHB and DON reduction.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A+6 reduced FHB index 14% relative to anthesis application.

Taxon: WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: A+6e0
Outcome: INDe0
Direction: reducede0
Value: 14%e0
Comparator: anthesis applicatione0

Verbatim

e0
“A+2 and A+6 significantly reduced IND by 30 and 14%, respectively, relative to the anthesis application.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1257

t0
“Soft Red Winter Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–133

Title

Efficacy of Fungicide Applications During and After Anthesis Against Fusarium Head Blight and Deoxynivalenol in Soft Red Winter Wheat

D. L. D'Angelo; C. A. Bradley; K. A. Ames; et al. Plant Disease 2014. doi:10.1094/pdis-01-14-0091-re

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect All fungicide application timings significantly reduced transformed FHB index versus untreated wheat.
Intervention effect All fungicide timings significantly reduced transformed damaged-kernel incidence versus untreated wheat.
Intervention effect All fungicide timings significantly reduced log DON versus untreated wheat.
Intervention effect Postanthesis and anthesis fungicide applications generally did not differ significantly in transformed FHB index, damaged kernels, or DON.
Intervention effect A+2 controlled FHB index by 69% versus untreated check.
Intervention effect A+2 controlled DON by 54% versus untreated check.
Intervention effect A+4 controlled FHB index by 62% versus untreated check.
Intervention effect A+4 controlled DON by 52% versus untreated check.
Intervention effect A+6 controlled FHB index by 62% versus untreated check.
Intervention effect A+6 controlled DON by 48% versus untreated check.
Intervention effect Anthesis application controlled FHB index by 56% versus untreated check.
Intervention effect Anthesis application controlled DON by 50% versus untreated check.
Intervention effect A+2 reduced FHB index 30% relative to anthesis application.
Intervention effect Postanthesis applications did not reduce DON relative to anthesis application.
Recommendation The authors conclude fungicide use through six days after anthesis may match or exceed anthesis use for FHB and DON reduction.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A+2 controlled FHB index by 69% versus untreated check.

Taxon: WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: A+2e0
Outcome: INDe0
Direction: higheste0
Value: 69e0
Comparator: checke0

Verbatim

e0
“Relative to the check, A+2 resulted in the highest percent control for both IND and DON, 69 and 54%, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1083

t0
“Soft Red Winter Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–133

Title

Efficacy of Fungicide Applications During and After Anthesis Against Fusarium Head Blight and Deoxynivalenol in Soft Red Winter Wheat

D. L. D'Angelo; C. A. Bradley; K. A. Ames; et al. Plant Disease 2014. doi:10.1094/pdis-01-14-0091-re

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect All fungicide application timings significantly reduced transformed FHB index versus untreated wheat.
Intervention effect All fungicide timings significantly reduced transformed damaged-kernel incidence versus untreated wheat.
Intervention effect All fungicide timings significantly reduced log DON versus untreated wheat.
Intervention effect Postanthesis and anthesis fungicide applications generally did not differ significantly in transformed FHB index, damaged kernels, or DON.
Intervention effect A+2 controlled DON by 54% versus untreated check.
Intervention effect A+4 controlled FHB index by 62% versus untreated check.
Intervention effect A+4 controlled DON by 52% versus untreated check.
Intervention effect A+6 controlled FHB index by 62% versus untreated check.
Intervention effect A+6 controlled DON by 48% versus untreated check.
Intervention effect Anthesis application controlled FHB index by 56% versus untreated check.
Intervention effect Anthesis application controlled DON by 50% versus untreated check.
Intervention effect A+2 reduced FHB index 30% relative to anthesis application.
Intervention effect A+6 reduced FHB index 14% relative to anthesis application.
Intervention effect Postanthesis applications did not reduce DON relative to anthesis application.
Recommendation The authors conclude fungicide use through six days after anthesis may match or exceed anthesis use for FHB and DON reduction.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Anthesis application controlled FHB index by 56% versus untreated check.

Taxon: WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: Ae0
Outcome: INDe1
Value: 56e0
Comparator: checke1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“followed by A+4 (62 and 52%), A+6 (62 and 48%), and A (56 and 50%).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1152

e1
“Relative to the check, A+2 resulted in the highest percent control for both IND and DON”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1057

t0
“Soft Red Winter Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–133

Title

Efficacy of Fungicide Applications During and After Anthesis Against Fusarium Head Blight and Deoxynivalenol in Soft Red Winter Wheat

D. L. D'Angelo; C. A. Bradley; K. A. Ames; et al. Plant Disease 2014. doi:10.1094/pdis-01-14-0091-re

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect All fungicide application timings significantly reduced transformed FHB index versus untreated wheat.
Intervention effect All fungicide timings significantly reduced transformed damaged-kernel incidence versus untreated wheat.
Intervention effect All fungicide timings significantly reduced log DON versus untreated wheat.
Intervention effect Postanthesis and anthesis fungicide applications generally did not differ significantly in transformed FHB index, damaged kernels, or DON.
Intervention effect A+2 controlled FHB index by 69% versus untreated check.
Intervention effect A+2 controlled DON by 54% versus untreated check.
Intervention effect A+4 controlled FHB index by 62% versus untreated check.
Intervention effect A+4 controlled DON by 52% versus untreated check.
Intervention effect A+6 controlled FHB index by 62% versus untreated check.
Intervention effect A+6 controlled DON by 48% versus untreated check.
Intervention effect Anthesis application controlled DON by 50% versus untreated check.
Intervention effect A+2 reduced FHB index 30% relative to anthesis application.
Intervention effect A+6 reduced FHB index 14% relative to anthesis application.
Intervention effect Postanthesis applications did not reduce DON relative to anthesis application.
Recommendation The authors conclude fungicide use through six days after anthesis may match or exceed anthesis use for FHB and DON reduction.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A+4 controlled FHB index by 62% versus untreated check.

Taxon: WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: A+4e0
Outcome: INDe1
Value: 62e0
Comparator: checke1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“followed by A+4 (62 and 52%), A+6 (62 and 48%), and A (56 and 50%).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1152

e1
“Relative to the check, A+2 resulted in the highest percent control for both IND and DON”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1057

t0
“Soft Red Winter Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–133

Title

Efficacy of Fungicide Applications During and After Anthesis Against Fusarium Head Blight and Deoxynivalenol in Soft Red Winter Wheat

D. L. D'Angelo; C. A. Bradley; K. A. Ames; et al. Plant Disease 2014. doi:10.1094/pdis-01-14-0091-re

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect All fungicide application timings significantly reduced transformed FHB index versus untreated wheat.
Intervention effect All fungicide timings significantly reduced transformed damaged-kernel incidence versus untreated wheat.
Intervention effect All fungicide timings significantly reduced log DON versus untreated wheat.
Intervention effect Postanthesis and anthesis fungicide applications generally did not differ significantly in transformed FHB index, damaged kernels, or DON.
Intervention effect A+2 controlled FHB index by 69% versus untreated check.
Intervention effect A+2 controlled DON by 54% versus untreated check.
Intervention effect A+4 controlled DON by 52% versus untreated check.
Intervention effect A+6 controlled FHB index by 62% versus untreated check.
Intervention effect A+6 controlled DON by 48% versus untreated check.
Intervention effect Anthesis application controlled FHB index by 56% versus untreated check.
Intervention effect Anthesis application controlled DON by 50% versus untreated check.
Intervention effect A+2 reduced FHB index 30% relative to anthesis application.
Intervention effect A+6 reduced FHB index 14% relative to anthesis application.
Intervention effect Postanthesis applications did not reduce DON relative to anthesis application.
Recommendation The authors conclude fungicide use through six days after anthesis may match or exceed anthesis use for FHB and DON reduction.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A+6 controlled FHB index by 62% versus untreated check.

Taxon: WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: A+6e0
Outcome: INDe1
Value: 62e0
Comparator: checke1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“followed by A+4 (62 and 52%), A+6 (62 and 48%), and A (56 and 50%).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1152

e1
“Relative to the check, A+2 resulted in the highest percent control for both IND and DON”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1057

t0
“Soft Red Winter Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–133

Title

Efficacy of Fungicide Applications During and After Anthesis Against Fusarium Head Blight and Deoxynivalenol in Soft Red Winter Wheat

D. L. D'Angelo; C. A. Bradley; K. A. Ames; et al. Plant Disease 2014. doi:10.1094/pdis-01-14-0091-re

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect All fungicide application timings significantly reduced transformed FHB index versus untreated wheat.
Intervention effect All fungicide timings significantly reduced transformed damaged-kernel incidence versus untreated wheat.
Intervention effect All fungicide timings significantly reduced log DON versus untreated wheat.
Intervention effect Postanthesis and anthesis fungicide applications generally did not differ significantly in transformed FHB index, damaged kernels, or DON.
Intervention effect A+2 controlled FHB index by 69% versus untreated check.
Intervention effect A+2 controlled DON by 54% versus untreated check.
Intervention effect A+4 controlled FHB index by 62% versus untreated check.
Intervention effect A+4 controlled DON by 52% versus untreated check.
Intervention effect A+6 controlled DON by 48% versus untreated check.
Intervention effect Anthesis application controlled FHB index by 56% versus untreated check.
Intervention effect Anthesis application controlled DON by 50% versus untreated check.
Intervention effect A+2 reduced FHB index 30% relative to anthesis application.
Intervention effect A+6 reduced FHB index 14% relative to anthesis application.
Intervention effect Postanthesis applications did not reduce DON relative to anthesis application.
Recommendation The authors conclude fungicide use through six days after anthesis may match or exceed anthesis use for FHB and DON reduction.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P3 was among the most efficacious single applications for control of FHB index, DON and ZEA.

Taxon: WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: P3e0
Outcome: control of FHB index (IND), deoxynivalenol (DON), zearalenone (ZEA)e0
Direction: most efficaciouse0
Comparator: single-application treatmentse0

Verbatim

t0
“Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–109

e0
“PA and P3 were the most efficacious of the single-application treatments in terms of mean percentage control of FHB index (IND), deoxynivalenol (DON), zearalenone (ZEA)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–762

Title

Efficacy of Genetic Resistance and Fungicide Application Against Fusarium Head Blight and Mycotoxins in Wheat Under Persistent Pre- and Postanthesis Moisture

Wanderson Bucker Moraes; Laurence V. Madden; Pierce A. Paul Plant Disease 2022. doi:10.1094/pdis-02-22-0263-re

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PA was among the most efficacious single applications for control of FHB index, DON and ZEA.

Taxon: WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: PAe0
Interactor: FHBe0pathogen
Outcome: control of FHB index (IND), deoxynivalenol (DON), zearalenone (ZEA)e0
Direction: most efficaciouse0
Comparator: single-application treatmentse0

Verbatim

t0
“Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–109

e0
“PA and P3 were the most efficacious of the single-application treatments in terms of mean percentage control of FHB index (IND), deoxynivalenol (DON), zearalenone (ZEA)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–762

Title

Efficacy of Genetic Resistance and Fungicide Application Against Fusarium Head Blight and Mycotoxins in Wheat Under Persistent Pre- and Postanthesis Moisture

Wanderson Bucker Moraes; Laurence V. Madden; Pierce A. Paul Plant Disease 2022. doi:10.1094/pdis-02-22-0263-re

Other claims from this paper (10)

“efficacy against IND”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics