Search claims · PlantClaims

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cluster analysis grouped genotypes into three genotypes and eight independent genotypes for head diameter.

Taxon: sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Material: genotypese0
Outcome: three genotypes and eight independent genotypese0

Verbatim

t0
“sunflower”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 61–70

e0
“three genotypes and eight independent genotypes regarding head diameter”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–680

Title

Variability of plant height and head diameter in new hybrid combinations of sunflower

Radovan Marinkovic; Milan Jockovic; Sinisa Jocic; et al. Ratarstvo i povrtarstvo 2011. doi:10.5937/ratpov1101239m

Other claims from this paper (4)

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tolerant genotypes were distinguishable from highly susceptible genotypes.

Outcome: Tolerant genotypes could be distinguished from highly susceptible genotypese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0
“Tolerant genotypes could be distinguished from highly susceptible genotypes.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1197

Title

Plaschil, Sylvia; Krämer, Reiner OpenAgrar 2010

Other claims from this paper (4)

Method / resource Detached leaf and shoot bioassays were established.
Method / resource Digital image analysis quantified disease symptoms.
Observation Genotypes differed significantly in susceptibility and disease progress.
Observation No true resistance occurred in the screened gene pool.

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Competitive genotypes were generally taller than noncompetitive genotypes.

Taxon: spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: competitive genotypese0
Outcome: tallere0
Direction: tallere0
Comparator: noncompetitive genotypese0

Verbatim

e0
“competitive genotypes were generally taller than noncompetitive genotypes”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1133

t0
“spring wheat genotypes”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–82

Title

Differential competitive ability of morphologically diverse spring wheat genotypes

D. G. Huel; Pierre Hucl 1993

Other claims from this paper (5)

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cluster A of Annona genotypes contained sixteen genotypes.

Taxon: AnnonaAnnonat0
Outcome: Cluster Ae5
Value: sixteen genotypese5

Verbatim

t0
“Annona Genotypes”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–60

e5
“Cluster A has sixteen genotypes”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1481

Title

Phenology and Molecular Characterization of Annona Genotypes

Jagruti S. Mahla; N. V. Soni; Ashita Patel; et al. International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management 2024. doi:10.23910/1.2024.5289

Other claims from this paper (16)

Observation Annona genotypes showed three leaf shapes: ovate, elliptic and lanceolate.
Observation Annona genotypes differed in fruit shape (cordate, rounded and irregular).
Observation Annona genotypes had medium and late time of harvest maturity.
Observation TSS of Annona genotypes ranged from 18.39 to 28.32 °B.
Observation Titratable acidity of pulp of Annona genotypes ranged from 0.18 to 0.80%.
Observation Reducing sugar of Annona genotypes ranged from 15.02 to 19.44%.
Observation Non-reducing sugar of Annona genotypes ranged from 2.77 to 5.92%.
Observation Total sugar of Annona genotypes ranged from 17.79 to 23.70%.
Observation Ascorbic acid of Annona genotypes ranged from 27.55 to 43.10 mg 100 g-1.
Observation Phenol of Annona genotypes ranged from 0.18 to 0.36%.
Method / resource Fourteen SSR primers detected twenty-six alleles in Annona genotypes.
Method / resource SSR markers detected on average 1.86 alleles per locus in Annona genotypes.
Method / resource The polymorphism information content of the SSR markers ranged from 0.09 to 0.38.
Observation Similarity index values among Annona genotypes varied from 0.58 to 1.00.
Observation Mean similarity index among Annona genotypes was 0.83.
Observation Cluster B of Annona genotypes contained two genotypes of different Annona species.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other genotypes had AUDPC near or above susceptible genotypes.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome: AUDPC valuese0
Comparator: susceptible genotypese0

Verbatim

e0
“Other soybean genotypes either had AUDPC values nearer to susceptible genotypes or more than these genotypes”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–477

Title

Identification of Soybean Genotypes for Slow Rusting

G.G. Khot; B. P. Kurundkar; V.S. Shlnde; et al. Journal of Plant Disease Sciences 2010

Other claims from this paper (2)

Observation DS 228 showed slow rusting and lower AUDPC than control.
Recommendation Authors judge other genotypes unsuitable for western Maharashtra rust hot spots.

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Introduced sweetpotato genotypes produced a higher yield than local genotypes.

Taxon: sweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Material: introduced genotypese4
Outcome: yielde4
Direction: highere4
Comparator: local genotypese4

Verbatim

t0
“sweetpotato ( Ipomoea batatas ) genotypes”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–102

e4
“The introduced genotypes produced a higher yield than local genotypes”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1031

Title

Genotype × environment interaction and stability analysis of sweetpotato ( Ipomoea batatas ) genotypes

Mehmet Emin Caliskan; Elif Erturk; Tahsin Sogut; et al. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science 2007. doi:10.1080/01140670709510172

Other claims from this paper (7)

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Susceptible genotypes showed the greatest decrease in chlorophyll content relative to resistant genotypes.

Taxon: sweet sorghum genotypest0
Material: Susceptible genotypese0
Outcome: chlorophyll contente0
Direction: decreasede0
Comparator: resistant genotypese0

Verbatim

e0
“Susceptible genotypes showing maximum decreased rate of chlorophyll content as compared to resistant genotypes”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–782

t0
“sweet sorghum genotypes”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–67

Title

Morphological and biochemical assessment of sweet sorghum genotypes for shootfy resistance

AU Ingle; Kusalkar Dv; Gare Ss; et al. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2019

Other claims from this paper (14)

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yellow soybean genotypes have much less grana stacking than normal green genotypes.

Taxon: SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Material: yellow genotypese1
Outcome: grana stackinge0
Direction: much lesse0
Comparator: normal green genotypese0

Verbatim

e0
“these genotypes have much less grana stacking than normal green genotypes”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–774

e1
“yellow genotypes”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–642

t0
“Soybean Genotypes”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–109

Title

A Comparison of Pigment-Protein Complexes among Normal, Chlorophyll-Deficient and Senescent Soybean Genotypes

Kenneth Eskins; Dean Delmastro; Leland Harris PLANT PHYSIOLOGY 1983. doi:10.1104/pp.73.1.51

Other claims from this paper (3)

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The remaining 51 genotypes were identified as mixed genotypes

Taxon: chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome: mixed genotypese1
Value: 51e1

Verbatim

t0
“Kabuli type chickpea genotypes”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–73

e1
“The rest of genotypes (51) were identified as mixed genotypes”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1559

Title

Assessment of genetic diversity among some Kabuli type chickpea genotypes using ISSR markers

Mahdieh Lorineghad; Mahdi Mohayegi; Rooholallah Abdolshahi; et al. DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) 2018. doi:10.22103/jab.2018.2154

Other claims from this paper (17)

Observation Nine ISSR primers detected 79 polymorphic bands among the chickpea genotypes
Observation Number of effective alleles varied across ISSR primers
Observation Mean Nei’s genetic diversity across all studied chickpea genotypes was 0.24
Observation Mean Shannon’s index across all studied chickpea genotypes was 0.38
Observation Nei’s genetic diversity in the ICARDA-originated population was 0.27
Observation Nei’s genetic diversity in the Turkey-originated population was 0.2
Observation Nei’s genetic diversity in the Iran-originated population was 0.2
Observation Shannon’s index in the ICARDA-originated population was 0.44
Observation Shannon’s index in the Turkey-originated population was 0.32
Observation Shannon’s index in the Iran-originated population was 0.3
Observation Molecular variance analysis found a significant difference between the populations
Observation Only 10% of the total variance was between populations
Observation Cluster analysis divided the genotypes into four groups that differed from the primary regional grouping
Observation Cluster analysis confirmed that most genetic variation lies within the studied population
Observation STRUCTURE separated the genotypes into four groups of 14, 5, 8 and 4 genotypes
Observation The studied chickpea genotypes showed wide genetic diversity
Recommendation The genotypes could be used in future chickpea breeding programs

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cluster with 13 genotypes and cluster V with 10 genotypes.

Taxon: blackgramVigna mungot0
Outcome: genotypese2
Value: 13 genotypese2
Qualifier: V had 10 genotypese2

Verbatim

t0
“Genetic divergence in blackgram”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–31

e2
“cluster n had 13 genotypes and V had 10 genotypes”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 176–225

Title

Genetic divergence in blackgram {Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper}

M. Venkatesan; M. Prakash; J. Ganesan 2003

Other claims from this paper (6)

“genotypes”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics